210 points

Doesn’t matter what the headlines or the opinion polls say. Vote like democracy depends on it!

permalink
report
reply
36 points

I voted for that bowl of tapioca once and I’ll do it again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

I’ll likely vote someone else in the primaries though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

There will not be a primary

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

This is the problem, DNC is refusing to hold a primary and is hell bent on forcing one of the only dem candidates who can lose to Trump upon us.

This is mostly about Biden’s ego - he thinks his legacy requires 2 terms. But what of his legacy if he loses the election, and democracy, all at the same time?! It’s madness.

Call your reps. Call the whitehouse. Demand a primary be held so this Titanic can avoid that MASSIVE orange iceberg, because it’s dead ahead right now and we’re barreling towards it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

I don’t live in the US so I don’t have a horse in this race

But it just seems like half of the people here can’t qualify Biden’s successes (and why he’d be worth a second voting for again) and the other half are just scared that Trump is on his way back and therefore the Dems need to vote like crazy to keep him out, regardless of how lacklustre his current term was.

I’ll say it here: he lost the popular vote with his unequivocal support for Israel. As a self proclaimed Zionist, he chose Israel’s genocide of Gaza over Trump’s victory and too many voters are going to remember that over whatever he’s going to promise (which so far is nothing; his campaign so far is just reminding everyone that the other guy exists).

There’s no way Dems win this one, unless Biden cedes to a more worthwhile candidate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

That’s quite the myopic view of US national politics. Biden can’t stop Netanyaho from performing escalatio on Gaza than he can force Macron to limit France’s trade coziness with China, affect the interaction between Pedro Sanchez and Catalan separatists, or require Erdogan to admit Sweden into NATO. He has influence, but he doesn’t hold veto power over a foreign leader.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Agree with that to some extent, But he obviously can denounce BB’s atrocities to say the least. The double standard between Ukraine and Palestine is sickening

permalink
report
parent
reply

That Biden can control Israel’s domestic policies is a false talking point promulgated by corporate media.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I really don’t think Gaza will be a defining issue in the 2024 election. It’s already fallen out of the news cycle and Gaza city will be under full occupation by next Nov.

Trump, however, will be in the middle of taking a huge beating by all his court cases. There’s zero chance he ever gets more support than what he had last election. The best thing we can hope for is that the GOP puts him up for another election.

Both parties have the same issue right now. Both candidates don’t have great appeal. But there aren’t any Democrats that have an issue voting for Biden. He’s been fine as president. We don’t have to worry about him going off half cocked all the time. The party will fall behind him. The same can’t be said for Trump.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

The populations of US and Canada have a memory of a frog, the people at large won’t remember a thing unless you blast in on repeat near election time.

Democrats will likely target abortion protection as it is a winning issue and message for them. Republicans might be hesitant to hold on to the Gaza issue for 10 months as it is so divisive and is best exploited when events happen, plus if pressed on what Republicans and some Democrats would do differently you’d get humming, hawing and platitudes.

If I were a US voter (I’m not) I’d try to look past any single event. Trump continuously stirred shit in the US and around the world and spent his time fellating dictators like Putin and Kim Jong Un. His administration focused on separating families at the border, eroding net neutrality, give away money through tax breaks, ample amounts of loans that were forgiven, packing the Supreme court with cronies to twist the meaning of the Constitution. Biden on the other hand put people in charge to hold corporations and anti-competitive monopolies accountable for once, strengthen labour law, did everything in his power to reduce student debt, actually managed the Covid crisis and on and on. He did bung up a few things imo like how he handled the Iraq pullout and the rail strike but those were rough situations that I could at least still put a base amount of trust in him in the future not to fuck up too badly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

half of the people here can’t qualify Biden’s successes

People are happier running around bitching because it is far easier than taking the trouble to delve into the real news. The MSM is largely responsible for it. Biden has to continue aid to Israel because it is popular. What most people don’t see is his behind the scene work of getting Israel to the table instead of the launch button. Biden has been working through Qatar to get Iran and Hamas to back off, simultaneously rounding up support for a multinational force to enforce a border between Israel and Palestine while possibly establishing a two state solution with international teeth.

permalink
report
parent
reply
78 points

Imagine thinking that Trump is in any way, shape, or form, better for you and your family than Biden.

Conservatives and Republicans: hate working class people, hate people that rent, hate minorities including women, want to privatize every last piece of American society so you’ll have to subscribe to your alarm clock and appliances.

permalink
report
reply
22 points

It’s the illusion the maga crowd clings to. They think the economy was better under Trump and they think that relates to prosperity for them. The truth is that the economy really only indicates how the market is for the wealthy. But they don’t see that. Trump, like nearly all GOP, is fully prepared to strip mine this nation of all resources possible, which would me amazing for the economy. 🙄

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Trump prints trillions of dollars. Loses election, then blames biden for fixing his mistake.

It’s fucked…

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Welcome to every election cycle since Regan. Repubs fuck the economy and blame the Dems for trying to fix it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Ah yes, the obligatory “the other guy is worse” post. We know the other guy is worse. That doesn’t mean democrats shouldn’t pick better candidates.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Well besides being old he’s not really doing so bad tbh. Who else would you put up for election? Jon Stewart?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

I like presidents who aren’t pedophiles.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-19 points

I don’t understand how they can possibly put Biden forward again. He’s well past losing his marbles. Way too old to run imo. It’s disgraceful.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Isn’t Trump in the same boat? Trump’s 77, Biden’s 81. One may easily argue they’re both much too old to be running.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Neither of them represents an acceptable choice to lead a party. That’s kind of my point.

If these are the only two viable candidates then something is completely broken and needs to change.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

That’s what we get with a two party system. The parties don’t really need to compete through better policy, simply spending more and being marginally less bad in the eyes of the voters on your side of the line is enough of a strategy for them.

If 3rd parties were viable, democrats would actually have to compete in the ways that matter, and we wouldn’t see shitty politicians like Biden as much.

But we’re not going to get that until election reform (STAR & Approval voting, ban on money in politics, etc) happens.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Age limits are something we should talk about in general, but using that as the reason to discount only one candidate is asinine

permalink
report
parent
reply
-21 points

And you think the Dems don’t? Don’t mistake pandering for genuine concern.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-27 points

So I’m supposed to vote for the genocide supplier?

want to privatize every last piece of American society

And Democrats are not doing this?

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Like it or not we are stuck with a two party system. As fucking awful as Biden is, and he is, Biden is the lesser of two evils by far. And that applies to democrats/republicans as a whole.

Both parties/candidates are to some degree cool with genocide and privatization, but only one of the two stands out as the worst, and the worst by a lot.

Don’t like it? Vote for local candidates/congressional candidates in primaries that will fix the two party problem. But in the mean time the better presidential option will be anything with a D next to their name.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-24 points

I will not vote for the party of genocide supply. Aka the dems.

Local candidates are not going fix the two party system. That’s a national issue.

I don’t know the solution, but buying into the Dems bullshit “lesser of Two evils” AGAIN is not it.

Have fun being the same chump you were 8 years ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Donald would send significantly more funds for that genocide and would help Russia with their genocide in the Ukraine. So doing some basic room temperature IQ thinking I’m going to pick the less genocidal option.

The USA is going to back a genocide regardless of your opinions. Learn how dirty your hands are and then make decisions that lessen the dirt in the future rather than digging straight into the shittiest option by trying to appear righteous.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
75 points

Does anyone not think that?

permalink
report
reply
65 points

The people who think fascism could never come here, I guess?

permalink
report
parent
reply

The people who think now is the time to make a moral stand by voting 3p

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points

Every time is the time to vote for what you support. If you did we wouldn’t be stuck with neoliberal ghouls like Biden.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Those people should probably take a look at the Nazi march that went down in Wisconsin yesterday if they think it’s not or can’t happen in the US.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

A shocking amount of news never makes it out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Wait you can lose elections? Shit …

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The Democratic party leadership doesn’t seem to understand it

permalink
report
parent
reply
-26 points

I don’t think about this ever. I’m literally waiting for one of those two worthless parties to die.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

Oh, it’s both parties are the same so I’ll do nothing guy!

permalink
report
parent
reply
57 points

Biden could have done what’s best for the country and been a one term president. I’ll still vote for him but not because he’s some amazing leader or anything.

So they did it to themselves if they lose.

permalink
report
reply
50 points

I don’t know, I think the situation is more nuisanced. I didn’t vote for Biden in the primaries (I did in the general), but I have to admit he’s accomplished a lot more than I anticipated he would. At the time I just wanted a president who wasn’t a complete train wreck.

I’d be all in if he was younger, but even so, I’m not sure what the best option is. If Biden stepped aside, I’m not sure the Democrats’ ability to win in 2024 would go up. Incumbents have an advantage for sure, and there isn’t an obvious choice to replace him. The most important thing at this point is that Trump doesn’t win. Whatever situation maximizes the chance of him losing is good with me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

the aituation is more nuisanced

You got that right!

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I agree, Newsome would have been a good candidate. Hell there are half a dozen good candidates that are half Bidens age. If Dems loose, I agree they did it to themselves by letting Biden run again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Newsom is too Cali.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I don’t totally disagree, but he’s a straight white man who is really wonky/can dive into the weeds of legislation and is affable. He has a potentially broad appeal with the coasts and Midwest.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

I see that point of view. Out of curiosity, though, do you think there’s an obvious next in line on the bench? The only person I can think of as a no brainer for electability is Michelle Obama.

Edit: I’m confused as to why my comment has been so controversial. I think it’s because people are misreading my claim. I am saying that Michelle Obama is obviously one of the most electable alternatives to Biden. The polling corroborates this. She is well liked and has 100% name recognition. Seriously, even if you hate her, as an objective empirical fact, she is obviously one of the top contenders for electability.

I am not claiming that she is likely to run or that she wants to run, etc.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Do you think, that maybe, if Biden had chosen to support another candidate, all those “Blue No Matter Who” types would dog pile people not supporting that candidate?

they’ve had four years to figure that out. That they can’t… is either a sign of gross incompetence or of intentionality. either way, at a certain point, you need to stop and realize the way it’s not worked for 30+ years is… not working and maybe it’s time to change things up a bit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*

Do you think, that maybe, if Biden had chosen to support another candidate, all those “Blue No Matter Who” types would dog pile people not supporting that candidate?

It depends on how far to the right the candidate is. Get far enough to the left, and they start bein’ like “Party Unity My Ass” and start forming PACs to get Republicans elected

EDIT: I see centrists don’t like being reminded of their proudest moment: trying to get McCain/Palin elected because they didn’t get their first choice in the '08 primaries.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

She does not want to hold public office. As you may recall she wasn’t treated very well.

permalink
report
parent
reply

At the beginning of his term, I’d have said they were lining up Harris; black, woman, young, and they made her highly visible in the first few months. I thought for sure they were going to spend 4 years lining her up for 2024. Biden would gracefully bow out citing his age, ride the 1/2 term election cycle, and badaboom: first female president.

And then she faded away. I don’t know what happened; she didn’t poll well, or do well, or polling showed D chances sank without an old white guy in front… but it makes me kinda sad, because I thought it was a good strategy, and it’d be nice to have a run of diversity in the White House.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

She was the least (or very close to it) popular candidate in the primary and people are surprised she didn’t get more popular? She is very much the definition of diversity hire, what she is checks all the boxes, what she’s done is massively unpopular to the majority of democrat voters.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I swear it’s like she freaked out at the idea of the attention and just faded out of existence. It’s so annoying cause she crushed people to get where she is and does nothing to make good use of it

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Kamala is just not good for anybody. She has a bad record of imprisoning people with similar skin tones to hers for victimless crimes and not much of substance to offer. The Diversity Hire excuse is not good enough for the office of President, there should be some good content of character within the person at least.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

They made her visible with shit no-win issues. She was put on securing voting rights, fixing the border, and recently solving gun violence. Meanwhile the big spend-money bill passes and she’s no where to be seen. I also thought the intention was for her to inherit from Biden, but then they kind of just screwed her over and over.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I’m really hoping Gretchen Whitmer runs in 28 but for this cycle it would probably be Newsome. Sherrod Brown would be great but he is the only person in Ohio that could keep that senate seat blue. Manchin probably runs off Biden isn’t there. Harris and buttigieg are"in line"but personally I can’t stand either.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Tats a really hard question. I guess Newsom or Whitmer if we’re talking politicians that seem to be up and coming. But I can think of many other candidates that I would like to see take the position even if they aren’t as electable. Tammy Baldwin, Mark Kelly, he’ll even Adam Schiff, even though he couldn’t win in the general.

Biden is fine but he looks and sounds horrible quite a bit of the time. There is nothing exciting about his policies and I feel he has way too much baggage.

Gavin would probably be the best pick. But if we’re making up scenarios, hell put Tom Hanks in there or Jon Stewart like that other commenter said.

Really I’ll always be bummed about not having Bernie but that ship sailed as well.

I’m not a super leftist, more of a left leaning no centrist. Still reason, passion, radical change for what a leader could and should be like really get me fired up. The policies are important but we all know that the president is a figurehead as much as it’s a powerful position. I’d rather see someone call the citizens of the country together and be a fighter for even the same type of incremental changes that Biden professes to embrace and maybe have a signature mission.

I do feel that his administration is chock full of smart and professional people. As a leader and a figure he’s just old and gross. Haha.

As other commenters have pointed out, anyone but a conservative would be fine. They all fuckin suck with their evangelical positioning and horrible policies. Trump being the nastiest of the pile.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Oh is that why my comment is so controversial? I specifically said for electability, not on whether she wants the job. The polling corroborates this. She is objectively one of the most well liked political figures in the US today. Note, again, I am NOT claiming she is therefore likely to run.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

What a short sighted view. Had he came in guns blazing we would have never heard the end of it from Republicans. Dudes done quite a lot without giving the Republicans much ammo.

permalink
report
parent
reply
55 points

Wake up call for who? Will the Democrats ever wake up and give their base something to vote for, instead of “hey, the other guys’s worse, whaddya gonna do?”.

permalink
report
reply
68 points

What the hell are you talking about???

The dems have absolutely given us things to vote for: infrastructure act, record low unemployment, union support with the pres visiting the picket line for the first time ever, we have the best inflation rate across all of the G7.

Yeah it’s not enough but that’s on the contrarians more than anything else.

The fuck you talking about

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

They’re repeating right wing propaganda, that’s what’s up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Sorry, they are not repeating right wing propaganda. They are going outside and having yellow, asparagus smelling, liquid fall on them. Then everywhere they go Democrats are telling them it’s not piss.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Mmmm, no. I heard that Biden and his ultra-centrist party have done nothing to stop deforestation in the Messia region of Mozambique. I’d rather have Trump and vote my conscience than allow globalists like Biden to ruin the Earth.

(just in case… /s)

permalink
report
parent
reply

Haha. Perfectly captures the tune of many Democratic voters. It’s the nature of it though. Isn’t it? The Democrats are broad coalition of like-minded but not monolithic people. The Republicans are a hive mind, cultivated and fed fat on a strict diet of outrage and propaganda media by the billionaire class.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

America is becoming increasingly radicalized on both ends, the leftists must side with the center-right neoliberal while the fascists get to vote for fascists.

It isn’t surprising to see disappointment from leftists, even if they still absolutely should vote for the lesser of two evils.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Then they promised billions of dollars of orphan killing aid to Israel, because they just can’t resist being neoliberals.

Yes, they’re better than a party full of fascists and fundamentalists, but so is a suit full of roadkill and excrement.

That doesn’t mean people need to enthusiastically cheer as we hurtle towards oblivion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Has any new aid been passed for Israel? I thought it was tied to Ukraine funding, which I know hasn’t passed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

Sure the rail road workers loved bidens support lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*

Yes.

“Biden deserves a lot of the credit for achieving this goal for us,” Russo said. “He and his team continued to work behind the scenes to get all of rail labor a fair agreement for paid sick leave.”

https://www.ibew.org/media-center/Articles/23Daily/2306/230620_IBEWandPaid

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Whatabout whatabout whatabout whatabout whatabout whatabout whatabout whatabout whatabout whatabout whatabout whatabout

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

The Civil Rights Movement?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Oh, Civil Rights. SHUT UP!

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

What country are you in? The war on drugs is still going strong in the USA.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

investing in infrastructure

The republican approved toll road bill that we got Elizabeth Warren style “let’s split it into two bills!” except only the bad bill got passed?

energy independence

Are you seriously listing Obama fracking the shit out of the midwest as a positive?? And who the fuck benefited from the US becoming an energy exporter?

college tuition assistance

The fuck are you listing this for? Who’s the one who not only refused to jubilee student debt but turned payments back on during an inflationary spike?

NATO dealing with Ukraine

What?? Again, who the fuck is the constituency for this? How is that going to change my landlord taking half my paycheck? And it’s not like Ukraine even won the war.

ending the war on drugs

??? ??? ???

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Again, who the fuck is the constituency for this?

Me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

The fuck are you listing this for? Who’s the one who not only refused to jubilee student debt but turned payments back on during an inflationary spike?

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-11-11/student-loan-debt-biden-forgives-127-billion-bringing-borrowers-relief

I mean if $127 billion is nothing to you, could you spot me a hundred billion?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Holy shit your reality is as fucked up as a qanoners. Genuinely impressive, the mental hurdles on display here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

I think they do: https://www.whitehouse.gov/therecord/

I just think the Dems suck at advertising it. Hell, I think Biden is trying for at least some student debt relief.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

You aren’t wrong, in a way. I’m nearing fifty and Biden is arguably the most progressive president in my lifetime. The problem is, that says more about the quality of presidents in my lifetime than it does about Biden, and with the climate crisis and encroaching global fascism, we don’t have anymore time to wait. The Democrats are doing more, now, because pressure from the left has convinced them that they have to, but the leadership is still dragging their feet in defense of corporate profits as much as they can. The fact that they are doing more doesn’t mean it’s time to lower the pressure - it means the pressure is working, and we need to dial it up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I don’t really agree with you, but even if I did… “advertising it” is a big part of politics! It’s called messaging, and it’s important. You have to get people excited to vote for you. They need to feel like you’re fighting for them. If you can’t manage that, then don’t blame people for not voting for you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Yeah, but there’s a couple things wrong. First, the Dems are trying to DO things, which is exceedingly difficult with a Republican Congress that can’t even agree on a speaker.

But also, DOING things just doesn’t get that much attention.

Fixing the threatening hyper-inflation after the PPP was pretty damn important, but they obviously can’t advertise that because there are side effects. Our economy is returning to being based on real shit rather than make believe Venture Capital bullshit. That’s a painful process, and of course the rich and corporations refuse to feel any of the pain (at least immediately). They’re attempting to pawn all the pain off onto the working class, partly in the hope that they’ll get more corporate tax cuts to “stimulate the economy”.

They’re getting more EVs made in America. The significant tax credit for EVs require that most of the car be made here.

They’re fixing our crumbling bridges and roads. That doesn’t get much attention, and if it does it’ll be a part they’ve failed to address.

Amtrak is building out passenger rail lines that are actually relevant to me. It’s not building metro systems in several medium US cities that need it, but it’s a start.

You know a way that’s much, much easier to get attention? Maybe the Dems should just pick a minority and spout fear and hate. That really plays much better with the public. Just put up a loud mouth who every other day spouts such incredibly dumb shit that the news HAS to cover it. That’s a winning messaging strategy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

They don’t suck. They just don’t get any help from corporate media or social media.

All corporate media is right wing media.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I also think people cling to the negatives. With student debt relief, everyone was cynical as hell at the time and still attacked the Dems.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

He’s currently failing to handle the current most pressing international issue in a way that satisfies his voter base, though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

He is, don’t think that contradicts anything I’ve said though. I’m just saying they do more than they let on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

They give money to run ads for the most insane GOP people so they can have easier opponents, they wanted Trump to win the primary because it would have made the GOP a laughingstock. Problem is over time this emboldens and normalizes this faction, and now it’s just this death spiral where they can’t change or the other faction will win, it’s like this logical inevitability at this point. Dems said it loud and clear in 2016 they will choose a candidate friendly to donors over one that could easy win against Trump.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Where’d you get this hot take? X or corporate news media?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I get it here on Lemmy anytime someone complains about Biden and they are piled onto by people saying he’s the lesser of two evils.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 387K

    Comments