53 points

lol do it. she will eat shit even harder

permalink
report
reply

Addicted to losing

permalink
report
reply
34 points

Controlled opposition alright

permalink
report
parent
reply

permalink
report
reply
19 points

Surprised tbh I was expecting them to run a blue dog. Pull in a “moderate” Republican and try that instead. We’ll see maybe they still do that

permalink
report
reply

Harris ran her campaign like she was one (tough on immigration, tough on crime, bringing out neocons like Cheney)

Maybe they’ll just have her completely abandon any sort of pretensions of not being a fascist monster

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

They’ll 86 the impassioned speech about abortion this time around.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Her parading the Cheney endorsement weeks before the election will be memory holed by Dems

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points
*

my favorite was bringing Bill Clinton to Michigan to tell Arab Americans that their relatives in Palestine deserved to die

permalink
report
parent
reply

Jeb! (D) 2028

Jeb Bush/Liz Cheney (D)

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

I’m not against her specifically. I’m against her nonsense DNC appointed policy. Running to the right had never once been a winning strategy. The entire Schumer Strategy is a unmitigated failure.

Run on progressive policy and you cannot lose. It took the entire Democratic machine to stop Sanders.

The DNC is a Corporation. It’s full name as shown in court documents is the DNC Services Corp. They are controlled opposition. If they lose, it’s because they chose to. It is a conscious decision on their part. They have the numbers. The analytics. The polling. They know how to win. They know how to keep control indefinitely and they actively choose not to because their own interests as a corporation line up with republican fiscal policy. Tax cuts and empire. Those are the frontline policies that matter to them. It’s why they appear toothless. It’s why Schumer is sending “strongly worded” letters to Chump instead of rallying democrats to play hardball. It’s why they’re all desperate to stop David Hogg from going after those do nothing democrats.

permalink
report
reply
58 points

I’m not against her specifically.

Why not? Her history as DA and AG is terrible, even if her policies weren’t outright absurd she’s proven herself to be irredeemable and untrustworthy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

Given the pool of candidates the dems want to draw from, is irredeemable and untrustworthy really all that specific?

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

No. Not in the slightest.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Slop.

!slop@hexbear.net

Create post

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can’t post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances’ admins or moderators.

Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/gossip

Community stats

  • 1.7K

    Monthly active users

  • 273

    Posts

  • 3.8K

    Comments