3 points

Can we send Ukraine some nukes the same way?

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Wow, you’ve really got this geopolitics shit figured out

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Whyd they even need the US’ blessing? Normally the country that manufactured the arms has a veto but in this case that was Russia. So who cares?

Of course Russia would have vetoed these jets being used against them so it sounds like this 'rule ’ doesn’t always apply either.

But well done to the polish. Of course they know what it’s like to be first on the chopping block, sadly.

permalink
report
reply
1 point
*

Same reason even major powers like Germany coordinate with the US when it comes to giving Ukraine weapons: the US is the only country in the world at the moment that is completely invincible, so having it share the responsibility is a good idea

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

US invincibility was proved when they won the Vietnam War.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Defending and attacking are two different things. I meant the US cannot be defeated by an attacker.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*

It’s written in the Nitter link but Poland wanted the backing of the US in the event Russia would attack Poland. They wanted it to be an “Allied” decision as opposed to just a Polish decision.

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points
*

And where did you get those unmarked crates of R-27’s?

They fell off a truck. Now stop asking questions.

permalink
report
reply
28 points

Launch missiles and sell them to Ukraine midflight

We do a little trolling…

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

You can buy these A2A missiles in any missile shop

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

IKEA

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

This reminds me of the beginning of lend lease. Where the us and Canada built a few air strips in the middle of nowhere that just happened to straddle the border.

  1. American factory pilot would fly brand new fighter plane and land carefully on the neutral American side of the runway and drive away.
  2. Somehow, the now abandoned salvage property would get towed to the other side
  3. British pilot in Dominion of Canada gets in and flies to United Kingdom.
permalink
report
reply
11 points

Oops, I’m so clumsy, I left my plane next to your border!

I sure hope no one will take it!! Haha

🥺👉👈

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Came here for this. Need to find an island air strip where we store all the factory reject F35s to host some lost Ukrainian fishermen…

permalink
report
parent
reply
59 points

This sounds wildly implausible, or at least very exaggerated.

I’ve worked on jets. If you put them in pieces, you are talking months (at least 3-6), to put them back together. Modern jets aren’t Legos. They are very complex machines that require testing and fine tuning.

Most flight surface controls and engines parts have flight hour limits that are painstakingly logged so preventative maintenance maximizes service lifetime. When we transferred jets, we also delivered their maintenance history.

When we mothball aircraft, we only remove certain components and basically seal it up. To take it out of mothball and reassemble it, under normal circumstances, you are talking 8 months.

Maybe they surreptitiously transferred aircraft to Ukraine, I can believe that. But if they broke them down into individual parts and said, “Here you go!”, the proper response would be, “Go fuck yourself.”

I imagine this story started out one way and has just been embellished each telling.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

These are russian jets, the ak-47s of jets. You can take one out of the mud and it will still fire.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
-4 points

only reasonable comment in this entire thread.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Where does it say completely broken down to individual parts? That bit is probably intentionally left vague

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

Maybe they just rolled the jets there, took the hubcaps of the fuel inlet off of every one of them (so that they are “disassembled”) and then let ukraine know.

So still technically correct and within international arms trade law, but the jets got through without needing too much reassembly.

Maybe put some clingwrap or something over the inlet so moisture doesn’t get in.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

So still technically correct and within international arms trade law, but the jets got through without needing too much reassembly.

that’s very interesting!!

where can I learn international law regarding the transfer of military aircrafs?

permalink
report
parent
reply

NonCredibleDefense

!noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works

Create post

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be nice

Do not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a “credible” source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it’s non-credible. Random twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Low Hanging Fruit thread.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don’t care if you’re Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don’t want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified information is off limits regardless of how “open source” and “easy to find” it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody’s art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art’s source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. These include Social media screenshots with a title punchline / no punchline, recent (after the start of the Ukraine War) reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Low effort thread instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a “haha people that I hate died… haha” punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

Community stats

  • 5.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.6K

    Posts

  • 20K

    Comments