Maybe (HBO) Max Just Isn’t Worth It::Warner Bros. Discovery’s latest earnings call reveals Max shed 700,000 subscribers in the past three months, even as it made money. That might work for Wall Street, but what about viewers?

112 points

I just for the life of me cannot understand why all these companies thought it was a good idea to invest the time, money, resources, infrastructure, maintenance, and so many other things into developing their own service. Instead of just pawning off their content to some other sap who has to do all that shit for you. And making them pay you a pretty penny because you know they want your content. It’s just such incredible short-sightedness from companies that are constantly just chasing the biggest dollar. Like if anyone thought about it for a minute, all these companies would see that it wasn’t worth it to develop these services. They got scared cuz Netflix made some of its own good content. But realistically, if they just calm down they would have realized that Netflix can’t make bangers forever. And they’re still going to be invested in buying content from you. These big company should have gotten together and figured out how to reduce the price of cable so people fucking sign up for it and keep watching the mass amount of fucking ads.

permalink
report
reply
53 points

“Man, selling books online is so much hassle, we’ll let Amazon do it for us…”

Borders Books, 2001.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

The difference is, Borders wasn’t creating books. They were just the middleman. It would be more like if individual publishers decided to all start their own book stores to compete with Amazon.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

To be fair, they also did a Borders Rewards program that didn’t cost anything. They didn’t change the prices of the books, but they gave them huge discounts. Which meant the 40-50% of can’t from Borders cut. And they pushed them HARD. Everyone had coupons. It was thought that this would get them loyalty over Barnes and Noble. It took maybe a full quarter for them to realize and backtrack the huge discounts, but it was too late. People used them for the coupons, and then bought everything else online or at Barnes and Noble. It was a fast track to profit loss.

Source: I worked there before the Amazon partnership, and after the board admitted they needed to walk back the rewards.

Amateurs making key decisions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points
*

At this point I guarantee it’s going to turn back into cable where you’re paying $100 a month (with commercials) for the 2-3 streaming services that survive streamageddon.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You’re absolutely right.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Yep. Costs a bunch of money upfront and ongoing to operate a streaming service, and even more to make even just an alright one. Plus you split consumers which will naturally give you and competitors fewer subscribers over all. All of that just to get paid directly instead of just getting free money, even if less per-view.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

much less per view. They tried this initially. Studios had stuff on Netflix remember? Back when netflix was worth subscribing to.

This was because netflix was just some free extra money on the side, kind of like selling a tv show to a foreign network. But then netflix ate into their actual money from network broadcast. So now they need to get serious and charge netflix a license fee for the show that reflects that.

They upped the license fees for the show and netflix just didn’t pick them up. All your favourite shows dropped from netflix and the studios had to build their own services.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

The studios did not have to build their own services. And a lot of them willingly pulled their shows from places like Netflix to build their own services. And there was enough players in the game at the time when Netflix began dropping a shows that someone else like prime or hulu was willing to spend a lot of money to pick them up.

From my point of view, even if overall it was potentially less money. That doesn’t factor in just the cost of operating your own content. They have to hire a whole new division to develop the website and app and streaming service and pay all those people. Or they could have just sold it to someone else to do all that work. And said we know what we have. We know you want friends on your service. Lol.

And even on top of that studios had no idea how lucrative streaming services were going to be. So they should have just renegotiated better contracts for the content they were selling. A lot of them ended as it was which is when they got pulled from places like Netflix. And I absolutely guarantee you Netflix would have been able to pay way more for something like Parks and rec or the office if they wanted to. Because Netflix knows just a sheer numbers game on those types of shows.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

They saw Netflix was making a lot more money from their content and wanted s piecd of that pie. Now they’re slowly realizing it takes quite a while to get there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Yeah but Netflix paid them for that content so it their fault they didn’t ask for a “fair price” or something. Also I guess they wanted to fuck over the artists by fudging with streaming numbers and pay them nothing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Netflix doesn’t pay per stream.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I’m pretty sure that’s how Hulu started. A joint venture through several companies to stream all their shows. Problem is once Disney got in everyone else tried to spin up their own and cash out of Hulu.

It’ll be investing to see what alternatives crop up one piracy makes it’s comeback.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

They all hoped their own service would dominate and incorporate all competition.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Which is short-sighted.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

why all these companies thought it was a good idea to…developing their own service.

Because they make more money?

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points
*

Once they fired the old CEO that partnered with Warner Brothers and had a streaming-first mindset, the service has gone way down hill. Most of the new content is dumb shit like syndicated reality shows.

I may tune back in for the occasional series releases like Rightous Gemstones, but then I’m out.

permalink
report
reply
21 points
*

It seems like the interface took a nose dive too. It’s a lot more sluggish and harder to find new things to watch.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

The interface absolutely became way worse overnight. You’re right about that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Geez. I’m glad I cancelled right after the new CEO took over. Fuck that greedy bastard

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

permalink
report
reply
3 points

A different kind of pirate!

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

There are difficulties with pirating. I had friends over to watch the Singles Inferno 2 finale, but didn’t have Netflix so I torrented it. The download made it to 95% before stalling. The video player on my roku tv would move on to the next episode whenever it encountered a glitch, so it was unwatchable.

I’m sure it works better for good shows, but if you want to watch trash, pirating isn’t as easy as it used to be.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Pirating is way easier than it used to be, you just can’t expect torrents to be grabbed immediately. Modern setups like an *arr stack with a bunch of configured trackers (or even better, usenet) will find basically anything you want, trash included, with enough seeds to avoid stalls. The niche stuff might need to run for a day or two, but it’ll finish.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

I’m kinda over paying for it. I really only got it for Jon Oliver and it’s basically free on YouTube so idk. Also on my computer I click on my Max bookmark and it’s like “hey we’re not HBO max anymore! Now it’s just Max! Redirecting you now…”

What? Am I going crazy? What is even the point of that.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

Rebranding is a way of indicating that they’ve done something (hopefully worth paying more for) without really doing anything at all. Great way for a new executive to make a non-decision.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

They did do something though, dropped a lot of content and added in shitty reality shows. I didn’t renew a few months ago when the price went up and the quality of content went down.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

You forgot the large price increase they paired witht he drop in quality content.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

It never was. I canceled after the end of Game of Thrones and never saw a point in paying their extremely high prices. Just like my house never had HBO growing up, I saw no need to get it now

permalink
report
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 505K

    Comments