173 points

So if Iran goes full monty and China invades Taiwan while Russia is grinding down its population on the Ukrainian front, we’d have WW3 on our hands I reckon.

permalink
report
reply
119 points

That war is already underway, we just won’t be calling it that until after…

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

We won’t be calling it that until the US has a draft.

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

Drafts have not won recent wars. Wars are not PVP.

The US has made an effort to maintain a highly trained and extremely specialized fighting force. It can take over a year of training in certain specialities before you even get to the last school house.

There’s a focus on making advanced weapon systems easy to use through human factors analysis and that’s slowly transitioning into killbots that do everything but pull the trigger and need a human in the loop to authorize the kill.

During WWII there was a massive increase in manufacturing which was beyond the enemies reach. If you got drafted to do anything it’d likely be work in a plant making drones or something logistical such as transporting drones.

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

Not really a world war until 10 countries are actively involved with 2 of them USA and China.

Right now usa is passive and china is not involved.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

We’re in the lend and lease phase right now

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I could see it being called a proxy world war. There’s enough concentration of where support is coming from.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Don’t forget the middle east

permalink
report
parent
reply
61 points

Was that not covered by “if Iran goes full monty?”

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

I am sorry, I obviously can’t read properly

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Idk, there is more middle east than just Iran

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Where in the world is Iran located?

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

I am sorry, I can’t read

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Great what a time to be alive! /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

nah because no country is allowed to be a part of the russo-ukranian war as ukraine is neutral.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-34 points

And all of that because the US can’t tell Israel to stop bombing civilians in Gaza.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

Not because that wtf

permalink
report
parent
reply
-27 points

Oh yes, exactly because of that! It may seem farfetched to come to that conclusion, but only if you look at things as isolated happenings instead of in a more global geopolitical scope.

Turkey, Iran and Egypt are eager to enter the stage. Their only repellent is the US’ firm stance with Israel. But how long can this Mexican standoff be in place?

Israel has already cut Gaza in half and now they are going to increase the killings in the northern half in which still 1.1 million citizens live. The number of casualties will increase dramatically and the videos and images will ignite the region. One of the eager neighbors mentioned above might enter the stage, they might even jointly enter all at the same time.

What happens if Turkey, a NATO member, enters Israel? What are the implications of this?

China is smelling US weakness and can’t wait for something like that to happen. They will immediately proceed with their plan of annexing Taiwan.

If that happens, Russia will mobilize with full force and there you have it - WW3.

All because America couldn’t say to Israel to lift it’s finger from the trigger.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Way too broad a brush, mate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

broken fucking record

permalink
report
parent
reply
92 points

Well not so quiet anymore

permalink
report
reply
84 points

It was never meant to be covert. That doesn’t work as a deterrent. The headline means quiet as in not announced, not as In nobody knows.

Like, if you quietly left a party. It just means you didn’t say goodbye, it does not mean that you’re still hiding in the building.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

Oh but I DO hide in the building after I “quietly” leave. Then I just like sit at the breakfast table in my “borrowed” jammies and ask what’s for breakfast as my gracious host rounds the corner in the morning

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Ah, that explains your confusion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

If anything, it’s the exact opposite of covert. Taiwan has been unwisely hollowing out their military for the past two decades. These recent expenditures—not matched by corresponding manpower increases—are meant to broadcast that everything’s fine, pay no attention to the problems underneath.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

China has also reduced its military manpower. Both are going for quality over quantity.

Looking at Russia bungling their little adventure in Ukraine, maybe quantity alone doesn’t seem like the best approach.

permalink
report
parent
reply
68 points

Is there any active or potential war the US isn’t paying for?

permalink
report
reply
62 points

The US is paying because it needs Taiwan. If Taiwan didn’t have value for the US, it would have been overrun by China a decade ago

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

israel and ukraine as well. it’s no coincidence that right next to a powerful country (or, in israel’s case, a bloc of countries) that the US is unfriendly with there is a client state whose entire existence depends on Western funding.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It’s not so much that the US needs Taiwan, Ukraine or Israel, it’s that they oppose China, Russian and the middle east.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

The bulk of the US economy is based on taking money from working people and then consolidating it to billionaires that run defense corporations. So “paying for” it’s basically just an engine for making rich Americans more rich.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Are there any it hasn’t?

kind of /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

If China invades Taiwan our entire economy will come to a screeching halt. Hence why America is interested.

If China wanted to invade, idk, Thailand, we’d just kind of shrug and say “Hey, don’t do that.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Yes. Syria, Yemen, Libya.

Yemen: US funded, Saudi Led Anti-Houthi Rebels in Yemen. The Saudis fighting with Hezbollah. Wait I think we did sell weapons to the Saudis lol. The conflicts in and around Turkey. Congress has [blocked arms deals to Turkey](blocked arms deals to Turkey), but Biden has tried to make it happen. We are arming Ukraine, but not arming other countries in the former Soviet bloc that would probably enjoy more independence from Russia right now. We’re not arming Africa which aims to stop piracy, stop foreign boats from dragnetting their shores, and has some internal conflicts with governments and insurgents. We aren’t arming Mexico to stop the drug cartels. (Although US citizens frequently arm the cartels).

And don’t worry, Europe has arms to replace now thanks to the Ukraine-Russia war. US Plans to Backfill the Donated Arms.

Yeah you can pretty much look up “US sends weapons to X” and get a positive result that we have indeed. We are also actively stopping Syria, Iran, Turkey, and Russia from arming more rebels whenever we can. US siezes Iranian Ammo, Sends to Ukraine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Well, all those General Dynamics and Raytheon shareholders deserve maximum return on their investments, according to St. Friedman.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Removed, rule 4, racially loaded language.

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points
*

Well Taiwan can either go with the US or China. They’ve been wanting to stay independent from China for a while now so I don’t think it’s much of a surprise.

permalink
report
reply
38 points

Almost all countries other than USA, Russia, and China have to pick a side.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

I mean Russia is pretty close to needing to pick a side.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-26 points
*

Well, their economy isn’t collapsing any time soon. And they managed to destroy modern military systems supplied by NATO.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I mean yeah, but the EU is also an available Option

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

When it comes to military, EU is basically NATO which is led by USA.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

So US then?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

It is, but I wouldn’t count on our potential to wage an effective modern war in functional cooperation with the many countries in the EU. Especially when it is a war taking place out of Europe and not a defensive action.

A militaristic endeavor would surely be held up and manipulated by opposing countries within the alliance, just like it is now with economic decisions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’m highly biased but that seems like an easy choice, geography notwithstanding.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

Good. Even if nobody likes 'murica, their weapons work well enough to deter China from doing something stupid.

permalink
report
reply
-16 points
*

Imagine if the roles were reversed, and it was China arming i.e. Panama. How would you feel then?

(Because the USA has done a lot of "something stupid"s as well).

Edit: Folks, you can analyze the bigger picture without being a tankie. It’s unfortunate that so many ex-Redditors would rather block and report any display of critical thought

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Imagine if the roles were reversed, and it was China arming i.e. Panama. How would you feel then

False equivalence, Panama’s risk of being suddenly invaded in the current political climate is nearly zero. Taiwan (is #1), on the other hand, has to be ever vigilant. Also, Panama doesn’t house the ‘rightful’ government of the US.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

How about Cuba, then?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-14 points
*

Obviously they’re different. But failing to empathize when given the analogy shows either the inability or unwillingness to understand China’s position.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

.ml means ‘Marxist-Leninist’. From their about page:

“In particular, I would like to see someone (or a group of people) create a mainstream, or liberal instance. That should help to avoid further drama, and avoid attempts to turn lemmy.ml into something that it is not.”

permalink
report
parent
reply

As an American who knows how evil our government is, I would be like “good for panama but also China is probably not doing this out of justice and freedom”

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Neither is the US. We’re doing it because Taiwan is a strategic ally

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

If you’re comparing China/Taiwan circumstances to USA/Panama I’m sorry but I cannot call that a critical thought. The only similarity is proximity.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

That’s fine! We should not invade Panama. I don’t think the US is currently planning on it, but after the last 20 years I’m pretty sure most citizens would be fucking glad for any excuse for our military to think twice before invading a foreign country.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

The one other one is a democracy, despite being a flawed one. The other, an unabashedly totalitarian state. And before any CCP apologists comments and nevermind what the domestic Chinese think, ask South Korea, Japan and South East Asia what they think of the Chinese Communist Party claiming the entirety of South China Sea and sending armed merchant vessels and the Chinese navy bullying other Asian fishermen in the region. Not to excuse American imperialism, but it’s clear which is the better option for many.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

ask South Korea

너 지금 한국에 사는 사람한테 답하는 거야…

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Why don’t we ask South America, the Middle East, and Vietnam what they think about the US?

but it’s clear which is the better option for many

… American tax dollars are at this moment funding the genocide of Palestinians.

EDIT to add: I should clarify I’m no CCP apologist, nor do I uplift China as an example of what we should strive for. But I also really get tired of seeing America put on a pedestal. America was built on genocide, slavery, and exploitation, I don’t see how it should ever be an example of how to do things better, BECAUSE that line of reasoning (“at least we’re better than them”) has been used to justify many of the horrors of our history.

By using that bit of propaganda, you’re contributing to things like Americans looking the other way/enabling - for the past 75 years - genocide. It’s the same “they’re savages” shit that was used to justify literally the most savage acts against Native Americans.

Our democracy also isn’t actual democracy. By definition, a democracy must represent the will of the people. Ours does not. It is already a failed democracy, and has been for my entire life. America also produces more propaganda than any other country. Do we have more personal freedoms in many areas than people in China? Absolutely. Are there many areas throughout society where I think America has pushed the world forward and made it a better place? Absolutely.

But I’m getting really sick of seeing America compared to China just to say “we’re better”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Taiwan is a full democracy, not a flawed one. At least according to the widely respected Economist Democracy Index.

Taiwan is more democratic than Canada and Germany. And a lot more than the US, but that’s not surprising.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Countries helping arm one another is good. Every country should have the capacity to defend itself. My country got steamrolled during WWII because we had few and outdated wapens

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Gives me Cuban Missile Crisis vibes.

I’m not as happy that the US sells arms, but I’m convinced by the geopolitical climate that arming Ukraine and now I might add arming Taiwan is better for the world than worse. Refilling Israel’s Iron Dome is probably a good idea too, though we are yet to see what the US sends and how defensive or offensive those weapons we send are.

There might be better comparisons though in the weird chess games we played in the middle east with Russia. They armed some insurgents, we armed some insurgents, etc. Afghanistan was a disaster for Russia too, though it was worse for us.

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!world@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Community stats

  • 12K

    Monthly active users

  • 15K

    Posts

  • 249K

    Comments