Thousands of unionized Starbucks workers will walk off their jobs on Thursday, with the one-day work stoppages coming to protest the company’s stance with shops that voted to organize, according to Starbucks Workers United.
The labor action is timed to for Starbucks’ Red Cup Day, an annual event in which the coffee giant hands out holiday-themed reusable cups. Starbucks has refused to negotiate in good faith over staffing and other issues that are particularly acute during promotions, according to the union.
“Starbucks is creating unnecessarily stressful working conditions by scheduling promotion after promotion without increasing staffing,” Neha Cremin, a Starbucks worker in Oklahoma City, said in a statement to CBS MoneyWatch. “Starbucks has made it clear that they won’t listen to workers, so we’re advocating for ourselves by going on strike.”
Because it worked so well last time that they now do it yearly.
Maybe workers should walk out yearly. Or even more often. Just to show the bosses who they rely on.
This is brilliant. Just like UAW was doing “no-notice” strikes, do an unannounced one day walkout every once in a while. Picket with signs that point out the benefits workers have achieved by striking. Not only would it remind companies of the value of labor, it would keep union solidarity strong among workers. It might even be a step towards a general strike, when such a thing is necessary.
it was so cruel working a food service job where every so often they’d do cutesy little promo days or sales days (over dumb completely made up little folk holidays or ad campaign traditions like this); they cook up this sort of faux-positive team-spirit attitude about ‘getting thru it’ or whatever, like a band of soldiers. and at the end of the day, you’re worn out, stressed, you got paid the same shitty wage you got paid yesterday, the company doubled their profits, which all go off to some dickhead in ohio who didn’t do shit, but looked forward to today like christmas
and i love how after 2020 now it’s just par for the course for restaurants to always be understaffed because it’s cheaper. this stupid fucking country is falling apart.
and i love how after 2020 now it’s just par for the course for restaurants to always be understaffed because it’s cheaper.
But don’t forget the managers and business owners complaining “people don’t want to work” and blaming Democrats, unions, unemployment benefits, and “kids these days”
Any customer crossing the picket line – or even getting a red cup from a not-yet-unionized store, for that matter – is a class traitor.
Oh no! If they walk out on red cup day, how will all the basic white women get their reusable cup that they’re gonna just post a picture of on their twitter/x before throwing it out after they finish their drink? Won’t they think of the social media influencers who think Starbucks is a high quality luxury status symbol?
That’ll surely fix it. As soon as I start making coffee at home, the several Starbucks near me will no longer have a line out the door that they don’t have enough staff to keep up with.
I agree, but…
Putting out personal boycotts as the only solution is ineffective. I do support that in general, his comment just came across to me as one of those “I wasn’t buying X anyway. Personal boycott!”. Maybe it wasn’t intended that way.
Also, boycotting Starbucks that have unionized is counterproductive. Boycotting ones that haven’t makes sense.
Would you buy eggs from a farmer that kicks their chickens because everyone else is doing it?
Or support a local Cafe that treats their workers right. Can be hard to find, but they do exist.
I’ll support them if they give me a better deal, lol.
I always find it funny how local places are like “yeah buy local buy local, it’s so important. No, it’s not important enough for us to give you a better deal.”
Things are generally cheaper when you buy more of them. It’s true that once you pass a certain threshold this isn’t as significant, but that threshold can be pretty high.
Then you get into things like commodities trading (eg buying and maybe even selling futures), which is something Starbucks engages in. It would be very hard for a small shop to participate in commodities trading (barriers of entry due to size, time in the day, etc), let alone do it well.
There’s also a bunch of little things that ar a “do it once for all stores” or “do it once for a single store”. At a mom and pop that usually means that they won’t be able to do it as well as a bigger store because of time and resource constraints.
The coffee is better than Starbucks at small cafes because they don’t burn the beans. Starbucks literally over roasts their beans so they all taste the same. Also it lasts longer on the shelf.
Good coffee doesn’t need to “last longer” because you’re going to drink it fast.
The point is that they can’t afford to shaft anyone because they’re local (ie your goddamn neighbours), so yes, you end up paying closer to the true price for your cup of coffee. Increase that even more if they ensure their produce is certified and actually equitably sourced.
Big franchises screw over others because they can afford to scale to such a degree that no one can compete with their margins and cost savings from vertical integrations.
