109 points

I’m sure everybody gets the reference, but Junior is referring to reports that Hamas used hang gliders or paragliders during their attack on Israel.

So, he’s just trying to use a dog whistle here to try to remind Republicans that we should all be afraid of brown people. However, dog whistles are supposed to be subtle, so that the people who it isn’t targeted for, won’t even hear it. He’s so inept at public speaking that he can’t even do that correctly.

On a personal level, I live in Texas. I really don’t want to have a gun, but if I did buy one, it wouldn’t be out of fear of brown people paragliding into my house. It would be out of fear of white fascist Republicans breaking down my front door.

permalink
report
reply

Less a dog whistle and more of a tuba in this case, I think.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Wolf tuba

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Chihuahua Sousaphone

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

if I did buy one, it wouldn’t be out of fear of brown people paragliding into my house. It would be out of fear of white fascist Republicans breaking down my front door.

As a Portland resident, that’s a logical fear:

https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/proud-boys-oath-keepers-antifa-portland-violence-spreading-1224762/

Members of any at risk group should consider being armed. The police aren’t there to protect you and there have been court cases which ruled they have no obligation to do so.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1525280/

“In a 7–2 opinion, the Supreme Court ruled that due process principles did not create a constitutional right to police protection, despite the existence of a court-issued restraining order.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

One thing I know, every liberal gun owner is a marksman. They’ve trained with their firearms and know them fifty times better than a Conservative does.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Oh look, it’s me! ;)

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

you are goddamn right

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Yes Don Jr is right that we should have guns generally, but more because of what his dad’s cult is doing.

Don’t ever believe that any gun control laws will disarm those guys. It’s way too easy to hide guns and ammo, and there are hundreds of millions of them all over the country.

So it’s best to have it and not need it, rather than needing it and not having it. Because they are going to have it anyway.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

Don’t ever believe that any gun control laws will disarm those guys.

Even if this is true, counterintuitively, gun control laws will still work. We’ve seen this exact thing in Australia. (Which admittedly is easier to do because it’s an island)

What happens is that guns become more rare, and yes, only bad guys and cops have access to guns, however, because guns are rare, it’s much harder even for bad guys to get more guns. Guns become much more valuable, and as they’re valuable, bad guys will become reluctant to use them unless the reward is great. If you take a $1000 gun to rob $50 from a 7-11, and if you get caught, you’re losing $950. You’re way better off just using a knife or something, and then you can sell the gun.

So even if only bad guys have guns, guns are still used in fewer crimes. Everybody gets safer, little by little. Eventually, they’re only going to use guns for crimes with huge payoffs. And they were going to do that, anyways, even if there weren’t gun control laws.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

Well we’re not going to do any of that in the USA. Fortunately our gun rights are inalienable and confirmed in triplicate by our Supreme Court.

I would never be happy with living in a society where the cops and criminals are the only ones with guns. Freedom is far more valuable to my life than security, and my security is perfectly fine for my risk tolerance level.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Unless having it puts you at higher risk of suicide, in which case maybe don’t have it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

You’re more likely to injury or kill yourself or family than an intruder, so there’s that too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

It would be out of fear of white fascist Republicans breaking down my front door.

Legitimate thing to fear. And what are you going to do, call the cops? You’ll just have more of them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It would be out of fear of white fascist Republicans breaking down my front door.

Who would then execute you on sight. Even if you managed to shoot your way out, sooner or later they’ll find you and kill you.

Guns don’t work against state violence. By the time you need them, you’ve already lost.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

As a Texan, a lot of the fascist republicans you run into day to day are not in government. Not federal, not state. Terrified irrational morons who only see through a veil of hate are a real concern.

They are in your trailer parks and rural areas. In Texas, it would take me less than an hour to go from downtown to rural. In fact, its a straight shot down the interstate.

Rifles won’t stop a tank. Good luck hitting a bomber. The government, especially in the US, is too numerous and too well equipped. Jim Bob and his inbred son Rusty are much more of a concern and manageable with a rifle.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

They were armed by the same grossly inadequate gun laws and will use the same “he had a gun” excuse the cops do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Jim Bob and his inbred son Rusty are much more of a concern and manageable with a rifle.

They’ll be armed the same as you, and will have the initiative, which makes this not an ideal solution.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I have a strong belief in my ability to survive without violating my personal ethics. This is one reason why I don’t own a gun today. Like I said, I can only imagine purchasing a gun out of fear, and I don’t have that fear yet.

As of now, I think myself much safer without a gun.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Well I mean we are always hearing about how extreme and radical they are. I wouldn’t be surprised if we see them coming in on skateboards next.

permalink
report
parent
reply
61 points

Look at his cute little “I-do-manual-labor” costume.

permalink
report
reply
15 points

Borrowed it from his gardener

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Also being in front of a bunch of books, like he knows how to read.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Everything these people do and say is a performance, gun stuff included

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

The man who shot a bunch of my coworkers had this exact attitude… He was buying guns and “high capacity” magazines because the government was going to be making them illegal. Kinda wish they had, what little it might have done.

permalink
report
reply
22 points

Where did this happen, if you don’t mind saying. Just would like to read up on the incident.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

It’s really sad that “guy shoots up office, kills coworkers with rifle” doesn’t really narrow anything down in the US.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I’d rather not - sorry. This bit didn’t really make it into the press though as it wasn’t really part of his stated motive or the motive argued in court by the prosecution. But it was something he didn’t exactly hide.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That’s cool, don’t share any information you are not comfortable with. Thank you for the reply.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Against an airborne target like hypothetical imaginary Hamas paragliders, I think a shotgun with a light choke would probably be a little more suitable.

I know! We can hire Dick Cheyney to stand guard for us. He’s great at peppering things with birdshot.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

I prefer Hollywood style flaming arrows!

permalink
report
parent
reply

Your flaming arrows will be no match for my crack squad of trained attack pigeons.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Squad of crack-trained pigeons?

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

When near year’s batch of once-in-100-years extreme weather events comes, you can shoot at the tornado. It won’t stop it, but it will give you a sense of power in your final moments.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

In D&D we tried that once, after a crit fail the arrow came out and hit the person who fired at it.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 450K

    Comments