AI Art Generators Can Be Fooled Into Making NSFW Images::Nonsense words can get around DALLE-2’s and Stable Diffusion’s filters
Well, since anyone with a decent computer can install Stable Diffusion locally, this isn’t news.
And even if you can’t, there’s mage.space, albeit if you wanted NSFW it’s $5 a month, but my point is there are other options if you really want it.
You can install SD to your own machine and have no such restrictions in the first place.
Eh, not always plausible. I got it to work on a 2GB card, albeit very slowly, but that was apparently dumb luck.
Actually, it may have been some form of wizardry in the third-party drivers I was using, because now I’ve got a more powerful machine with a better card, and things are about as slow, but with weirdly more “out of memory” errors.
You’d think, but my 8gb card running in med vram and low vram was still crashing occasionally. Darn AMD, get your AI shit together haha
Well, there’s the niche for human artists in the future: drawing things the AIs refuse to generate.
Or being a sorcerer with the arcane spell that makes the image machine spit out boobies.
People say that AI will kill us all by ordering too many paperclips.
So people try to make AI safe by stopping it from making images of nude people.
WTF is wrong with everyone? Am I stuck in the most boring Lewis Carroll story ever?
First up is it really that important that perverts can’t make ai tits. Two the fact that the only reason it can’t make porn is a prompt filter that must mean that there is porn in the training data. Why did they use porn in the training data if they don’t want porn coming out of it.
“The fact that it can make cats eating spaghetti must mean there are cats eating spaghetti in the training data.”
Literally the whole point of AI image generation is that it can make things NOT in the training data. I’m sure the data contains enough porn-adjacent stuff for it to generate quite a bit of what most people would consider porn.
