Loss in terms of money or efforts. Could be recent or ancient.

180 points

China’s Four Pests campaign is a great example. As the campaign says, China had a bit of a pest problem. One of these particular pests was the sparrow. The government decided it would be a great idea to launch an “exterminate sparrows” campaign. The only problem was sparrows ate other pests such as bedbugs and locusts.

In short, they sucessfully curbed the “sparrow problem” and replaced it with a “locusts and bedbugs problem”. This ultimately upset the ecological balance and further lowered the rice yields. It was a complete disaster

permalink
report
reply
35 points

Sounds exactly like a China thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

I bet lemmygrad would explain how it was actually a good thing, especially for the sparrows.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Like how Florida is going to teach how slavery benefited black people

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

One of the best examples of unintended consequences, aiding in one of the largest human caused disasters.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Chinese_Famine

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

I like to call it “The Great Stumble Backwards”

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Followed closely by the cannibal revolution

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Another good example is when the Soviet Union dammed the Aral Sea in order to create irrigation canals for cotton and other produce in the region. It worked at first and they had a huge economic boom, but this is also one of history’s most prominent examples of “Ecological Collapse”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aral_Sea#Irrigation_canals

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I mean, they did produce the cotton they wanted…

It’s less an example of a blunder and more an example of how few fucks the Soviets gave about being “green”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points
*

The great leap forward was such a colossal clusterfuck that you can’t blame it on any one thing (although most of them would be prevented without the authoritarianism). Literally everything was wrong. Sparrows, lysenkoism, forced collectivization (basically, and perhaps ironically, farmers not owning the means of production), Mao just being evil, backyard burners, rigid chain of command that gave the chairman absolute authority but at the same prevented him from knowing what was going on, everything.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I vaguely remember reading about that when I was younger. I don’t know if it’s true, but this is what I read.

The peasants and farmers were made to stand in the fields throwing stones at the sparrows, preventing them from landing. The thinking was that the sparrows would die from exhaustion, if they weren’t killed by the stones.

What actually happened was that the existing crops were either trampled or broken by the stones, and as the farmers weren’t working the fields, nothing grew the following year either.

Like I say, I have no idea whether it’s true, or if it was just 80’s anti communist propaganda, but it’s stuck in my head ever since.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

The “why don’t we just…” school of public policy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

I’d be shocked if they could actually throw that many rocks, but the basic idea is that the policy didn’t work as intended, and that’s correct.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Sounds similar to what we did in Australia.

permalink
report
parent
reply
168 points
*

Brexit. As historical blunders go, this has a beautiful unambiguous purity.

permalink
report
reply
23 points

I agree, but unlike usual blunders this was very much planned!

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points
*

Once the campaigns were underway, yes. But the opportunity came from a huge blunder by David Cameron. He called the referendum expecting an easy win for the remain side that would silence the anti-EU faction in his party and shore up his position as PM. Instead, the anti-EU faction won, prompting his own resignation and causing damage to the UK’s economy, a loss of global influence, the loss of British people’s right to live and work in the EU, and reopening difficult issues in Northern Ireland that had been laid to rest for years. It also arguably sped up the Conservative Party’s lurch to the right and its embrace of UKIP-like policies, disempowering Conservative moderates and leading to the spiral of ever less competent governments we have seen since then. In particular, Boris Johnson’s rise was a direct result of post-referendum power games among Conservative politicians.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

So what’s David Cameron up to these days? I’m sure such a massive and unnecessary screw-up has landed him in dire personal straights. /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I didn’t keep up with this at all (I’m from across the pond) and I wondered why Brexit was even thought up in the first place.

It’s so sad to see conservatives fucking things up over there too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
104 points
*

We’ll there was that time Kublai Khan tried to invade Japan with the largest amphibious assault in history (until D-day) and got absolutely wrecked by a typhoon.

Then tried again a few years later, with an even larger force, and got wrecked by another typhoon.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongol_invasions_of_Japan

permalink
report
reply
44 points

You can’t leave aside the fact that those typhoons were called “Divine Winds”, or kamikaze.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

This kamikaze was far more effective than the later one, though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I doubt if it counts as a blunder, but thanks for sharing anyway.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Their blunder was using disgruntled Chinese labor to build their ships. It turns out that conquering people makes them rather upset.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It turns out that conquering people makes them rather upset.

It can, but sometimes they hated the old bosses even more than your imperial ass.

permalink
report
parent
reply
97 points

Twitter

permalink
report
reply
19 points

The Las Vegas Loop.

(known on dictionaries as a tunnel)

And nobody have died there yet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

oh that’s not a blunder, that was intentionally a flop to prevent California from developing a high speed rail network

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

You may be confusing the Las Vegas Loop and the Hyperloop. Las Vegas Loop is the shitty tunnel you drive teslas single file through in Las Vegas, Hyperloop was the “vacuum tube frictionless train replacement” that was used to reduce excitement about the high speed rail proposal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

You mean X?

permalink
report
parent
reply
84 points

Do you guys remember that time u/Spez took the reddit API away from third party apps?

permalink
report
reply
20 points

Unfortunately most reddit users didn’t even notice. Or just don’t care.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

I hope the Redditors that didn’t care about the whole thing never find their way here. I can’t imagine being that apathetic about something you use daily.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Eh. I wouldn’t hold that against them. Reddit or Lemmy is just social media. Just one small aspect in people’s lives. Pretty hard to care about something like Reddit taking away API access when you’ve got much more important things like a job, a social life and a family to care for. Even harder when you only use the official apps.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I wish it had the same effect as version 4 of digg. He is probably still over there, editing posts he doesn’t like.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

Nobody cared. Only reddit addicts and power tripping jannies, who all seem to have migrated here.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Asklemmy

!asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Create post

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it’s welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Icon by @Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de

Community stats

  • 9.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.4K

    Posts

  • 301K

    Comments