Oh we should leave his kids alone cool let’s ask Hunter Biden about it, only difference being that the Trump’s actually did run a criminal enterprise for decades.

permalink
report
reply
119 points

And his children had White House jobs and clearances.

permalink
report
parent
reply
55 points
*

Jared Kushner was denied a security clearance because he’s too buddy buddy with Saudi Arabia, but Trump went ahead and gave him one anyway. Then Saudi Arabia paid kushner $2 billion for supposedly no reason. This was right around the time the Saudi royal family was at Mar a Lago for their golf tournament. You know Mar a Lago, right? That place Trump was keeping all of the top secret documents he stole from the white house.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

That’s going to be in the criminal case against, Trump. If we can connect the dots, you can be sure the prosecutors working on it for months on end will. I wonder if Trump and his circle are aware of just how much the NSA and FBI can secure in the way of intelligence for treasonous behavior. I look forward to the takedown, but Teflon Donnie will probably skate somehow.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

No reason to make that past tense. There’s no indication Trump’s kids have stopped

permalink
report
parent
reply
83 points

Oh look at Trumph pretending to give a shit about his offspring when we all know he’s going to pretend he hardly knows them the second they flip on him.

permalink
report
reply
39 points

Well, it’s not entirely fake. Instead of just wanting to fuck Ivanka, he’ll want to hate-fuck Ivanka.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

He knows Ivanka well enough to know he wants to fuck her.

permalink
report
parent
reply
76 points

They’re not children you fuck. They’re adults and you made them your co conspirators.

permalink
report
reply
24 points

I’m going to disagree with you on that one. Your kids are always your children even if you are 100 and they are 80.

The rest I will agree with.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

They are “his children” but they are not children, if you can make that distinction. In any event, he’s implying they are young and innocent and not involved, but none of that is true.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Yeah, I’ve seen this come up a couple times.

The problem is the English language doesn’t have a word that works as well as “children” when talking about your adult sons and daughters. The technical best might be “offspring”, but it has that same weird clinical sound as referring to people as “males” or “females”. It’d be like trying to use “humans” as the inclusive replacement for “ladies and gentlemen.” (That said, “humans” has a certain comedy value in its use.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Humans, you can’t live with them, you can’t drive over them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

But, they aren’t children anymore…

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Go ask your parents if they refer to you and your siblings as “their children”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I agree, but there shouldn’t be any children you fuck.

Best stick with adults.

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

He’s crackin’ . . .

permalink
report
reply
48 points

At last, orange grandpa managed to recall the best conservative line of defence: but what about kids?

permalink
report
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 16K

    Monthly active users

  • 28K

    Posts

  • 685K

    Comments