30 points
*

Urban fighting is pure nightmare fuel for all parties.

It’d probably be safer for the civilians, to open up refugee camps outside of the contested area, allow inspected movement, unmolested, from the combat zone to the refugee camps, screening people, making sure they don’t bring anything. Then announcing 100 m zones, that will be destroyed, leveling it, repeating everyday. Just pushing everyone out to the refugee camps. It would be an awful genocidal abuse, but it would save lives, it gives civilians the opportunity to get out of combat. It’s only possible because Gaza is already a lockdown prison.

The upcoming death toll is going to be terrible no matter what. My soul is truly saddened

permalink
report
reply
27 points

Yes, except that the collateral damage is not a bug it’s a feature.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

It would also save the lives of Israeli ground forces. If they don’t have to clear house to house, they won’t die in house to house fighting

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

I know, I was agreeing with your plan and methodology. I just don’t see that happening for a couple of reasons.

  • It’s not clear to me that women & children would be allowed to actively leave. There is a lot of social pressure not to abandon your group regardless of the threat to your personal safety.

  • Absolutely no fighting age men would be allowed into refugee camps or containment zones no matter what because checking every single one of them for weapons or IEDs is both extremely dangerous and time consuming. Plus they could be scouting or providing intelligence in other ways that would not be immediately clear.

  • When you allow for a more humanitarian solution you are opening yourself up to scrutiny on multiple fronts based on how you are treating those within your care. It is easier to simply throw out leaflets or warning signals before bombing / clearing an area, and then let the chips fall where they may. It gives plausible deniability against the invariable collateral damage that is to follow.

  • Lastly, war is always a dirty business. The truth is those within the military / government are always more willing to risk civilian casualties on the oppositional side rather than answering for casualties within their own forces. They also know the general public has an inbred need for revenge when these kinds of events occur. The silent majority often holds a “better us than them” mentality in the short term before cooler heads prevail, or people are exposed to the atrocities of their own military operations in the long term. Even then the damage has already been done, and most people simply move on.

There is no humanitarian solution coming. It is a nice thought, and a well intentioned one at that. But I can unequivocally guarantee you that there will be no financial or logistical appetite for saving Palestinian lives in this conflict, no matter what everyone repeats in the media. That is all for show. The hard truth is that many innocent people will die, the world will move forward, and Israel will collect it’s pound of flesh so it can save face on the world stage.

End of story.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Even if the Isreali’s completely level Gaza they will then have to fight a Stalingrad-esque campaign of fighting militants and remaining commandos in the remains of the city. Not to mention whatever tunnels survived the raids.

No matter how you cut it, thousands will die on their side if they push. They don’t really seem to have a choice to back down now, but even if somehow they keep their casualties limited in Gaza, now the entire northern front has opened up with Hezb and other milita entering the frey. Its really a trap you can’t win.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Urban fighting is pure nightmare fuel for all parties.

It’d probably be safer for the civilians, to open up refugee camps outside of the contested area, allow inspected movement,

That was never really on the table in Palestine. And especially less so now that there’s 1200 dead Isreali’s. They are not crossing into any lands held by the IDF without becoming prisoners.

The Egyptians have also refused to keep the border crossing open so fleeing to Egypt isn’t an option either.

The pogroms have already started in response. There’s nothing or noone that can stop this fight now. Sometimes the gears of history turn and crush those beneath it. And this time we’re helping crush people beneath those gears. Its all fucked.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

I wish people would realize that, while Egypt and Jordan are not as culpable as Israel when it comes to the Palestinian apartheid (and now genocide), they’re culpable at a certain level themselves by not aiding Palestinians trying to flee Israeli violence or keeping them in their own refugee camps.

From what I can tell from my reading up, Palestinians were treated like shit by other Arab groups before Israel. They’ve never been especially high in the order of things. Israel is just treating them even worse than they’ve been treated before.

So while I’m glad there is condemnation of Israel, there needs to also be condemnation of Egypt and Jordan. They know they can allow Palestinians to resettle in their countries if those Palestinians so wish (not the best solution by any means) and they won’t do it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

I don’t always agree with your comments, but this is an incredibly important point that needs to be phrased in exactly this way as part of the discussion.

Egypt and Jordan sticking Palestinians on a lower rung of the social cast and treating them like a backwater minority group is only adding what seems like intentional fuel to this fire, especially at this point. Sometimes externalized pressure from your neighbors doing the right thing is what it takes to force a rational resolution to a long standing crisis.

It seems to me that the international community would have A LOT less of an appetite for the bullshit Israel does if there were Palestinian refugee camps in Jordan & Egypt that became the humanitarian face of the issue. It would put a shit load of pressure on Israel to make concessions towards a long standing solution.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Egypt and Jordan did take in Palestinian refugees at one point in the past. What followed was civil strife in Egypt, and a civil war in Jordan where their king actually died. Similar thing happened in Lebanon and Kuwait.

By no means does this mean it’s right for them to ignore Palestinian refugees, nor that the past dictates the future, nor that Palestinians are inherently violent. I just understand their reticence.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

open up refugee camps outside of the contested area, allow inspected movement, unmolested, from the combat zone to the refugee camps, screening people, making sure they don’t bring anything

So… create a mini-Gaza inside of Gaza?

It wouldn’t work anyway. Terrorists keep using civilian infrastructure to hide among it, they would also find a way to infiltrate any refugee camps, which would only end up bringing the combats to them.

Unless the next step were to make a mini-mini-Gaza inside the mini-Gaza refugee camps… then what, continue until nobody’s left? 😒

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Right wing extremists fighting right wing extremists.

No solutions will come, just a ton of violence.

permalink
report
reply
0 points

Recent events have made me ponder if war is just purging these people from our planet every once in awhile.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

The majority of the Gaza Strip is under 18.

You should think about that for a little bit, that the majority are literally children, and how that came to pass, before saying garbage like this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

I’m talking about combatants in Ukraine and Israel/Gaza.

You should take a deep breath and learn to control your emotions before jumping to conclusions.

You spend too much time on social media, so you’re always looking to get angry. It’s not healthy.

Gonna block you now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Hamas has amassed a formidable rocket arsenal since Israeli soldiers last entered Gaza in 2014. It has also built hundreds of kilometres of tunnels, nicknamed the “Gaza Metro”, to move fighters and weapons around undetected, and trained for urban combat.

It’s going to be Vietnam-style guerilla warfare in an urban area. Pop out of the tunnels, attack from the shadows, then disappear back into the tunnels.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Complete with a million Mai Lai massacres by Israel.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Republicans?

permalink
report
reply
4 points
*

I don’t think so…

This might apply if they were not going to just level the place.

This will probably be more “shock and awe” combined arms level the place and anyone in it with the orders being that in 24h time anyone left there is to be considered an enemy combatant.

I don’t agree with killing civilians like that but that’s what’s going to happen. Because right now they feel they have the geopolitical cover to just go in like a steamroller and flatten everything.

permalink
report
reply

World News

!world@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 272K

    Comments