The wife of the New York judge overseeing former President Trump’s ongoing civil fraud trial is the latest target of Trump’s rage online.

Trump took aim at Judge Arthur Engoron’s wife in a series of posts Tuesday afternoon, purporting that an account on X — formerly Twitter — that made several anti-Trump posts belongs to her.

0 points

What’s the point of having legalised guns

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Squirrels

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Oh yeah forgot about them

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

To stop the British.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

He could shoot her in the middle of 5th avenue and the judge still wouldn’t enforce a gag order.

permalink
report
reply
17 points

If I were going off these posts alone, I would conclude that trump immediately violated the gag order today?

I mean it’s very believable…but I’m hoping it’s just weird timing of the posts and he stfu for at least a couple hours.

permalink
report
reply
17 points

Probably not. The gag order is extremely narrow. It excludes Engoron himself and I don’t think his wife is court staff.

According to the article, Trump also posted that yesterday.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Oh this will end well.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

For him? I guarantee it.
What other consequences has he ever faced for anything he’s said, other than a gag order he knows they won’t enforce?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

From April

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points
*

Definitely a great strategy to go after the judge’s wife in a bench trial.

And again, it shows that Trump is just above the law. If anyone else did that they’d be in Rikers for the remainder of the trial.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

Trump’s lawyer to appeals court judges after verdict:

“Your honor, my client and myself constantly, publicly and viciously attacked the trial judge, his staff, the opposing counsel, and their families, including making many demonstrably false libelous statements. They all received many death threats on a daily basis as a result of our actions. Therefore you must overturn the verdict because he must have been biased against us by our own actions.”

Yeah we’ll see how that plays out in the appeals courts. I didn’t think even republican partisan hack judges will buy that. We’ll find out soon I guess though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I’ve seen chutzpah defined as “that quality enshrined in a man who, having killed his mother and father, throws himself on the mercy of the court because he is an orphan.”

Same energy here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
100 points
*

Trump basically wants this judge to snap and or get really harsh with him. Even though the judge would 100% be in the right, Trump will use the harsh penalties as miscarriage of justice ammo in an appeals case.

IMHO, this guy needs to continue doing what he has mostly already done. Don’t take the bait.

Edit: typos

permalink
report
reply
10 points

take the bate.

I think that’s what Louis C.K. said before he’d do what he did.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

the 'bate?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

the hash bate

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

No appellate court would side with Trump. It’s for his base.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

No sane court would. But the last president appointed some real kooks to a lot of courts.

I could see Trump trying to get an injunction against the ruling pending appeal. Even a sane court would need to allow time for discovery, arguments, etc. Any material (in the way of snark or comments from the judge could mean added delays. Trump would definitely slow walk the appeal as much as possible on the hope that he’ll get reelected and pull some nonsense to wriggle out of consequences.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The appellate courts are already shooting him down.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 451K

    Comments