9 points

Who is the dude on the right?

permalink
report
reply
32 points

A scientist at CERN.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Ah, I get the joke now. Classic

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Without mass how could you do anything else?

permalink
report
reply
14 points

Wave!

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I see you there

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Without mass you have to occupy parts of time and possibly gravity.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

39 years old… Can confirm that time is perceptibly accelerating

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Does a photon actually accelerate? Sure seems like it always goes at light speed through whatever medium from its creation.

permalink
report
reply
0 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

No, they don’t. They can get absorbed and re-emitted, and the space they are moving though can compress sideways. But they can’t make curves at all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

The fact that light cannot change speed is one of the core axioms of relativity

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

This is acceleration with no mass and no resistance to medium.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Photons are born and die at c. They experience no time and have no frame of reference.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The loneliest of experience.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The speed of light is different depending on the medium though isn’t it? So to change speed I would have thought some acceleration would have to be involved.

I have no idea what I’m talking about though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

well, if it get reflected and change direction it going to be at light speed, so it can be interpreted (probably incorrectly lol) that it “accelerated instantly to the other direction after the reflection”?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

This is an interesting question. Instant acceleration is mathematically implausible, but I don’t know if there’s a better physical interpretation for what happens to a bouncing photon. I’m guessing this is one of those “less particle, more wave” situations where the instantaneous velocity of the photon is undefined.

According to some random internet sources, reflection is the not-quite-instantaneous process of the photon being absorbed and then emitted by the electrons in the mirror.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

As a rule, it’s probably best to avoid “random” internet sources on matters of how light works because there’s so much confidently parroted misinformation out there. For example, this is completely wrong: https://youtu.be/FAivtXJOsiI See here for correct answers to that issue: https://youtu.be/CiHN0ZWE5bk

For how mirrors work see this: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/what-is-the-physical-proc/ https://youtu.be/rYLzxcU6ROM

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

There’s a hard rule about quantum physics. It goes: “it’s all fun and games until you’re at the Quantum level, then everything is all fucked up”

According to what we know, electrons don’t “move between” energy states on an electron, they’re just in one one moment and another the next. That’s so disconnected from reality we perceive it still breaks my brain.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

Photons cannot accelerate

permalink
report
reply
8 points

They do at 0m/s^2.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Acceleration and Velocity are vectors. Changes in a velocity vector are an acceleration. Therefore when photons change direction technically it’s a form of acceleration.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

I thought photons are always moving in straight lines from their perspective, and it’s space that’s bent. Unless it’s through a medium, then they just get absorbed and re-emitted, sort of.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

Space bending is a general relativity thing, which isn’t really related much to how mirrors work.

Regarding the medium bit, photons being absorbed and remitted can’t explain how light moves slower in glass. This is just an extremely popular myth. Photons are only absorbed by atoms at very specific frequencies. Also, the entire reason glass is transparent to begin with is that it’s not absorbing the photons (requires too much energy to bump the electron’s energy level so the photon isn’t absorbed and it keeps on trucking). Also photon absorption and remission is stochastic so there’s no way to control the direction it happens in or how quickly it happens. Random directions of remitted light would make glass translucent, not transparent. So for a few reasons, that’s not how it works.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Ok but photons don’t change direction either. Treating photon scattering as an individual particle accelerating due to an applied force, well that’s just not a correct description of how perturbative QED models photon interactions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

What about diffraction?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Since photons are indistinguishable, it’s hard to say too much concretely, but it some sense a diffracted photon is different photon. In order for a photon to interact with say, a diffraction grating, the interaction is done with “virtual photons”.

So for a photon to change course, aka accelerate, it does it by absorbing a virtual photon and emitting another. Whether that is the “same photon” after the interaction is kinda more philosophy than physics, at least to me.

Feynman diagrams are surprisingly accessible for how much information they contain. It’s one way to think about photon (and other particle) reactions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

There is no tree level photon-photon interaction. Photons scatter off electrons (or any other charged particle), not off neutral photons.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Not with that attitude.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

PHOTONS HAVE MASS

ANYONE WHO DOES NOT BELIEVE THEY HAVE MASS IS A COWARD

permalink
report
reply
2 points

But every time i put it on a scale, it just flys away. GIVE ME PROOF. I have a kitchen scale to offer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

MEASURE FASTER

IT MOVES REAL QUICK

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Photons can have little a mass, as a treat.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Science Memes

!science_memes@mander.xyz

Create post

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don’t throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

Community stats

  • 8K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.8K

    Posts

  • 97K

    Comments