71 points

That’s dumb. I understand restrictions on uncooked meats, but what harm could a cooked chicken breast do? This is what happens when officials blindly enforce rules without understanding the purpose of the rule in the first place.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

It’s a genuine biosecurity risk in Australia. Australia (and NZ) are very susceptible to pathogens from outside so this kind of thing is taken very seriously in both countries.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

It’s a genuine biosecurity risk in Australia.

A cooked chicken sandwich? And letting in people who’ve eaten the sandwiches isn’t a biosecurity risk? Hmm. I’m questioning the genuineness of the concern.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You probably shouldn’t let any people in then.

“Nope, don’t worry about that. It’s the chicken sandwiches that are the problem.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

You should be thankful it’s cooked.

If it’s undercooked? Believe it or not, straight to jail.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That’s dumb. I understand restrictions on uncooked meats, but what harm could a cooked chicken breast do? This is what happens when officials blindly enforce rules without understanding the purpose of the rule in the first place.

Overcooked? Also jail.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points

Brah so we should test all chicken breast coming into the country to make sure it’s cooked? Who the fuck is paying for that? Or maybe you just don’t bring a fucking chicken burger on the plane…

permalink
report
parent
reply
73 points

It’s a case of common sense. Obviously an accident, obviously cooked. Throw it in the trash and move on with life. You crazy black and white maniacs that think every rule has to be applied 100% in every case with no possibility of anything ever happening that maybe doesn’t make sense or isn’t the intention of the people who wrote the rule are like 50% of what’s wrong with society.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I have a feeling the granny probably pissed someone off along the way. I’m sure sometimes it gets thrown away and everyone moves on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

As a German I feel deeply insulted.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

You and I obviously have no idea what happened at the security gate, or the extent to which she tried to argue about it or hide it. I’ve travelled in and made mistakes in the past and the result was a stern ticking off. I suspect there was more to this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-24 points

Us crazy black and white maniacs is why Australia doesn’t get to enjoy the wide array of pest and dieses the rest of the world has.

Fuck this gandma and her chicken burger. Entitled people like her are actually what’s wrong with society.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

If you can’t tell the difference between raw chicken breast and a piece of fried chicken on sight, please don’t ever work anywhere near the food industry.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

If you don’t know chicken can look cooked on the outside but be raw on the inside please don’t ever work anywhere near the food industry.

permalink
report
parent
reply
59 points
*

“Chicken meat poses a significant biosecurity risk to Australia, particularly the risk of highly pathogenic notifiable avian influenza (HPNAI) virus which can cause severe disease and mortality across Australia’s poultry industry, and may also affect wild bird populations.”

We do have a reputation for taking these things very seriously, as we should. We were even going to kill Johnny Depp’s dogs at one point but settled for the “hostage video”. Despite that, it does seem excessive in this case and should have been overturned on appeal at the very least.

Thankfully someone stepped up and ended up paying the fine on their behalf.

permalink
report
reply
21 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Great, then declare it and there shouldn’t be any problem. Where the problem comes in is people not declaring it. If it’s hidden somewhere in their luggage or on their person how is anyone supposed to know that?

Granted it is harsh in this case which I already said but customs has no interest in letting people skirt the rules just because.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Who in their right mind would think they need to declare a sandwich?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Real talk, how did they find it if she didn’t ‘declare’ it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

We were even going to kill Johnny Depp’s dogs at one point but settled for the “hostage video”.

Let me guess, it’s because he was rich and famous.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I think it was more about sending a message. In a way yes because he is famous, but in the way that they wanted to leverage that as a deterrence. It wasn’t about “letting him off the hook”. It was about using him as a platform to say to the world “we do not fuck around when it comes to this”. If you’ve seen the hostage video you know what I mean 🤣

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I have not seen this hostage video.

Is it easy to find?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

In Australia under a rightwing government? No, they wouldn’t have given a shit about that.

It was because he broke biosecurity laws. Something we take seriously here after witnessing how rabbits, foxes, and canetoads fucked up the environment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

We were even going to kill Johnny Depp’s dogs at one point but settled for the “hostage video”.

That was just Barnaby Joyce grandstanding and making a big deal out of ‘we apply the rules to everyone, no matter if they’re rich or famous’. No fucking way he would have ever laid hands on those dogs. The man was and still is a fucking embarrassment to politics and Australia.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Agreed and I made a similar point in a few of my other comments. If you look at the original context it was more of a “well you have to abide by the rules and the dogs should be quarantined but if you’re not willing to do that then we would have no other option”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

And what I got from other commenters is that their countries hate pieces of gum and shrivelled blackened oranges. It’s not unique to Australia although as an island nation especially prone to biosecurity threats we do have a reputation for taking it more seriously. It’s not a difficult thing to get caught with if you’re paying any sort of attention. You can make mistakes and accidentally (or even purposefully) bring stuff in as long as you own up to it. There’s signage everywhere explaining in words and pictures what is and is not allowed. The custom agents ask you. There’s literally every chance to declare.

It’s not as harsh as it sounds, it’s only when you get caught that it becomes a big deal. It’s like if you got pulled up by the cops. If you try and lie or simply don’t even recognise that you were speeding you’ll probably get a ticket. The analogy breaks down in the “admit fault” side of things because the cop can ticket you anyway, where under our biosecurity law you cannot be punished for declaring goods that would not be allowed in.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

deleted by creator

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Do you have a passport? You shouldn’t visit Europe either - similar restrictions

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Yep no meat no dairy. Which also applies to the UK, yet another Brexit dividend.

The chance that any random sandwich carries something nasty is small, but there’s two other factors: a) If it does carry something nasty, the implications are huge and, certainly not least, b) you don’t need to bring a sandwich. Noone needs to bring a sandwich. Get one once you arrive. And if you just can’t stand airline food then be vegan for a couple of hours it won’t kill you. Live solely off chocolate during your flight if you want.

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

What shitty article. No explanation of anything. Get this shit out of here.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

ChatGPT at your service kind Sir.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

Granny shoulda watched that show, “border security: Australia”

permalink
report
reply
24 points
*

To make it worse, we have our own in New Zealand, which is the (worldwide) original of that format. The Aussie series is a spin-off.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Border_Patrol_(New_Zealand_TV_series)

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Funny thing is, NZ is actually stricter on this issue than Australia.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

That’s a chicken burger in the picture, love when there’s an article about aus/nz but using American nomenclature

permalink
report
reply
1 point

It even converted to USD. But for real y’all call it a chicken burger?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-18 points

Burger is ground meat and chicken sandwiches are often made of whole meat. Cheapo ones are mechanically separated which would count as ground, but the one in the photo is not.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

Over here if it’s on a bun it’s a burger, if it’s on sliced bread it’s a sandwich, simple as

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Precisely this. American terminology applies in America only.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

A Cuban sandwich is on a bun, is that a burger? Same goes for cheese steaks and French dips and subs, served on buns, is burger?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

What about sandwiches made with rolls and bagels?

Also, I see the aussie point, but, in the US, burger is short for hamburger, which refers to the meat itself. Do you only say ground beef too? Or is ground beef also called hamburger?

And also… Is a burger not considered a type of sandwich?

I hadn’t heard of this dialect difference. Fun stuff!

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

nope we’d call that a burger in aus/nz

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!world@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 272K

    Comments