Nevada’s Attorney General Aaron Ford has opened an investigation into efforts by Republicans in the state to undermine Joe Biden’s victory in the 2020 election by creating a slate of fake pro-Trump electors.

The investigation, which was first reported by Politico, has been unfolding with little fanfare in recent weeks. According to three people with knowledge of the investigation who spoke to Politico, prosecutors have been interviewing witnesses in connection to the fake electors scheme, which in Nevada involved six Republicans. State party Chair Michael McDonald, who signed certificates falsely attesting themselves as certified Electoral College electors, was among them. According to Politico, witnesses who’ve been questioned include former Clark County Registrar of Voters Joe Gloria, who was subjected to threats and intimidation by Trump supporters in the aftermath of the 2020 election.

6 points

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Nevada’s Attorney General Aaron Ford has opened an investigation into efforts by Republicans in the state to undermine Joe Biden’s victory in the 2020 election by creating a slate of fake pro-Trump electors.

According to three people with knowledge of the investigation who spoke to Politico, prosecutors have been interviewing witnesses in connection to the fake electors scheme, which in Nevada involved six Republicans.

According to Politico, witnesses who’ve been questioned include former Clark County Registrar of Voters Joe Gloria, who was subjected to threats and intimidation by Trump supporters in the aftermath of the 2020 election.

This summer, McDonald and Republican National Committeeman Jim DeGraffenreid, another one of the state’s fake electors, were granted limited immunity in exchange for their testimony before a grand jury empaneled by Special Counsel Jack Smith.

DeGraffenreid’s interactions with Trump’s former Georgia co-defendant Kenneth Chesebro also appeared in the final report compiled by the Jan. 6 Committee.

Chesebro, who is considered one of the masterminds behind the fake electors scheme, pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to file false documents in Georgia last month.


The original article contains 422 words, the summary contains 181 words. Saved 57%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

permalink
report
reply
34 points

So is the machine finally catching onto the nationwide Republican scandal?

permalink
report
reply
16 points

Seems like it, but I’m pretty sure it’s too little, too late. Sure hope I’m wrong, though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

At this rate they might be ready to take action when Trump’s done with his second term

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

So, after he dies? Because that “second term” will never end, courtesy of Project 2025.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’m pretty sure that we’re stuck in the cursed timeline and Trump will never die.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I don’t know. Is there a statute of limitations?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

IANAL but generally noncapital offenses have a federal statute of limitations of 5 year. Many states follow the federal limit, but that of course varies by state.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Most crimes have a three year statute of limitations to file charges in Nevada, some four, with exceptions for especially egregious crimes like murder, sex trafficking, and terrorism (which have no limitations).

I’m looking at the actual statutes, however, and there’s no explicit mention of where conspiracy to subvert an election is concerned (or whatever they’re going to charge him with). NAL, and there’s a lot of linked statutes, so I have no idea how to delve further.

I would think the Attorney General of Nevada would be aware of statutes of limitations this long after the 2020 election.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

As a Nevadan all I can say is it’s about f’n time.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

You can say fucking on the internet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

You can also be a grownup and choose not to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Or you can be a motherfucking grown-up and fucking swear away!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s a stupid argument to say "I choose to write fucking as effing like the grownup I am.*

In the end, like Louis CK once pointed out, you’re making the readers think “oh, he means fucking,” so just commit to it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Wisconsin next!

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 388K

    Comments