159 points

The American social safety net fails again. At least this time it was mostly contained.

Condolences to those who will remember him.

permalink
report
reply
53 points

No shit. We had plenty of guns when I was a kid (52 now), even AR-15s and the like, and this wasn’t a normal thing until after Columbine.

I’d hold off on my manifesto, :), but mental health has taken a nosedive in this country. It’s far, far worse than kids can imagine. Fox News, Facebook, the internet, etc. has poisoned our collective brains and discourse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

I’m 38, and yeah it’s seriously fucked. I keep saying this and people still want to plug their ears and scream “it’s the guns!”.

I’m a prime example, I have ADHD and hardcore insomnia, and I got laid off a few months ago, my health insurance just ended. In order to see a psychiatrist it’s gonna cost me $300 out of pocket for the visit, and then generic Ambien is like $120 for 60 pills. I got letters that say I could get health insurance via the COBRA Act of 1985, but it’s SEVEN HUNDRED AND THIRTY DOLLARS A MONTH. Healthcare.gov keeps playing commercials that say “enroll now and you can get health insurance for as low as $10/month!”. I went on there to look and it’s only available for 2024 right now and they want to know your income for 2024. I put in 80k and they said I wasn’t eligible, I put in 40k and it said it was gonna cost $350/month.

My dad is 73 and he constantly has to fight with insurance and the pharmacy to get his Ambien as well.

It’s absolutely ridiculous.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Losing your insurance/job is one of those situations that they’ll enroll you early

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

If you aren’t working, put in zero as your salary.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

That’s brutal, and I’m very sorry to hear that. No one should have to struggle to find help, especially for stuff like that.

I think this whole system is stupid, even from a business sense. If you want quality labour, “happy employees” are the way to go. If you prevent people from getting much wanted/needed help, you’ll have a lot less of those “happy employees”. You’ll also have fewer taxes being paid, less money being spent, fewer people attending events and buying non-essential things, etc. The current set-up makes no sense to me. Instead of imporving anything, let’s just keep continuing to make things worse and then complain that society is getting worse. That will totally fix things. It hasn’t worked for the past couple of decades, but it will totally magically change tomorrow. Assholes.

I hope things get much better for you and your father soon. Y’all deserve MUCH better than this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

If you aren’t working, why are you putting in any salary?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

But… what about the shareholders? What about about their return on investment?

/s

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

almost 10% of your income!? fuck the “hyper socialist” Germany has 6% from my taxes

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

If it puts your mind at ease at all, crime (violent and otherwise) had been on a decline from 1993 until 2016 and while it has risen since 2016, it still hasn’t hit pre-'93 levels last I saw. Furthermore despite what you’d expect, those AR-15s are responsible for less than 500 (all rifles) of our 60,000 gun deaths, which is 0.833333333333% of our gun deaths. In fact, mass shootings account for less than 0.2% of our gun deaths per year. So, I mean “any is too much” yes, but it isn’t near as bad as it seems. source

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

this wasn’t a normal thing until after Columbine.

Things that are relatively new, circa Columbine

  • the 24-hour news cycle

  • rage-farming as a genre of syndicated media (think: Limbaugh, Hannity, InfoWars)

  • selling fear becomes huge moneymaker for opinion programmers (Limbaugh, Hannity, Carlson, etc)

  • politics as a staple on social media comment threads

  • offshore groups (like troll farms, etc) posing as domestic political actors, targeting particular demographics

Ready access to guns is of course a problem, but it’s probably made worse when all those folks with ready access to guns are bathed in fear and loathing 24/7 by millionaires making lots of money telling them things to make them or their families afraid or angry. Just a thought

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

The vast majority of mentally ill people are not violent. The idea that mental illness is largely responsible for the prevalence of mass shooters contributes to the stigma already attached to mental illness.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Know what did happen shortly before Columbine? Reagan dissembled our mental health infrastructure.

I was a teen in the late 80’s. Hell, I thought homelessness was a normal thing I simply hadn’t heard of until MTv started flogging it.

And if the mass shooting didn’t start post-Columbine…? LOL, we didn’t have that word in our lexicon.

FFS, we used to able to buy shotguns in the auto parts store. But suddenly, guns and “easy access” are the problem?

Why don’t you folks start a fight you have a chance of actually winning? Shut down the right-wing propaganda, hard, yesterday.

And while we’re at it, I’d kill for a solid study on how many killers, including suicides, are left/right politically. We both know how that’s gonna play out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

No one is saying all mentally ill people are violent. They’re saying most of these mass shooters are mentally ill. What stigma? That mentally ill people should have help available to them?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Did you miss a century of mental healthcare development?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

It always weirds me out that the first school shooting I remember occurred a few bit over a year before Columbine. Heath High School, December 1997.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

My high school school had a 1970s state championship banner for rifle shooting up in the gymnasium. It might even still be there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The media circus around columbine has certainly contributed to mass shootings. Every loser knows how to be remembered now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

I’ll fucking remember him. Kid realized he was going to harm a lot of people and avoided it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

What safety net?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Sounds like America shouldn’t be selling guns until Republicans have finished curing mental health issues.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

but if we stopped selling guns, how would we cure those mental health issues?

permalink
report
parent
reply
99 points

Sucks that he got to that point, but props for not going through with his plan.

permalink
report
reply
45 points

This is almost uplifting. Like, it’s terrible the man was suffering so much, but it’s admirable that he chose the better of the two options he was giving himself. That probably makes me sound like a terrible person.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

I don’t think that sounds terrible at all. We can all agree, I think, that we’d rather this whole situation not happen at all, but of the two cases, one with one dead by their own hands, and another case with who knows how many dead at the same person’s hands, there’s absolutely nothing wrong with saying you’re happy it was the former and not the latter.

Terrible would be saying he deserved it. Or putting someone in that position. Or a variety of other things, but it’s not being relieved at a lower death toll.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

“His” plan

Had he gone through with it, we would be hearing how he “was on the FBI’s radar”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-14 points

I didn’t kill a bunch of people today, either, so props to me, too, I guess…

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

You probably weren’t at the end of your mental and emotional rope, with what seemed like no other outs. Context matters.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

You don’t know me. McDonald’s fucked up my nuggets order this morning so now I’m a man without anything to live for

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

It’s not that he’s a good person, it’s that he made the right decision at a critical moment. Still not a good decision, but a whole hell of a lot better than what he was prepared to do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
89 points

Sounds like the good guy with the gun was the bad guy with the gun this time.

permalink
report
reply
62 points

A message saying, “I am not a killer, I just want to get into the caves,” was written on a wall of the women’s bathroom where the man was found lying on the floor, according to Garfield County Sheriff Lou Vallario. Nearby, officers found a handgun and explosive devices, some real and some fake, he added.

Geez :(

permalink
report
reply
32 points

There are some special caves as park of the amusement park that you can take tours. The caves reference makes sense.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points
*

I mean, sort of makes sense? I assume with the overkill in firepower, he expected to meet armed resistance. Way more than a security guard would actually pose irl. So that I can at least get my head around.

But if he wanted to sneak into the actual caves like the phrasing would suggest, why die in the bathroom?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

And a bathroom for women. There’s an inappropriate comparison here, somewhere.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Why was he hanging out in a womens bathroom?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I think that’s the least concerning part of this story

permalink
report
parent
reply
61 points

Charles Whitman — Texas Sniper. Killed 14 people in 1966. Autopsy found a brain tumor pressing the amygdala, which presumably caused uncontrollable “fight or flight” response.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

I’ve been wondering if a brain tumor was the Maine mass shooters problem as well. We’ll probably never know

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

In my neurology class Whitman was the only case of the tumor clearly being a major driving factor.

I’m not saying the class was entirely comprehensive, or that the other cases were not medically-driven. The other cases we studied were psychologically driven (mental disorders) rather than physiological (e.g. tumor/cancer/head-trauma). I just wanted to say the tumor case might not be as likely as one might think.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Thanks for your input. Where are you going to school/did you go to school? How did you like your neurology class?

Sidenote: I hope that someday we are able to look at most psychological disorders as physiological disorders. I feel like more people would get the help that they need, (and society would be more accepting of it) if we looked at it through that lense instead of thinking of it like something people have complete control over by themselves. The brain is another organ, after all

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

And with the effortless access to firearms provided in the US, choosing the “fight” option was easy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

While thats valid comment for the main post, for the Whitman case, he was in the military. Even with strict laws he would’ve still had easy access unless we’re talking drastic changes of having military personel not having general firearm access.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

First off, 1966 was a different time worldwide for firearms possession.

But for my real point, a continuous “activation” of fight or flight will always result in fight being the option, because all the running in the world hasn’t helped to that point.

permalink
report
parent
reply

That’s a pretty big possibility, hardly would call it a presumption. Either way, humans are too frail and unpredictable to have limitless access to such killing machines.

Probably had nothing to do with a tumor:

Whitman’s father was raised in an orphanage in Savannah, Georgia, and described himself as a self-made man. His wife, Margaret, was 17 years old at the time they wed. The marriage of Whitman’s parents was marred by domestic violence; Whitman’s father was an admitted authoritarian who provided for his family but demanded near perfection from all of them. He was known to be physically and emotionally abusive towards his wife and children.

This dude in Maine had tried to get a silencer. Wonder how much worse it would have been if everyone didn’t hear the reports and start running.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

This dude in Maine had tried to get a silencer. Wonder how much worse it would have been if everyone didn’t hear the reports and start running.

Hard to say. It’s not like the movies. With the firearm he had (.308 with ~14-16" barrel), a silencer/suppressor only brings the volume down from “instant tinnitus” to “still loud enough to cause permanent hearing damage”. It’s far from silent. I’d never thought about it until now but I wonder if a silencer/suppressor could have increased surviveability. When people heard gunshots at volumes they would expect, they might be less disoriented. Verses the muzzle flash and concussion that comes from what he was shooting (basically a semi-auto flash bang).

permalink
report
parent
reply

Hmm, wonder why they are illegal in the first place then. Oh yeah it’s so other people can hear the report.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Probably had nothing to do with the tumor

BRUH, this was his suicide note:

I do not quite understand what it is that compels me to type this letter. Perhaps it is to leave some vague reason for the actions I have recently performed. I do not really understand myself these days. I am supposed to be an average reasonable and intelligent young man. However, lately (I cannot recall when it started) I have been a victim of many unusual and irrational thoughts. These thoughts constantly recur, and it requires a tremendous mental effort to concentrate on useful and progressive tasks.[43]

In his note, Whitman went on to request an autopsy be performed on his remains after he was dead to determine if there had been a biological cause for his actions.

People in the 60’s didnt just say “do an autopsy on me” unless something was severely wrong. There was little to no public understanding of neurology, the general public wouldn’t even think to guess that a brain tumor could play such a role.

And not like Whitman suspected it a little bit; before the incident he went to many doctors for help. This was his note in his journal

“I talked with a Doctor once for about two hours and tried to convey to him my fears that I felt overwhelming violent impulses. After one visit, I never saw the Doctor again, and since then have been fighting my mental turmoil alone, and seemingly to no avail.”

He talked to friends about it and nobody would take him seriously because they just saw him as a respectable person with overblown concerns. His case is part of Neurology classes in Texas universities!

permalink
report
parent
reply

None of this constitutes medical evidence. It reads to me like bullshit conjured up after the fact to assuage a scared public by saying that there was something physically wrong with this man, when in fact he just wanted to hurt people because he was fucked up from years of trauma.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 510K

    Comments