Highlights: Former President Donald Trump relied on a Forbes article to “prove” his net worth when placing a bid to buy the NFL’s Buffalo Bills – a decade-old business move that came under scrutiny during his New York civil fraud trial on Tuesday.

K. Don Cornwell of Morgan Stanley testified in court that Trump distributed printouts from Forbes regarding the highest-paid entertainers to affirm his financial standing to Buffalo Bills executives after claiming a net worth of over $8 billion in an offer letter. The former president refused to disclose financial statements to bankers involved in his $1 billion bid for the football team in 2014.

102 points

That’s actually devious. He submitted incomplete and false documentation to Forbes as evidence of his worth and then used a Forbes article to try to convince banks.

Because submitting incomplete and false documentation to Forbes isn’t a crime and trying to use a Forbes article as evidence of your finances isn’t a crime (though it is pathetic, embarrassing, and dumb) but taking out that middle step and submitting incomplete and false documentation directly to a bank is fraud.

permalink
report
reply
32 points

That’s not really how crimes work afaik. You can’t just add an extra step and say you’re innocent. That’s like if I put a car in neutral at the top of a cliff and waited for someone else to bump into it and make it roll into somebody, then said they were guilty of murder, despite my intent clearly being murder/manslaughter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

I agree but we all know what you’ve described is exactly what trump thought.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

And it’s certainly enough to give prosecutors pause when trying to bring a case.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Right, we’re all in agreement here but it does make you want to spell it out again due to the share madness of it all

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

This type of argument is why establishing motive is so integral to criminal prosecution.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

I’m not too sure about the second part there. We can see if/how they pursue it, but I’m pretty sure using something like a Forbes article containing lies in order to lie in court testimony (or even to fraudulently enter into a contract is fraud.

He loves to skirt the line on these things. He’s watched so many mafia movies literally all of his lawyers have said that’s his technique. He doesn’t say “make fake votes,” he says “I need you to find some votes.”

That’s the level of criminal mastermind it takes to run the United States and the gop.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Because submitting incomplete and false documentation to Forbes isn’t a crime and trying to use a Forbes article as evidence of your finances isn’t a crime (though it is pathetic, embarrassing, and dumb) but taking out that middle step and submitting incomplete and false documentation directly to a bank is fraud.

pretty sure, that middle step is still bank fraud. Submitting information you know to be false is fraud. Doesn’t matter if there was an extra step or not. though the bank was pretty fucking stupid for accepting it- an that’s the crux of trump’s legal defense. (and his defense is hilariously bad.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

That’s actually devious. He submitted incomplete and false documentation to Forbes as evidence of his worth and then used a Forbes article to try to convince banks.

Post hoc ergo propter hoc

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

bless you

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

“No. I was just clearing my throat”

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

You are totally correct. I never thought of that, that man is a genius. Lying to one person and getting them to write my lies totally obfuscates my years of lying to everyone else. Simple genius.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

While you may think what I just said was sarcasm, what you may not know is that I just took an IQ test. It came back negative.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The man is just an Anna Sorokin who never got caught.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

Part of me wonders whether if the NFL would have just let Trump buy the Bills, if he would have been too busy hanging out with Ryan Fitzpatrick and Kyle Orton to run for President. Maybe us Bills fans should have “taken one for the team”…

permalink
report
reply
18 points

Yeah but hasn’t buffalo suffered enough?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Fitzy would never

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Dude went to Harvard, he knows how to pump those Ivy league connections

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Whatever else he did, he’d have probably been spending most of his time with the cheerleaders.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Weird, I thought all the failing media was “fake news”.

permalink
report
reply
9 points
*

Got your timeline mixed up Bubba.

Forbes was bigly financial media back then. Totally valid estimate of individual worth. Hell, I would’ve put it in a prospectus.

Until a Russian billionaire bought it. Now it’s fake news.*

* Trump is free to roll this back given, uh, recent, uh, circumstances. Caveat: Trump is not beholden to any sort of Russian influence. It is what it is. Coincidence. If he says that. I guess.

(Fuck me. I can’t even sustain the sarcasm and irony in this timeline. Agent 3733: Done here, punch me out, coming home. Let President Ocasio-Cortez I’ll be back for dinner.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Pretty sure “intent to deceive” is on his face every day with that horrible tanner/bronzer makeup.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 386K

    Comments