I don’t get why a such law took so long, but late is better than never.

23 points

Wow, MISSOURI did that???

MISSOURI??!??

permalink
report
reply
10 points

I’m thinking the tipping point has been reached, the pendulum is now moving away from conservatism, and we’ll see little upsets like this as rural states begin to shift back. Missouri is facing a hell of a medicaid cut which they can’t afford, that may ripple for a while.

Unfortunately they have short memory spans but eventually they’ll flip for a generation, like the New Deal era. People will just give up on MAGA and go the other way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

No they wont. They’ll continue to blame others and refuse to accept responsibility. There will be no pendulum swing because they will keep reinforcing themselves through radical fascist media expansion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

I’ll be deep in the cold, cold ground before I recognize Missouri.

permalink
report
parent
reply
87 points
*

Rep. Hardy Billington, R-Poplar Bluff, was among the few who spoke against the bill, arguing that barring pregnant teenagers from getting married would increase abortion rates.

“We all claim to be pro-life here in the body,” Billington said. “Now we’re going to vote on this bill where babies are going to die.”

Disgusting. What a pitiful excuse to enable the trafficking of children. I’m ashamed to live here. There’s no fucking guarantee that it would even increase abortion rate, this guy is a closeted pedophile looking out for his ilk.

Apparently he’s been spouting this bullshit for at least the past year. Not to mention he’s also a homophobe.

permalink
report
reply
42 points
*

Sounds like an old guy from the 50s, who still clings to 50s social mores and stigmas, unaware that being a single mother isn’t the massive taboo he remembers it being.

Checks Hardy Billington’s Wikipedia page

Born 1952 or 1953 (age 71–72)

Aaaaaand there we have it. Not sure why his exact birthdate isn’t known. In fact the only notable thing on that page is about him expressing opposition to another child marriage bill that was proposed last year. Imagine having “strongly endorses child marriage” as the one and only legacy from your 70+ years of life. Gross.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

It’s okay because there’s an R next to his name. It wouldn’t shock me if people were fully aware of his views. The abortion argument works for women here and the men here were sold at “child marriage.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

That’s a good take. The generational difference is real, that good old shotgun wedding from the past.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Most likely he has just never revealed his birthday to the public to Wikipedia is just guessing on the year.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
*

Republican men are probably throwing a fit that they won’t be able to legally groom and rape children for “family values” anymore

permalink
report
reply
15 points

The year is 2025…

And America is still this ass backwards.

Least some good news for once.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

Abolish Marriage.

We don’t need the state or religious authorities dictating our relationships.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Amen, brother.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Need to do something for stuff like inheritance and visitation rights that’s currently coupled (pun intended) to marriage.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

National Emergency Contact Database. Sign a piece of paper together to make each other emergency contacts in the eyes of the govt. have as many as you’d like!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Well in my ideal view we would abolish the state and abolish capitalism, so those things aren’t too much of an issue.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

That would solve many problems, but stuff like “Who gets to visit you in the hospital?” and “who gets your personal belongings when you expire?” might need some thought. There are likely easy to solve, but still require some thought.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That’s the role of the de facto union. But the civil union usually grants you special conditions, along with your spouse.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Uplifting News

!upliftingnews@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews, a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity often found in today’s news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity’s capacity for good.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else’s big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

Community stats

  • 6.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 880

    Posts

  • 13K

    Comments