1 point

Only a biology professor could know wiping out an entire animal population affects biodiversity negatively.

permalink
report
reply
69 points

The genuinely toxic tale is that we sat around for 69 years before we decided to fix things.

permalink
report
reply
71 points

Most people like to argue that “people didn’t know better back then.” That’s absolute bullshit. There were ecologists and scientists fighting to preserve wolves in the 1920s, and conservatives and capitalists chose to ignore the best advice of educated experts because killing wolves was easier and more profitable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points
*

Well I for sure learned in school that our ancestors called wolves the nurses of the forest. In our culture anyway. They’re very important because by hunting old and sickly animals preferentially instead of killing indiscriminately, they improve the overall health of populations of other animals like deer or elk. Obviously it’s also not great for any population to get too large because they’ll destroy their own food supply. Again, release the wolves.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Fascinating, even if a gruesome thought if you reverse the analogy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

For the sake of argument, even if they didn’t know any better (shame on them for not knowing better), they could’ve easily recognized the problem and fixed it much sooner than 1995.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Sure, but we still have conservatives and capitalists ignoring the best advice of educated experts because it’s easier and more profitable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The system is geared towards negative presumption of the recent past even as it glorifies and reveres the long past (ancient philosophers and religious figures).

Just in case most of us figure out that anything we think of as new or intractable problems are things that we knew about and were deliberately ignored or actively campaigned against by the same forces that do it now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

PETA is still against it. Adding to the evidence that PETA is not a serious organization.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

PETA are POS that needs to be put down like the rabid dogs they are.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Are we about through with the 69 years sitting around about climate change? Can we actually start fixing things?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

How much of that was seeing what all those decades actually DID, and a generation later realizing it needed to be changed.

Still it’s crappy we are so crappy with our home. I do think we should work exceptionally hard to fix things here. Find real solutions to problems. Else what’s the point of going to other planets? We need those same skills to survive, terraform, geoengineer, know the potential for ecology, etc.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

2065: the entire population of Montana is wolves.

spoiler

Don’t ask about Idaho or Wyoming.

permalink
report
reply
14 points

We’re reintroducing wolves in my state now and its been problematic so far.

https://coloradosun.com/2025/03/05/gray-wolves-depredation-payments-colorado-wildlife-commission/

Nb: I don’t have a side in this. Just sharing recent news.

permalink
report
reply

The environment is more important than rancher’s bottom lines

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

1000%

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
4 points

I wonder if anyone knows whether ranchers in WY / MT lost income & were compensated by the state as well?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Yes, they were. The Wyoming Game and Fish Commission regularly compensates losses due to predation that have been verified.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Reintroducing wolves won’t work everywhere.

Hunting can be an effective population control as well, but seeing how large and sparsely populated Yellowstone is, it’s probably why it didn’t work there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I guess the government pays for all other lost income due to natural events?

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I like the concise text information, but as a graphic designer this infographic is very poorly laid out and very easily causes confusion (as partially seen in the comments here).

permalink
report
reply

Science Memes

!science_memes@mander.xyz

Create post

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don’t throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 4.6K

    Posts

  • 118K

    Comments