I just discovered Kobold Press’s Black Flag Role Playing system and Tales of the Valorant game being made. I had no idea that was a thing.

Added with the ones I did know about:

  • Critical Role’s Daggerheart
  • MCDM’s new RPG (Matt Colville’s company)
  • And we can count the Pathfinder 2’s updates if we want

I wonder how many other RPG’s are being made as a result of that debacle.

It does seem like a lot. WotC really shot themselves in the foot spawning all this new competition, didn’t they?

24 points

What’s truly funny is that this isn’t the first time this happened. 4th edition had WotC bamboozle third party creators by fiddling with the OGL, and third party creators responded by making a rival to D&D. They called it Pathfinder.

Then you look a little further afield and you see a massive indie TTRPG community that I have to assume had an influx of new designers who only found out about it due to the OGL incident.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

TSR had the exact same issues back with 2.5 edition. That’s how WotC even managed to acquire the property.

permalink
report
parent
reply

@AngryCommieKender @Susaga Eh, I wouldn’t really call TSR’s issues in “2.5”/late 2e similar to the issues surrounding the cancellation of the d20 System Trademark License, the 4e GSL, or this past January’s OGL debacle. For one thing, the game never officially had an open license before 3e came along. For another, late TSR’s woes had more to do with their reach exceeding their grasp.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

They didn’t have a license, true. What I was referring to was them getting sued happy, for good reason in a lot of cases, because people were slapping “Gary Gygax’s D&D” on homebrew modules and trying to sell them. Got them a lot of bad publicity, and they ended up selling.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

I hope many.

I tire of D&D’s stranglehold on players minds. It’s slowly getting easier and easier to suggest people read a second book, and while that’s great to see, we still have plenty of work to do.

And, no, for the 11th time, I will not run my Star Trek game in 5e that’s insane.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Star wars 5e mod (i hope that’s the name) is dope as hell. They ran it for a season of Dimension 20, it looked really fun if you like the crunch.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Star wars is about sword-wielding space wizards, so it’s not exactly a force leap off from DnD

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I would say they are closer to clerics both mechanically (with the spectrum of martial to magical subclasses) and flavorwise

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Are you using the official Star Trek TTRPG? I definitely want to run something with the Lower Decks book for my party at some point. Maybe next First Contact Day

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Star Trek Adventures? Yeah! It’s a great book. It takes a little bit to wrap your head around, as it’s a little abstract in some places, but once you get it, it’s simple to play and works very well for emulating an episode of Star Trek.

I had used Mongoose’s Traveller in the past, but ST:A is a far better system for the purpose.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Wasn’t Kobold Press making 3pc for Pathfinder a while back? I’d swear I’ve heard of that company before

permalink
report
reply
4 points

They did! Our GM at the time was super into the stuff they were putting out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Well, one way or the other, more entities in the system development space is only a good thing. Praying that someone makes a system that feels as good to build detailed, unique character concepts in as Pathfinder with a slashdown on the amounts of bookkeeping required so people quit being intimidated by what used to be my favorite system.

Ever since my last Pathfinder group fell in on itself, the circle I run with now absolutely won’t go near it-- say they’d rather stay on 5e because Pathfinder ‘needs too much notetaking’ and I’m just here like “oh you DEF haven’t played Shadowrun before if you think PF’s bad about the bookkeeping”

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

WotC really shot themselves in the foot spawning all this new competition, didn’t they?

They can do that as often as they like. This is great!

permalink
report
reply
3 points

I don’t think any of these were created per se from the debacle but certainly it helped grow them and maybe push timelines up.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

I can’t speak to the creation of new systems, but it certainly gave me the push to try existing alternatives.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Paizo’s modifications to Pathfinder 2E are a direct response to the OGL debacle. They’re tearing out all the stuff that was only in there because they were still chained to the SRD.
Like stats only counting when you had two of them so you have to take them two at a time or else it’s a waste.

permalink
report
parent
reply

rpg

!rpg@ttrpg.network

Create post

This community is for meaningful discussions of tabletop/pen & paper RPGs

Rules (wip):

  • Do not distribute pirate content
  • Do not incite arguments/flamewars/gatekeeping.
  • Do not submit video game content unless the game is based on a tabletop RPG property and is newsworthy.
  • Image and video links MUST be TTRPG related and should be shared as self posts/text with context or discussion unless they fall under our specific case rules.
  • Do not submit posts looking for players, groups or games.
  • Do not advertise for livestreams
  • Limit Self-promotions. Active members may promote their own content once per week. Crowdfunding posts are limited to one announcement and one reminder across all users.
  • Comment respectfully. Refrain from personal attacks and discriminatory (racist, homophobic, transphobic, etc.) comments. Comments deemed abusive may be removed by moderators.
  • No Zak S content.
  • Off-Topic: Book trade, Boardgames, wargames, video games are generally off-topic.

Community stats

  • 399

    Monthly active users

  • 371

    Posts

  • 2.1K

    Comments