SpaceX employees have put their lives on the line to meet the aggressive pace of work that Chief Executive Elon Musk has demanded in pursuit of a Mars mission, according to a Reuters investigation.

The report documented over 600 previously undisclosed workplace injuries at SpaceX facilities since 2014, which Reuters said are only a part of the total number that is not publicly available.

Reuters examined injury logs and public records from the company’s six biggest facilities. SpaceX had not reported much of the injury data previously, in violation of regulatory standards. The investigation also included interviews with dozens of current and former SpaceX employees.

Among the injury data that Reuters gathered, over 100 workers experienced cuts or lacerations, 29 broke or dislocated bones, 17 had their hands and fingers crushed and nine had some form of serious head injury.

53 points

The unsafe workplace environment is a result of Musk’s view that SpaceX is on the front lines of saving humanity from a deteriorating planet, workers told Reuters.

It takes a special kind of dumb to think Mars would be easier to terraform than Earth.

permalink
report
reply
20 points

the front lines of saving humanity from a deteriorating planet

The front lines of saving himself and his rich friends from a deteriorating planet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

What?? You mean he’s not planning on taking all of us?? Gasp! Splutter!

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Tbh packing all the sociopaths on a rocket and blasting them to mars is the best chance of survival humanity has

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Is he calling the new colony “Rapture” by any chance?

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
reply
13 points

A while back, I was reading about one of these billionaires talking about how they’d fly people to Mars, then they could work off their flight and living expenses by working for the company there. I wish I could see the looks on their faces when they find out that company scrip doesn’t buy flights back.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’ll take any bet that billionaire you’re referring to was Musk himself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

If memory serves, it was Bezos, but it doesn’t really matter who at the end of the day.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Also to give the rich an escape route when the ecosystem on this planet goes to shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

I mean I guess you’re alive, but living on Mars sounds terrible.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

I don’t typically wish undue agony on anyone, but if Musk and the other rich pieces of shit do end up escaping to Mars and leaving humanity to suffer trapped in the wasteland they created, then I genuinely hope that they experience the slowest, most torturous death that space has to offer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

If we can’t save the Earth from becoming inhabitable, what chance do we have of making Mars habitable? I doubt we’ll even see a self-sustaining colony off planet during our lifetimes. And it’ll cost a fortune to supply a colony on Mars, so my guess is that we’ll use a lunar colony or a space station to figure out the self-sustaining part before starting a permanent settlement on Mars.

And even then, it would still probably be the toughest kind of living humans have ever experienced.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

the only realistic long-term lunar or martian base is underground. Luna has giant lava tubes we can use - on Mars it’ll probably just be tunnels, or filled in asteroid craters. there’s no way to prevent massive irradiation from cosmic rays or micrometeorite impacts otherwise. it’s not as sexy as surface-level bases though so you’ll never see it described as such.

not sure what the draw for lunar or martian bases is though, the minerals are far easier to get to in the asteroid belt.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

save the Earth from becoming inhabitable,

*uninhabitable

We want to be able to inhabit the Earth

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

That’s their illusion, and we should stop it. The worst possible outcome on earth is better than the best possible on Mars. Terraforming Venus is actually a much more likely thing. Musk is a fucking idiot.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

This gives you a good picture of how a Mars colony under Musk would function. Aggressive objectives administratively set by an executive who has absolutely nothing constructive to contribute to those objectives, but holds not only the livelihoods, but literally the lives of his employees in his hands.

Except on Mars they won’t be employees, but indentured servants. No rights, no regulations. You’ll be lucky if you’re given enough oxygen to survive.

permalink
report
reply
12 points
*

Oxygen is not a right, but a luxury, it is not the responsibility of MuskMarsCorp to provide adults with oxygen.
Show a little self responsibility.

Edit: I didn’t think I needed an /s, but I guess I was wrong.
My statement was loosely based on something some Nestlé fuckface said about water.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

Bold of the media to assume Space X is gonna get anywhere near Mars any time soon.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Didn’t he say 2024 for boots on Mars? How’s that going?

About as well as the cybertruck?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Cybertruck has been towing things around Starbase in Boca Chica. So yeah, about as well: delayed but still under development.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
*

Colonizing Mars during this century seems so braindead to me. There are lots of issues, such as:

-Lack of substantial life support resources- it would be difficult to make oxygen or water from the elements on Mars.

-High surface radiation levels mean structures need to be underground

-It takes a very long time to shuttle supplies between Earth and Mars, and it would be unfathomably expensive.

-The tendency for humans to lose their minds in isolation means we need to use robots, develop “hypersleep”, or build an elaborate and expensive base to keep humans entertained.

-The red planet is hostile to electronics. There are miles and miles of dust to clog up devices, and high wind speeds could damage above ground structures. Wind+dust=static, which is the arch nemesis of computer technology.

Let’s start with solving climate change, living on the moon, or mining asteroids and see how it goes.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

“ I’ve definitely considered all those things and ruled them out as problems.” -Elon Musk, probably

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

You forgot radiation in between Earth and Mars. Even if we can address things planet side, there’s a long journey to cover. Also, extended periods in space leave bodies weak when they return to gravity; astronauts are carried out on cushions when they land, but there won’t be anyone to do that on Mars.

We definitely need to get moon operations down first.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 18K

    Posts

  • 466K

    Comments