0 points

So I’m confused. I saw this and initially thought it was just a matter of circumference. Suppose the radius of circle A is 10 and the radius of circle B is twice that amount, so it’s 20

The formula to find the circumference of a circle is C = 2πr

So for circle A;

2π10 = 62.831

And for circle B;

2π20 = 125.663

Then to find the difference in circumferences, divide them

125.663/62.831 = 2.000

Therefore, it should take two rotations to rotate one circle around the other

What am I getting wrong here?

permalink
report
reply
8 points

You could just watch the vid you know

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

There’s one extra-rotation from an external perspective due to the revolution of one around the other. So the formula is r1 / r2 + 1.

This extra-rotation doesn’t appear from the point of view of the circles, or if you consider the circles as two stationary gears

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points
*

Booooo

This video didn’t give the correct answer in any place reasonable. I just wanna know the answer before you go off on an 18 minute lecture.

To anyone who just wants to know the answer without watching the whole video, the correct answer is 4

https://www.nytimes.com/1982/05/25/us/error-found-in-sat-question.html

permalink
report
reply
2 points

How did this video stretch out to 18 mins?
I remember a mindyourdecisions yt video about this from several years ago that showed it in a couple of minutes and why it is n+1.
sorry i don’t remember the url though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It explains the answer is 4 before the 5 minute mark.

Part of the reason is because it goes into the story of the SAT being wrong and a student being the one to catch it, which I found interesting.

After that it mathematically proves it several different ways and then shows how it relates to some real problems in astronomy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

He spends the first 5 minutes explaining the answer is 4, but the question was also worded ambiguously that 3 and 1 can also be correct answers.

Maybe watch the video, it’s more interesting than you’d think

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

Godamn thats a phenominal example of reletivity.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

I did not watch this video but did read about this math. Visualize the larger circle unwrapped into a flat line, and the smaller circle sliding along the length of the line so its bottom point is fixed to the line. You’ll see the small circle never rotates. Now slide the small circle with a point fixed onto the large circle in the same way, and you’ll see the small circle makes one complete rotation. That rotation happens in addition to the rotations you get from dividing the larger circumference by the smaller circumference, so the answer is 4 in this case

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Wouldn’t it be 3 = 6π/2π ?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Watch the video, it’s explained.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

This should have been an article. What’s the summary?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

if the path had been straight yeah, but the path itself rotates 360 degrees, which gives us an extra rotation

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

This finally made it click. Thanks

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Now that is mind-bending trickery! Having a degree in applied matha millennia ago did not help…

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

This is the comment that finally enlightened me

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Thank you

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

The center travels 2π per rotation but need to travel 8π because the path of the center of the small circle is a circle 4r the radius of the large circle plus the radius of the small circle. It would be three if the center of the small circle traveled along the edge of the larger circle but it’s edge to edge.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

That’s what you’d think, but there’s an extra rotation involved in the act of the small circle moving around the larger circle rather than along a straight line, so it’s (6π/2π) + 1

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

I just watched the video, that’s really interesting. Thanks for the explanation

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Satellite operators have to use this equation for orbits.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

VG video. Confused by the word ‘revolve’? How many times does the Earth ‘revolve’ around the Sun in a year?

But, worse yet, there were THREE correct answers … none listed!

permalink
report
reply

Videos

!videos@lemmy.world

Create post

For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!

Rules

  1. Videos only
  2. Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
  3. Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article.
  4. Don’t be a jerk
  5. No advertising
  6. Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)

Community stats

  • 4.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.1K

    Posts

  • 14K

    Comments