Palpatine thinks he is relevant to this.

368 points

Or what? Is that supposed to be a threat? Seems to me that if a Republican is warning you not to investigate something then it definitely needs investigating.

permalink
report
reply
220 points

I think he’s implying that exposing the corruption will bring to light corrupt Democrats as well.

Which is such a fucking typical conservative concept, as though the party should defend the corruption within by ignoring corruption everywhere. Jokes on you, motherfucker, because we want to expose and eliminate corruption among Democrats and Republicans.

permalink
report
parent
reply
122 points
*

This. Democrats are not in a cult. Punish everyone who is doing crimes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
59 points

Can you imagine a congress and SCOTUS that actually acts in the interest of the people?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-56 points
*

Democrats are not on a cult.

“Vote Blue No Matter Who” *is textbook cultish behavior and has lead to some truly awful candidacies.

The post-Obama turn from casual social liberalism to BlueAnon party jingoism has been absolutely miserable for intra-party Democratic politics. The influx of Bill Kristol / Michael Bloomberg / Lincoln Project anti-Trump Republicans is a poison pill that’s going to do the same damage to the Dems that it did to the GOP under Bush.

I’m already seeing all the toxicity and nastiness in local Dem organizing meetings that I remember my parents complaining about as liberal Republicans during the 2000-era turn.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

And the republicans will find something minor and insignificant about a democrat and make a massive deal about it as though they are equivalent issues.

Like Biden’s classified document issue compared to Trumps. Then they say, “See? Both sides are basically the same”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Tbf, some Democrats don’t want it exposed, nor will resign when they are exposed. Some will run to their yacht to hide from angry constituents and not face intraparty opposition.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

This got me curious if there were actually any recent cases of this…

permalink
report
parent
reply
63 points

Or hell be forced to stand completely still and silent while definitely not having a seizure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

No, those were strokes, not seizures.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

But, but, but… dehydration 🙄

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Is that supposed to be a threat?

“You won’t like me if I get… uncivil” is the most Senate threat in the book.

Nevermind that we’ve got sitting Senators who have body-slammed journalists in recent memory.

permalink
report
parent
reply
162 points

Dude, just fucking die already. I hope they double their efforts of subpoenas going forward. If a spotlight is cast on a Democrat, well call for their removal as well. Politics should not be a “get rich quick” scheme. You work for us, asshole, and it’s high time we reminded you/them of that fact.

permalink
report
reply
29 points

He’s never been willing to work for the American people. Only the elite who can pay for his services.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

You work for us, asshole, and it’s high time we reminded you/them of that fact.

Time to start flexing our muscles to remind these assholes of that fact.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

What muscles? Congress was created by an oligarchy to serve oligarchs and has never been anything else.

Even the new deal was just a scheme to stop a guillotine party.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

What muscles?

The sharp ones hanging off the rope with the little hole to stick your head into

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I would like to join the guillotine party.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

They don’t work for your just like Facebook or google don’t work for your, you are the merchandise they are selling.

You are being pimped out. You are being sold down the river.

permalink
report
parent
reply
100 points

Palpatine thinks he is relevant to this.

He KNOWS he’s relevant, that’s why he’s threat-begging them to look the other way.

permalink
report
reply
30 points

Oh I get what you mean but I think the word is culpable LOL

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Both, actually. His culpability makes him relevant to the inquiries 🤷

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

You are my kind of people 💯

You are right!

permalink
report
parent
reply
94 points

I get that he has to fight this, for political reasons, but this is the dumbest fucking rebuttal ever

What he’s targeting here is private citizens with no legislative purpose. I think it’s completely and totally inappropriate,” McConnell said at a press conference Tuesday

The Supreme Court is hardly your average citizen and Congress absolutely has reasons to investigate potential corrupt in the Supreme Court.

permalink
report
reply
59 points

Targeting a private citizen who was involved in bribing members of the Supreme Court of the United States. Somehow I think that second part might be relevant to Congress subpoenaing that “poor wittle pwivate citizen”

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points
*

Also, calling billionaires “private citizens” seems wrong to me. If you’ve managed to hoard enough wealth to make a Tolkien dragon envious, you’re no longer a “private citizen” in my book. If I became an immortal being when Christ was born, started saving $10,000 a day every day, didn’t spend a single dime, and STILL don’t have your net worth today, over 2,000 years later - then fuck you - you’re not a “private citizen” you’re a god damn plague upon society that should be counting your blessings that guillotines went out of style a few centuries ago. As far as I’m concerned, billionaires should be in front of Congress every day explaining why they should be allowed to exist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

should be in front of Congress every day explaining why they should be allowed to exist.

…once, until they’re entirely abolished. Billionaires are a policy failure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Congress is literally tasked with setting up the court system in the constitution. Through, you know, legislation. He’s talking out of his ass.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

also weird since he definitely thought it was worth it to probe hunter biden despite being a private citizen

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Have you seen the size of Hunter’s hammer?

I’d probe him too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

If like to be probed by Hunter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

It’s the billionaires he is saying are private citizens, he’s trying to protect his doners from humiliation

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

He’s afraid that we’ll find out he was involved in blackmailing Anthony Kennedy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
89 points

Fuck all the way off back to Moscow, Mitch.

permalink
report
reply
5 points
permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 387K

    Comments