286 points

Cool. So what’s he gonna do about it? Or was this it?

permalink
report
reply
104 points

What can he do about it? We live in a free market society. All he can do is keep talking about it and hope the people get the message. Rebellion will start at the consumer level and go up, not the other way around. Main problem is the millions of people that rely on Fox for their news.

permalink
report
parent
reply
154 points

Use the anti monopoly laws we have in place to prevent price gouging from lack of competition

permalink
report
parent
reply
139 points
*

He issued an executive order in 2021 to do just that, among many other things to promote competition. There has definitely been an uptick in antitrust cases since then, and inflation has also decreased significantly.

https://www.justice.gov/atr/antitrust-case-filings

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

lets add taxing the shit out of people who do this to the list.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

How would you like the President of the United States to do that? Do you think the President is a dictator that can just unilaterally pass sweeping legislation? How do you think the public would react if the President had the power to directly determine the prices of goods? How do you think that would go in general?

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Damn there is nothing the government can do. Sorry guys :( You’ll just have to buy less food, and maybe then the corporations will get the hint!

Regulations? Laws against price gauging? Naw, they can’t do that. It’s the consumers that are at fault!

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Do you think Biden makes the laws? Did you fail civics class? I said nothing about enacting laws making what these companies are doing illegal, I only said Biden can’t do much about it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-20 points

Poor Biden can’t do anything, he doesn’t have any power lol….

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

Do you know basic US Civics, or…? Biden has the bully pulpit (basically what he’s doing here), and that’s pretty much it. He can issue executive orders (and has in the past about this), but those are often complete bullshit that’s unenforceable, and will be removed by the next person in the office.

Take a look at Trump rolling back Obama’s EPA purview over waterways in the US for a recent example that has left over 60% of our nation’s waterways now unprotected.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

ok. but this is factually correct

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Do you want a dictatorship or something? Congress writes laws, talk to your members of congress.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Price controls are well within the president’s powers. It’s not that radical of a concept.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

It’s within congress’s powers for sure. I don’t think the president. Congress has done it in the past though, so they for sure can again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points
*

Price controls are an extremely radical concept, themselves. Last thing this economy needs is further distortion.

The sucky thing about inflation is you have to run through it like an illness.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Why is this upvoted?

No, the president of the United States cannot unilaterally implement price controls on goods without the involvement of Congress. Price controls typically involve changes to laws and regulations, which fall under the legislative branch’s authority. Congress would need to pass legislation granting such powers or specifically authorizing the president to implement price controls in certain circumstances.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

In what country?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The US was pretty good about taxing corporations before Reagan

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Biden can’t set tax rates.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-12 points

You know… He ‘hit’ them apparently.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Oh and passed an executive order, along with having his justice department pursue more antitrust cases than any other administration.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

It will be harder to pass new laws in the current Congress, but he still has control over the executive branch. Hopefully some existing laws could be used.

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points
*

He appointed the most aggressive FTC head in decades who is using the antitrust law we have to currently go after Google and Amazon.

She’s also fighting a merger between Kroger and Albertsons, which would drastically raise grocery prices.

The FTC is also fighting the hedge fund buyout of preciously independent healthcare clinics, which has massively ramped up medical costs.

Not to mention breaking the real estate agent fee monopoly.

His executive branch has been busy as hell trying to help people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Don’t tell us facts. We’ve already decided to believe whatever the fuck we want regardless. /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

I mean, you wouldn’t want the politicians to lose their legal bribes generous donations over acting in our interests instead of the corporations, would you?

Will someone please think of the rich folks pockets?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

How is it possible that people don’t understand the implied “/s” here??? Or am I missing some other reason for the downvotes?

FWIW, I thought your comment was great. Gave me quite a chuckle! :-D

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

It’s because I said bad things about Biden, even though I was talking about politicians as a whole. But you can’t say bad things about Biden or be any kind of critical about the current administration without getting trashed on here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Because this is just more of that “enlightened centrist both sides baaaaaaad” bullshit that dumbasses invoke whenever they want to diminish the power of one side, thus actually strengthening the other side, while claiming that they don’t care about sides at all, even though they just can’t stop themselves from only sputtering it out when it’s the dems doing something.

And after trump if you still believe both sides are the same then you are certifiably brain dead.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

How is it possible that people don’t understand the implied “/s” here???

They understand it and are angry because they’re being called out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

He’ll hire their execs to run various government agencies

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points
*

that was basically it. short of siccing the irs on them there’s not a lot the executive branch can do about it… of course that’d kill the golden goose named “campaign contributions”, so it wont happen

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

siccing the IRS on them

Nothing the IRS can do, either.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Windfall taxes is a thing they can use. If companies raise their prices too fast the excess profit gets taxed at a higher rate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

No. Just stop with the disinformation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-19 points

All he can do is back out his limp-dick economic policies that are destroying the country and creating this problem…but there’s no chance of that.

This damage is literally the point of the policies. What people don’t understand is that he’s doing this on purpose.

permalink
report
parent
reply
59 points

Corporations: lol no

permalink
report
reply
11 points

He probably went to go buy his own ice cream for the first time in 3 years and said “holy shit.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

A year too late

permalink
report
reply
36 points
35 points

You know what’s funny about these kinds of posts is the type of dude you’re replying to literally NEVER comes back to say “shit, my bad”.

Like, I don’t get it, someone corrects me anywhere and I’m like “thanks, bro, appreciate the correction”…but I’ve never seen these dudes do that.

Wonder why?

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Because this is how they all operate

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

someone corrects me anywhere and I’m like “thanks, bro, appreciate the correction”

If you regularly respond this way, you’re in the minority. Most people respond to a correction emotionally, as if their authority or competence were being attacked when one mistake was pointed out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-73 points

Yeah, it’s totally nothing to do with his policies.

permalink
report
reply
34 points

You are correct

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

Give us one fucking Biden policy that caused this

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

🦗

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

Shutting down the Keystone XL pipeline and restricting domestic oil leases almost immediately increased the price of gas by 20 or so cents.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

How the fuck is that related to price gouging? Are you having a stroke?

permalink
report
parent
reply
54 points
*

You are correct. Most of the world is experiencing price gouging and inflation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Its just something that happens and there is nothing we can do about it. The market is like the weather sometimes it rains sometimes it pours.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

so no one can influence the “weather” here?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

You almost sound like you’re in favor of market regulation. Yet, somehow I very much doubt that is true.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

What policies, specifically?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

Sending hundreds of billions of dollars to fight the war in Ukraine, for instance.

What, you thought we actually HAD hundreds of billions of dollars? They’re all just printed from thin air and added to the national debt, and then inflation goes up as a result of the increased money supply.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Could you share where you got your number? The most recent source I found on google showed $44.2 billion in military assistance to Ukraine since the invasion began. From what I can tell this doesn’t include other humanitarian aid, so I wonder if that makes up the difference?

Whatever the case, if you have more info I’d appreciate it if you could share

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

Corporations after seeing how Black Friday netted over $9.8 billion: Uhhhh…no. According to these numbers, people LoVe the prices!

permalink
report
reply
4 points

That’s almost 10 billion of sale prices though, for products they literally needed to offload.

And while a record amount, it was only 7.5% above normal, coming off all this Covid stuff it’s no wonder people are cutting loose and splurging a bit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

7.5% … Wasn’t that the rate of inflation recently as well? Not sure what it is at now, but we were getting up there. Higher prices wouldn’t necessarily mean a new record, I am guessing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

As far as I can tell it’s just people being “savvy” and waiting for the big sale day.

Black Friday e-commerce spending popped 7.5% from a year earlier, reaching a record $9.8 billion in the U.S., according to an Adobe Analytics report, a further indication that price-conscious consumers want to spend on the best deals and are hunting for those deals online.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Not the current rate of inflation. Inflation over the year from October 2022 - October 2023 was 3.2%.

To get to 7.5% you’d have to go back to the year from November 2021 to November 2022.

Our month to month inflation is currently about flat, meaning there was no change in prices from September 2023 to October 2023. But sometimes there’s a jump one month or a drop the next, it’s a little uneven, which is why people talk about the entire past year summed up. It’s a confusing way to phrase it though, because if you just say inflation was 3.2% in October, people often assume that means prices raised 3.2% in October. What it actually means is prices raised 3.2% over the entire past year altogether.

Anyways this is a true new record. People’s spending increases for black Friday are outpacing inflation.

https://www.cnbc.com/2023/11/14/cpi-inflation-report-october-2023.html

https://www.usinflationcalculator.com/inflation/historical-inflation-rates/

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Above normal. The data suggests US citizens still have credit limit or not feeling the pinch as all the news articles suggest.

I was expecting a big decrease this year according to what I’ve seen on lemmy. From now on, I’ll read negative news and say “meh, probably not.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It isn’t just lemmy, there’s plenty of external evidence showing that people think the economy is in a bad state. Changing your entire perspective because of big spending day on black Friday makes no sense.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

That was $10b in online sales, not total.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Or they just know that Americans would rather go into significant debt, than having a lighter Christmas and/or buying less for a year or two.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

First of all “lighter” does not mean “sad”. I remember, growing up, there were a few years where our parents would tell us that Christmas was going to be a little “lighter” this year due to whatever financial reasons that they didn’t want to burden us with. They were lovely every time, and there was absolutely nothing “sad” about it.

Second, you are presenting a false choice:

So it’s sad Christmas and lots of debt, or regular to light Christmas and still crushing debt.

It could just be a financially responsible Christmas where you learn to appreciate your family and loved ones. People will often make homemade gifts instead of buying them, and those are often far more memorable than many pricier gifts.

As someone who has been consistently been paying down debt (student loans mostly, but some CC thrown in there), it hasn’t ever stopped me from enjoying Christmas.

And this is coming from someone who isn’t even really a big Christmas fan to begin with. It’s fine. I just think you presented an absurd dichotomy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’m glad I have friends who can live without needing presents every year to feel validated on keeping a friendship alive.

I keep hearing other people just tear themselves apart because they worry about “ohhh I need to go shopping next week!” or “I can’t figure out what this person wants who barely gives a shit about me but I need to gift them SOMETHING!”

Like damn people, is it worth it that much to gift someone things at the cost of your own sustainability?

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 18K

    Posts

  • 468K

    Comments