42 points

And they still don’t know why he was fired? What the hey is going on?

permalink
report
reply
18 points

How embarrassing must it be for both sides if no one is willing to go public?
If it were something illegal, they wouldn’t be holding back. Unless the board is somehow complicit by default.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Yeah when I heard this, and after I read the available information, I was like did they walk in on him f****** a dog in his office or something? Like the secrecy around his dismissal is so total. But then all these people he has so much support within the company. Very confusing

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

You can swear here, no one is going to arrest you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

The boards job is to deliver shareholder value. Ergo, it may or may not be something illegal, all ypu can guarantee is that they think that revealing information might lose shareholder value.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

The board that fired him was that of the nonprofit, so they don’t answer to shareholders.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

They don’t have shareholders. Open AI is a nonprofit. So the job of the board is literally to do what is best for the organization, I can’t see how it could possibly be good for the organisation to fire the CEO and then point right refused to elaborators to the reason.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

To be honest the shareholder value on a non-profit is, uh, lackluster.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Official statement is that Altman was not being “candid” with the board. The current best theory I’ve seen is that Altman is investing in AI hardware startups (he is, in fact) and likely planning on having OpenAI doing business with them. buying them, or merging with them in the future.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Oh, good read. I saw that “candid” comment as well, but didn’t think of a possible connection. That makes sense. Thanks

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

I’d put money on it being about money

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Like he wanted more money and they didn’t think he was worth it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

If OpenAI actually achieves their stated goal then any amount of money he demands will be worth it. They will basically be the company that controls the world, they will have so much money that they won’t actually even care how much money they have.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I guessing he made a sex robot that went on a killing spree.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Viable theory

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

What does he want?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

The board really needs to explain to the investors why he was fired, It is utterly ridiculous that they don’t know.

He may very well have been fired for a reasonable reason, but I’m not seeing it because why would you just fire someone out of the blue and then not release a statement if you’ve got reasonable cause? The only reason to act like they’ve got something to hide is because they do have something to hide.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

If they had just fired him secretly it wouldn’t be so weird, but such open support from his co-workers and co-managers of the company and even other people resigning because of his firing are what is making me interested in the issue.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

Ars posted that there’s some evidence to suggest board wanted to chase profit over ethics or somesuch. Altman apparently did not listen.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

You have that totally backwards.

The board (which is the board of the non-profit) wanted the company to be more focused on its mission and less profit-driven. Altman is the one that’s been letting Microsoft get its tendrils around OpenAI and push a narrative that everything must be closed off and profit focused.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

yeah, recent revelations seem to point that way

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I thought it was the reverse, and Altman wanted to push forward recklessly while the board wanted to hew closer to ethical guidelines?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Thanks

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

A plague on all their houses. AI should benefit the people, not corporations or the effective altruism cult.

permalink
report
reply
9 points
*

Where is the technology in this community? Its all just industry gossip and rage-bait articles.

¯\_ (ツ)_/¯

permalink
report
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Always amusing when someone feels the need to insult me because they don’t like my opinion. Since reading comprehension isn’t your strength, apparently, allow me to explicate:

I wasn’t saying it broke a rule (and for that reason, I didn’t report it.) I was, rather, implying it’s a dumb rule and this community is basically nothing but gossip and rage-bait. And that’s fine, but I wish it didn’t sit on the c/Technology community but instead was called c/technews or something, so that the c/Technology could be about… technology. But fuck me for having preferences, I guess.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

This is the best summary I could come up with:


OpenAI investors are pushing to bring back Sam Altman as CEO one day after he was ousted by the board, according to people familiar with the matter says CNBC.

Microsoft, Tiger Global and venture firm Thrive Capital are among several of OpenAI’s top backers that are part of an effort to reinstate Altman, said a source, who asked not to be named because discussions are confidential.

OpenAI’s announcement late Friday that the company was firing Altman and replacing him on an interim basis with technology chief Mira Murati sent shockwaves across Silicon Valley.

OpenAI has emerged as the hottest startup on the planet since launching its ChatGPT chatbot last year and spurring a rush of investment generative artificial intelligence market.

Microsoft, which has invested billions of dollars in OpenAI and has a close technology partnership with the company, was surprised by the announcement.

In addition to ousting Altman, the company removed Brockman, the chairman, from his board leadership position but said he would remain as president.


The original article contains 303 words, the summary contains 164 words. Saved 46%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

permalink
report
reply
1 point

I don’t give a single fuck of this stuff

permalink
report
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 16K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 592K

    Comments