266 points

Blows my mind that anyone still uses WinRAR when 7zip exists.

permalink
report
reply
79 points

What should blow your mind is that it’s 2023 and you still need a separate program to extract compressed files on windows. 😂 Good thing they’re adding native support for it in windows 11. FINALLY.

permalink
report
parent
reply
58 points
*
28 points

Yeah, it just sucks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I don’t recall anyone having Plus! back then.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

When did windows have native rar support?

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

You do on Linux as well, it’s just installed by default.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

For my personal use, Linux has every single thing I need right out of the box. That’s why it’s my main OS.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

And often, you need two! I use both gzip and tar all the time

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Same with Mac OS, it’s such a fucking no brainer and it’s not hard to impl

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

they’re adding native support for it in windows 11

What could possibly go wrong.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Windows’ built in unzipping tool has really messed up my system before by uncompressing files wrong in subtle ways. I’ll always prefer to use a program made by a third party whose livelihood depends on the quality of their software over some value-add baked in junk.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Not like zip is supported and Windows added (finally tbf) support for other archives.
https://www.theverge.com/2023/5/23/23734625/microsoft-windows-11-rar-support-native

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

I’m willing to bet a big part of that are all the antitrust lawsuits they got for internet explorer and windows media player back in the day and just not wanting to open that box as it comes to rarlab.
.zip support they’ve had for well over two decades though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

WinRAR was good in ancient times when it was the only zip program available. Even in the Windows XP era there were better things to use if you knew about them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Winrar in ancient times? Lol. People have been arching for a long time before that. Unix, amiga, apple, pc… that is a funny sentence.

Don’t remember PKARK, ARC, and PKWARE? Zip became popular after the battle with SEA.

I believe Winrar became popular because it was easier to use with multi volume archives. Which conveniently worked well with parity files, which all worked great for distributing on usenet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Well it would blow your mind to know that many people just use whatever they know that does the job

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

There is a certain sense of old friend that you know by heart, I’ve downloaded so much things where the last step was to pass it by WinRAR, but yeah I should change when there are proofs like that

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

FUCK WINRAR!

it’s so stupid and amazing this recent celebration of people that are proud to have paid for it.

It was never a good solution really…

It just worked for what it was for a time… Because it was better than WinZip or pkzip.

7-zip has been amazing for years

Better OS support would be cool too but it’s so unnecessary thanks to 7zip.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

FUCK WINRAR!

People on Lemmy sometimes get really angry at the dumbest things.

You don’t like Winrar, that’s your right, chill dude.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

WinRAR is shit and I have no need to chill.

But guess what, thinking and expressing that you think my opinion is dumb is your right so carry on otherwise.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

WinRAR was great for the time and their policies on paying for the program were extremely generous. Time just overtook it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s essentially just shareware.

More specifically, it’s nagware which wasn’t particularly uncommon for the time WinRAR was introduced so I don’t know that it’s particularly generous really when one considers all the other nagware that came out in the late 90s.

It’s just one of many different licensing strategies.

In this case it seems to have paid off for the developer as it appears to have resulted in a great deal of fondness and goodwill among a certain portion of the user base.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

It was never great.

Their “generous” pay if you want to remove this obnoxious message prompt aside…

It was temporarily useful until better alternatives arose… Which took virtually no time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

7z recently also had an exploit. It’s not magically safer.

RAR compresses significantly faster than 7z (in relation to the compression ratio of course).

RAR has recovery records, 7z doesn’t. RAR4 even had cryptographic signatures included. But RAR5 dropped that.

7z is nice, but it’s not objectively better than RAR on every account.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Your can create recovery records, par2, for zip archives

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

It just worked for what it was for a time… Because it was better than WinZip or pkzip.

Yes this is why it is loved as a piece of software history.

I get you probably were a twinkle in your dad’s eye in those days, but that doesn’t mean people who were alive then should care less.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Dude… I’m 50 years old and have worked in the technology industry since 1997.

Which should be pretty obvious considering I mentioned fucking pkzip which was a DOS utility.

Give me a fucking break with the condescension.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

We hate WinRAR now?

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

I just feel like that people who are still opening RAR files are technically savvy enough to have moved on from WinRAR

Edit: and the people who would still use it aren’t really opening archives anymore so I don’t know who this is affecting. Maybe they have corporate contracts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

Not hate but we graduate to 7zip.

Isnt the FOSS thingie all the hype around lemmy? Feel like every discussion tends to drift towards FOSS topics (ironic, I know) and if an app with proprietary modules will be hated to hell and back.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Oh, I’ve somehow never seen anyone express that 7zip is FOSS; I didn’t realize that. This should be the first thing anyone points out about it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

It’s pretty old, there’s a whole meme around it

https://www.reddit.com/r/PaidForWinRAR/

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

You really don’t have to share a Reddit. Just make a ss and we will understand.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

WinRAR had a great gui and it integrates much better (imho) into windows than 7zip, only thing 7zip has going for it is it’s free.

If we are talking command line, rar is free (inb4 Unix guys butt in)

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

The only thing I missed switching to 7zip was the UX. 7zip is a bit weird at first, but then you find out that it will extract lots of installers. So now you can just get the wifi driver and not the bloatware that comes along with it, and it’s all good.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

7zip integrates very nicely into Explorer (so you can right click a file or folder and compress straight from there). I admit the main GUI of 7zip looks ancient but I never needed it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

If you’re on Windows (I know I know, switch to Linux) I prefer NanaZip over base 7zip

https://github.com/M2Team/NanaZip

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

doesn’t WinRAR do certain things that 7zip doesn’t?

I can’t think of what 7zip lacks, but I know it does lack some features

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Exactly!

And it’s the only thing WinRAR does that 7zip doesn’t… Besides all the things 7zip does better… Like compression… 😂

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

The reason WinRAR was useful to me allllllll those years ago was for one thing and one thing only: You could split an archive into chunks. So mostly I found that it was good for getting my warez in 1.44MB chunks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Anon: hey Krudler, do you have a cracked copy of GTA3

Krudler: say no more, friend

Sends 350 floppy disks with the cracked game

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yes. That splitting files was especially useful because emails used to have attachment size limits.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Afaik, the only thing 7Zip lacks in comparison to WinRAR is the ability to create rar files, and that’s only because the format is proprietary.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

this is true I actually needed to get winrar to install a free game I acquired lately 7z would not open it properly for some reason

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Why not? I prefer it over 7-Zip because it has built-in parity both in the archive itself and as separate files. You can achieve the latter with 7-Zip using PAR, but it’s just more convenient to have it built-in for both parity creation and recovery.

I also feel like it’s consuming a lot less RAM while compressing at similar speeds and achieving similar, if not sometimes better (RAR5), results.

Just because it had a zero-day bug that has already been fixed doesn’t mean it’s bad software. I wouldn’t be surprised if zero-days came to light in other archival software. 7-Zip isn’t magically immune to this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I don’t get why someone would prefer rar over zip and 7z.
Even tar.gz and all their flavors are more common.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Yeah, well technically .cab is more common than tar.gz but that doesn’t mean I’d start using it.

I personally use RAR because I think it’s a better format than ZIP, but I use ZIP when I have to share the archive with anyone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

WinRAR also has clever password and encryption features. (Set short master password, quickly encrypt/decrypt any saved very long passwords.) Integration is great. Updates are regular. I only wish the UI would be updated a bit (more than just icon packs, dark mode).

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

There’s the occasional RAR archive 7-Zip doesn’t open for me, but WinRAR does. 🤷🏻

permalink
report
parent
reply
64 points

7zip exists and is free.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

7zip will unpack rar files? I’ve used it for years and never knew.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points
*

It’ll unpack everything

Packing / unpacking: 7z, XZ, BZIP2, GZIP, TAR, ZIP and WIM Unpacking only: APFS, AR, ARJ, CAB, CHM, CPIO, CramFS, DMG, EXT, FAT, GPT, HFS, IHEX, ISO, LZH, LZMA, MBR, MSI, NSIS, NTFS, QCOW2, RAR, RPM, SquashFS, UDF, UEFI, VDI, VHD, VHDX, VMDK, XAR and Z.

https://www.7-zip.org/

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Will it unpack my bags from the weekend? Cos it’s Friday now and I still can’t be bothered

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

You may have problems unpacking RAR of latest format versions with 7zip. It’s been some time since I encountered that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Yea. It just can’t pack files into RaR.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I can’t find any reason why someone would still use rar in 2023. When I see anyone using it, it means to me they’re as technologically literate as my grandpa.

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points

Fuck WinRAR. It’s for normie NPCs. 7Zip is FOSS, and everybody should be using it instead.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

7zip’s Linux port (p7zip) was lagging back in functionality last I heard, and also was abandoned then, don’t know how it is now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

why do I find nothing about that on the 7zip website, but I do find stuff about p7zip?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Ah. It’s not packaged in xbps which is why I didn’t know.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Better yet stop using Windows

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Broken record

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’m a .NET dev, I wish lmao

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’d say “well .NET is cross platform” but knowing the average company on .NET it’s probably version 3.5 and running off a windows 95 server that hisses whenever someone gets too close to it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Tbh I quite like developing .net on my Mac. I do away with VS and just use vscode and command line. It feels nice

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Better yet

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Not feasible for the vast majority of users. It’s still not mature. Dunno when it’ll be if ever.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

Wow, really shilling for Russian software man, that’s low, certainly the Russians have no insights to 7zip.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

You can read and build the source code yourself if you’re really worried what some Russian FOSS contributors are up to, but I can assure you it’s going to be a lot less sus that whatever a proprietary application can do without any ability to audit and check the code.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

Who the hell hurts winRAR? That’s like punching Dolly Parton.

permalink
report
reply
34 points

See guys, we shoulda paid for it back then. Now we’re paying for it now XD

permalink
report
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 543K

    Comments