“It’s called precedent,” the Senate Judiciary Committee chair said of violating the same rule that Republicans ignored to move forward with judicial nominees.

233 points

It’s about time Dems started using the same tactics the GOP uses. Whiny hypocrites can’t stand when the tables are turned.

permalink
report
reply
66 points

Still I understand why they hesitate. It basically drags our government permanently into shitty behavior. This is why they don’t start this stuff but reluctantly utilize it. You don’t want to be known as the guy going for the balls but if that is how the opponent is going to fight whelp then I guess we are ballers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
69 points

Democracy is a fist fight. I’ve grown tired watching Democrats spend their time wringing hands and clutching pearls.

THIS? This is good stuff. Get in the fray, fight for what’s right, for us, for results. I’m enjoying this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

This is a good opportunity to do it, and very calculated. Skipping the discussion portion would have no impact as it wouldn’t have changed the vote, and it’s the third discussion, so two already occurred. Its a “safe” way to demonstrate rules can’t be dodged by one side.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Nope. Same rules should apply for both. They should not be the least bit reluctant to use the same tools the Republicans do. If the Republicans are breaking rules then the Democrats need to break the same rules. If the Republicans don’t like it, they can stop breaking the rules whenever they feel like it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I think until anyone in government sees consequences of their actions then nothing will change. If it’s used against them, maybe they’ll help legislate against it

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Holy cow! Is that where the term ballers comes from? I did not know that. I kinda assumed it was about pro basketball players, in reference to their wealth and success.

I get to reevaluate so much pop culture now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

no no. certainly not. I often sorta joke around with use of language, especially in regard to modern terms like that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

Hear fuckin hear my friend! It’s about damn time!

permalink
report
parent
reply
162 points

When Blackburn said again she wanted to talk, Cotton interjected, “Now I guess Sen. Durbin is not going to allow women to speak either. I thought that was sacrosanct in your party!”

Man, they thoroughly do not understand equality.

permalink
report
reply
82 points

The GOP leadership consists of extremely manipulative sociopaths; they will say literally anything to benefit themselves or hurt others. They will weaponize anything with no shame and no hesitation. Everything they do is in bad faith.

Equality? They understand it but don’t want it. Equality and fairness is the opposite of what they aspire to. They view themselves as better and therefore rules should benefit them and hurt others, to paraphrase the well known quote.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

“The GOP leadership consists of extremely manipulative sociopaths”

A-fucking-men.

Understand this and you understand everything the GOP leadership says. It’s never good faith, ever.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Why would I want equality when I’m better than all these assholes?

—any republican

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

They are not fools. They are evil. We will be fools if we do not internalize that reality.

permalink
report
parent
reply
58 points

They understand. They just know if they say the shitty thing, it will give their bubba voters a misogyny hardon, which translates directly to votes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I don’t get it: are they saying that their party doesn’t let women speak and now Democrats are acting like them? It seems extremely backwards.

The question is mostly rhetorical, I understand exactly what’s happening, I just can’t help but jackie_chan_face.jpg

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

They are saying, “women dumb, lololol!” They’re literally just petty children in adult bodies. There is no deeper point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Right, if conservative women weren’t fucking stupid (which they have to be to be conservatives), they’d know he was admitting Republicans don’t care about them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s not about that. It’s about stuff like Clearance Thomas does. He used to be a black panther fighting for black rights(was still a misogynist creep). Then he eventually switched sides, prob for money and power, but claimed the Dems were just as racists as Republicans, but Republicans said it to your face and Dems hid behind a facade.

The right continously parrots this narrative (which definitely has a kernel of truth especially with NIMBYs) in an effort to either discourage voter participation or to get lucky and get Pick Mes like Thomas and Candence Owen’s.

Same reason idiots claim Trump says it like it is; they think everyone really is as racist and sexist as themselves, but that Dems are just virtue signaling while their side is “honest.” They don’t want to change, learn, or hide, they just want their shitty beliefs to be mainstream again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
126 points

“Cotton got so mad he started talking about himself in the third person.

“Mr. Cotton says the chairman needs to rethink his decision,” said Cotton, as his name came up in the roll call. “That’s what Mr. Cotton says.””

Lmao imagine getting you mad about the same tactics you supported, that you refer to yourself in the 3rd person.

permalink
report
reply
36 points

I think from that point on I would refuse to call him any thing other than Mr Cotton, and always in a drawn out child-story like way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points
*

Mr. Cotton: “How dare you use Mr. Cotton’s dirty tricks against Mr. Cotton!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

Mr Cotton is getting upset!

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I can’t. It seems like an oddly specific trait of his.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Trump does it too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Hm, didn’t know it.

Googled it and it seems like not precise, just a sliiiiight marker they can be narcissists. Not convincing at all. Being a politician and with GOP tho…

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Bob Dole used to do it. Back when he was alive, I mean.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

George is getting upset!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Doesn’t donnie do that all the time?

Though I wonder if he does it from habit due to all those years pretending to be John Barron, etc…

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Cotton’s pronouns are Cotton and Cotton. I wonder how Teddy feels about that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

To be fair, you’d get a bit confused if you killed fiddy men too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
77 points
*

That’s weird. When the right is gaslighting others about injecting deeply radical activist judges into the system, they claim that judges should just be calling balls and strikes and so on. And now they are screaming about what are most likely center-right judges, LOL.

The butthurt is strong with the GOP, that’s for sure.

permalink
report
reply
32 points

once you assume that everything they say and do is about manipulating the system to gain as much power as possible, then using that power to reward loyalists and inflict violence on people they don’t like, everything starts to make sense. at this point the republican party is an attempt at a junta in the US.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Once you realize that they don’t give a damn about the rules you know how to deal with them.

Vote all of them out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

They just have no morals only self enrichment. They aren’t butt hurt, they are evil.

permalink
report
parent
reply
72 points

This article totally misses the point: they didn’t care about the judges. They were trying to run out the clock to prevent subpoenas of major conservative donors to the Supreme Court from getting out of committee.

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/4335581-senate-gop-stages-hearing-walkout-to-protest-supreme-court-related-subpoenas/

permalink
report
reply
21 points

Republicans generally count on news media missing the point of their shenanigans.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Clarence is trying to fuck around without finding out. I hope he finds out.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 385K

    Comments