The pirates are back - Anew study from the European Union’s Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) suggest that online piracy has increased for the first time in years. In fact, piracy rates have bee…::We analyze a new study where the EUIPO suggests online piracy is on the increase within the European Union.

418 points

Love how it doesn’t mention the fact that services are getting objectively worse content as they stretch thin, are increasing their prices across the board, and cracking down on password sharing which was previously touted as a benefit.

permalink
report
reply
159 points

Exactly. There’s too many platforms, not enough quality content on any one of them, and weaponized greed. Worse, these streaming services have “inspired” every asshole executive out there to make everything under the sun a subscription model.

permalink
report
parent
reply
122 points
*

The anti-piracy measures drive me to piracy, personally. There’s no technical reason I shouldn’t be able to stream 4K in Firefox, but Netflix won’t let me. I have to jump through hoops just to get 1080p, even. Same with most other services. I pirate shit I’m already paying for.

permalink
report
parent
reply
85 points

Have done this several times for content on Disney+. I have an ultrawide, HDR1000 display. The movie I’m trying to watch is in 21:9 and available in HDR. Why in God’s name are you delivering it in SDR and in a letterboxed 16:9 which is in turn pillarboxed on my display?!

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

This so much. I’m lucky enough to be able to afford enough streaming services to cover the majority of what I want to watch (although that’s changing for the worse over time). I just want to pipe them all through Kodi or some other software into a unified interface that is media source agnostic, that can also stream the content in the best quality available for my screen.

At that point the content is already paid for, I don’t need to use your own individual reinvention of the interface that inevitably focuses on pushing uninteresting content instead of making it as easy as possible to continue what I’ve already started watching or to find what I want.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Also none of the apps have any kind of audio equalizer or range compression, so if you don’t have an audio receiver then you’re doomed to constantly turning up the volume for spoken sections. Absolute minimum viable product garbage.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Yeah, honestly same. There isn’t much I’m not already paying for, but being able to watch it all in one app (Stremio) is so much nicer.

The push for more money, and no more password sharing, is just making me think more about cutting those services, but that wouldn’t stop me watching.

permalink
report
parent
reply
57 points

Enshittification. Every human who uses computers on a daily basis needs to understand this word.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

Yep, the only thing I still pay for is Spotify, and as soon as they start carving up music into different exclusivity contracts I’ll go back to piracy for that as well. I’m willing to pay $10-$20/month for one streaming service, but they want you to spend like $200 on services you don’t even end up watching.

It’s just greed, the way the streaming executives talked during the writers strike showed that. You could easily find an equilibrium that works for content creators and consumers, but the middlemen just want too much.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Or vanish.

Google play music merged into YouTube music.

I already had a Plex server so I just rolled.my.own music server.

And then with the emergence of plexamp… I don’t need a streaming music service now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Have they gotten better? I’ve not had great experience with PMS handling music, even when using PlexAmp, but I last tried maybe about a year ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

This fear is why I’m careful to maintain my old man MP3 and CD collection because I can’t fully trust a business.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I think streaming music will be good for awhile at least, somehow, the fucking music industry got it right with streaming (At least on the consumer side, the artist side has been in trouble for some time now (esp with Spotify)). Most big services have most things and a handful of niche services to handle the gaps for the most part.

Xbox Game Pass otoh for Games is a wildcard, who knows where that shits going to end up lmfao people should get in on it now while it’s still good lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*

I mean, they’re already doing exclusivity contracts for podcasts (eg. Joe Rogan on Spotify only), it’s going to be a small leap to go to artists being exclusively on one service, and before you know the labels will all start their own streaming service, so you have to have different apps for Sony BMG artists, another app for indie artists, etc.

The enshittification is mostly pushed by wall street, who want instant bigger profits, and they’re happy to kill the goose that lays the golden eggs in the process. Spotify is not immune to those pressures.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

That plus actively removing older shows

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

No new ones…

Star Trek prodigy

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

People aren’t also willing to spend as much on Oreo’s due to inflation so it’s also probably that if theres a game or movie everyone’s playing, sailing the seven seas is tried and true…and free.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Exactly. That’s when I went back to the seas. My family across 2 states uses Netflix and I already paid for the $20/month high tier. When they told my sister that it wasn’t about to be more expensive, I put my foot down and said I’m gonna setup a plex/overseer box on my on PC. It’s been working mostly alright.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Weird thing to love but you do you

permalink
report
parent
reply

The shift really proves that Gabe Newell was right and that piracy is a service issue and that, for a time, the many services available were worth paying for.

permalink
report
reply
121 points
*

It was honestly really crazy to me when I was excited to see a game on sale, only to remember how I used to pirate everything. Steam has made it legitimately easier to buy games in so many cases.

I sometimes still do pirate games, especially if it’s from a publisher I don’t respect or the cracked version is known to run better, but I buy almost all of my games now days.

I’ve actually started setting up a home server for pirated movies and shows and getting rid of the couple streaming services I have.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

I still Piraten EA games, just because the forced origin injection into their games on steam is so fucking annoying, especially if you’re on Linux.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I fucking hate origin, yeah

permalink
report
parent
reply
84 points
*

I know a lot of people idolize him, and that’s probably not healthy, but he just gets it. Provide value and convenience for consumers, and consumers will stick around. Be an inconvenience while squeezing consumers for money, and we’ll leave with a parrot on our shoulders and a one-finger salute.

permalink
report
parent
reply
57 points

That’s what happens when you’re not beholden to shareholders.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

He’s a weird case, Steam has always been good for pc gaming and Valve releases nothing but polished games without anything predatory.

He just seems to be interested in maintaining a successful business instead of squeezing more money out of people constantly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Ehh… for as great as Steam and Gaben are, TF2 really seems to have been the catalyst for all the ridiculous lootbox microtransaction mess we have nowadays.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

cough CS2 cough

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Valve releases nothing but polished games without anything predatory.

Counterpoint: Artifact.

(I mostly agree on everything else though)

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Points at CS2

That thing… That wretched thing…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Sadly most companies are focused on short term profit over long term growth, Steam is the best example of the opposite.

permalink
report
parent
reply
212 points

The EUIPO speculates that financial pressures, like inflation, means that people have less money to spend on entertainment. This can be seen in the way that fewer people are signing up for Netflix or Amazon Prime – and some are even cancelling their subscriptions altogether.

Ah yes, that’s the only reason. Not that streaming services are offering less content and functionality for more money, that can’t be it.

permalink
report
reply
68 points

I’m sure that economics is part of it. But I think the larger issue is the fact that you need 9 streaming services now just to see the shows you’d want. And then these streaming services are starting to remove the things people paid for. I set up a Plex server and just use that to watch things now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

And that’s only talking about streaming.

Everyone wants to be Netflix now: Microsoft Office? Monthly subscription. Adobe? Monthly subscription. A simple weather app? Monthly subscription. Cloud backup? Monthly subscription.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Fair enough for cloud storage as it costs real money to keep rust spinning. The rest not so much.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I think with quite a lot of software, monthly subs are really the best way to do it, and I think if you look at the history of things software is cheaper than it’s ever been. Aside from the obvious things that just cost monthly money to operate (cloud storage, even weather apps don’t keep working without servers) the reality is that we expect software to stay up to date and keep getting better. Aside from the fact that prior to sub fees for this type of software, the “one time” purchase cost used to be several orders of magnitude higher, and you would still basically end up “subscribing.” Meaning, you didn’t just buy Office in '95 for $300-$500 and keep using it until even 2005. MS would change a file format or upgrade a thing or something, and suddenly your $400 Office suite needed an upgrade, so you paid another $400 in '97.

People have never liked paying for software, but I think this is the most equitable, true model of the actual cost. I like it less with the bigger companies, but especially with smaller devs, the software I rely on I’m happy to pay a monthly sub on because I know that’s a much more stable model and will encourage the dev to keep the software up to date and releasing new features.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Corporations don’t want competition, they want monopolies. If the good they are selling is in unlimited supply, like music or shows in digital formats are, they create artificial scarcity through exclusivity deals.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
81 points

That’s not enough growth. It’s never enough. It literally can’t ever be enough.

So they raise prices and pay for astroturfed articles blaming everything but the executives charged with infinite growth forever.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

First thing that came to mind. I want to see back to back to back quarters of falling subscribers

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

As someone that went initially got back into piracy for the “no you just raised your prices for this one service I only use for this one show anyway, I’ll download it instead” reason. I have significantly increased my piracy because it’s honestly a much better user experience. For me to easily set sonarr/radarr to grab what I want and have a beautiful and customizable UI/UX like jellyfin to consume that content, which works on all my devices. Fucking Hulu, Disney, Amazon, peacock, max all suck in comparison from a pure UX perspective

permalink
report
parent
reply
184 points

The article wonders why would anyone pirate, let us give him the reason:

  1. Ads
  2. Multiple streaming services costing many times more than food. With nothing to see except for re runs and rehashes of old content.
  3. Ads
  4. Rising prices for poor service and shit content.
  5. Ads
  6. Geoblocking
  7. Ads
  8. Low quality videos even if you are willing to pay just because you don’t wish to use their specified player or browser. Why can’t I stream it to VLC player without the overhead of a browser.
  9. Ads
  10. All the while the CEO and the executive of the companies raking in billions on the money they are saying charging us for the artists.
permalink
report
reply
71 points
  1. Ads
  2. Low Video Quality because you don’t want to install Windows
permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points
  1. Craptastic UI
permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points
  1. Forcing me to buy a new TV because my current one is suddenly an “unsupported device”.
  2. Not allowing me to watch Netflix in my summer house because they’re “cracking down on sharing accounts”.
permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I wouldn’t mind using proprietary apps if they weren’t so fucking horrible to use.

Goddammit, if you’re going to force me to install your shitty program just because I want to watch a show you own the license to, at least put a semblance of effort into the UI…

permalink
report
parent
reply
56 points

I forgot to add

  1. Removing content when it is not making enough money.
  2. Ads
permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points
*
  1. Editing exsting content with no warning or notice (for whatever reason- political correctness or losing the soundtrack license doesn’t matter why)
  2. Ads.
permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

Also wanna add:

  1. Missing subtitles in the language you want (looking at you apple tv without English subtitles on local language movies.)
  2. Ads
  3. Only the 2 random seasons in the middle of a TV show are available. And new seasons not added.
  4. Ads
permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points
*

As a person who loves watching movies with subtitles, this is why I’m canceling Amazon Prime. The fuckers literally won’t offer me English language subtitles for some flicks because I Iive outside the US.

I don’t care if the movie itself is in English, why the hell can’t I watch with subtitles in the same language as the film itself? Holy fuck.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points
*

why the hell can’t I watch with subtitles in the same language as the film itself? Holy fuck.

Probably because the subtitles have their own copyright separate from the film itself and Amazon likely doesn’t have the license to the English subtitles outside of the USA. It wouldn’t surprise me, music lyrics have their own separate copyright from the recording after all.

The copyright system is the biggest problem here. It simply isn’t fit for purpose in the digital age, unless that purpose was to benefit a handful of legacy mega corps while harming independent content creators and stifling culture across the globe.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

And rip watching a Christopher Nolan Movie without subtitles nowadays

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

And don’t forget about the ads.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

You will own nothing and you will like it!

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
  1. Content that is pulled halfway through watching it.
permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

You forgot about stuff that just gets taken down one day.

Edit: oh you added it in a comment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

There are a few what I’ll term magnet shows on each streaming service. They want you to pay for the service for the magnet shows and then stick around and watch other half-baked filler garbage or a seasons of a show they cancelled before giving them any hope of finishing their story arc.

Most streaming networks have abundant garbage content I’d never want to watch, knockoffs of other shows, and global content that’s often of soap opera quality with subtitles.

They also (on purpose) often offer no way to filter to the things you want to see other than search, and search is often misleading or terrible too.

It’s basically a race to the bottom just like Amazon. Junk programs created for pennies pretending to match your results.

The whole thing is a crap fest that’s quickly becoming worse than the cable network structure it replaced.

No, thank you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

True I start a new movie or a series but can’t see it past a few minutes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

If you go through the front page, there is usually only 100 shows the platform is pushing, ad nauseam. Like the algorithm is maybe some shows it thinks youll like, or shows they want to astroturf. I would really like a way to go into the dregs, the shit, the stuff netflix thinks is at the bottom of my metrics. Granted, piracy doesn’t do this either (lol how would that even work? I put everything on that server myself) but I would have considered keeping my subscription if they did.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points

More than food? That math just doesn’t add up for me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
161 points

permalink
report
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 543K

    Comments