1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
2 points

Fucking clown show.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

I realize this is a bit off topic, but do UK’s judges still use those fake wigs today? I know that they did in back when the US split off, but I just wondering if they still do or if this is just a relevant stock photo.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Yeah, they’re still worn by higher court judges here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Barristers too. (In the UK barristers are the lawyers who argue in court, solicitors are the lawyers who do the paperwork and find barristers for clients who need a hearing in court.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Judges have been told to delay the sentencing of convicted criminals currently on bail – including rapists and burglars – because prisons are full, according to a report.

Earlier this year, in a court of appeal case, Edis said that for offences which attract shorter terms, judges and magistrates should consider imposing suspended sentences given “current prison population levels”.

Last year, the government announced Operation Safeguard, the emergency use of 400 police cells to hold inmates.

To much criticism, it recently said it would seek to rent prison cells in foreign countries to alleviate the squeeze in England and Wales.

In his court of appeal judgment in March, Edis cited a letter from the then justice secretary, Dominic Raab, which said: “Detention would be harsher than before on account of high occupancy levels, reduced access to rehabilitation programmes and the possibility of prisoners being detained further away from home.”

Speaking to Times Radio, the health secretary, Steve Barclay, refused to confirm or deny that judges had been told not to send some convicted criminals to jail owing to prisons nearing capacity but acknowledged prisons were under “huge pressure”.


The original article contains 548 words, the summary contains 188 words. Saved 66%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Half-baked idea: Rather than not putting people in, start letting long-servers out to make room.

Lots of problems with it, sure, hence half-baked, but there must be quite a few long servers whose early release would be less harmful than letting the unimprisoned receive no punishment (or even extended inconvenience) at all.

Or are prisons already full of people who are more harm than the people we can’t fit in there any more?

I mean, if hospitals can kick people out when they need the bed…

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Even better, let everyone in there for drug offenses, sex work, and no violent crime out.

permalink
report
parent
reply

United Kingdom

!unitedkingdom@feddit.uk

Create post

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think “reputable news source” needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

Community stats

  • 1.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.9K

    Posts

  • 18K

    Comments