1 point

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The fact that many Americans might prefer other candidates, much ballyhooed by such political sages as Karl Rove, will soon become irrelevant when millions of Republican voters turn out to choose the person whom no one allegedly wants.

Until now, Republicans and conservatives have enjoyed relative freedom to express anti-Trump sentiments, to speak openly and positively about alternative candidates, to vent criticisms of Trump’s behavior past and present.

Abraham Lincoln suspended habeas corpus, the Wilson administration shut down newspapers and magazines critical of the war; Franklin D. Roosevelt rounded up Japanese Americans and placed them in camps.

There is every reason to believe that active-duty troops and reservists are likely to be disproportionately more sympathetic to a newly reelected President Trump than to the “Radical Left Thugs” supposedly causing mayhem in the streets of their towns and cities.

The power shift at the federal level, and the tone of menace and revenge emanating from the White House, will likely embolden all kinds of counter-resistance even in deep-blue states, including violent protests.

As Mitt Romney recounts in McKay Coppins’s recent biography, Republican members of Congress contemplating voting for Trump’s impeachment and conviction feared for their physical safety and that of their families.


The original article contains 6,008 words, the summary contains 201 words. Saved 97%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

permalink
report
reply
145 points

And yet people keep telling me that Biden needs to lose so that Democrats can be “taught a lesson.”

permalink
report
reply
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

Yea this is probably correct. The braindead MAGATS think they’re smart. But they’re just incels who know nothing about economics.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Fuck Trump, but tbf people shouldn’t be allowed to be in office if they could die tomorrow from old age.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

It’s hard to understand for a non American, how it can be a Race between these two and only these two. This two party system seems so absurdly stubid. Not that we have it figured out anywhere else much better, but still.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

I mean, any president can die in office to be fair, regardless of age, hence we have a vice president to take over in such a case

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Isn’t Trump only like 3 years younger? By yhe end of his term he’d be older than Biden would be at the start of his.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Remember when they tried to be sneaky with the “walkaway” shit before the 2018 midterms? 😂

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Or they’re accelerationists who think a dictatorship will wind up in a civil war, and the “true” society, whatever their concept is, will be able to rise from the ashes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

“First Hitler, then our turn”

Actual slogan of the German Communists under Thalman

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

I do worry that Biden will lose though. He was far from a popular candidate to begin with and his support of Israel’s genocide of Palestinians has made him even less so. In many ways the best outcome might be for him to die in office prior to the election or for him to lose the primary. It would hurt the Democrats to have a non-incumbent running, but possibly less than running Biden. The real wildcard though is if Trump will even end up on the ballot considering his legal issues.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

I do worry that Biden will lose though.

Good. Everybody should think this. Thinking Trump can’t possibly win is how he won in 2016.

We need to behave as if it’s a real possibility, even if you feel optimistic about next year.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

We need to behave as if it’s a real possibility, even if you feel optimistic about next year.

Party leadership should also be doing this and doing what they can to win voters. Instead, the only message I’m hearing is “if you breathe so much as a word of discontent, it’s because you’re a Russian troll who wants Trump to be dictator for life.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

100% this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

It would hurt the Democrats to have a non-incumbent

If Biden were not on the ballot next year, the Democratic candidate would be Kamala Harris. No mainstream Democrat would challenge her in 2024, the optics would be horrible.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Mmm, I doubt it, even other dems don’t like her very much right now

I’d want Gretchen Whitmer to go for it,

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

Ah yes! Enlightened Centrist and Libertarians. They will always vote GOP no matter how horrible the candidate is with some shit reason to not vote Democrat. OR they will vote for some numbnuts third party candidate with an equally shitty reason.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

The common talking points these days are either, “DeMoCrAtS aRe FaScIsTs, ToO!” or, “DeMoCrAtS nEeD tO eArN mY vOtE!”

And I’m sure the next generation will thank them for taking an ideological stand right as Fascism is trying to take over. /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Democrats are fascists, too

Special emphasis on “too”, of course

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

We act like Democrats actually doing something to earn votes is impossible.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Too many Democrats are to be sure. But not all democrats. Sanders and others have shown the way to fix this. The biggest issue is that we need younger people involved and running. In my state many Republicans run unopposed for several offices. As bad as it sounds. I would reflexively vote for any Democrat over a republican knowing nothing about either of the two.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

problem is your thinking lead to us getting to this point in the first place. y’all should have learned candidate quality matters in 2016 and it’s your fault if biden loses because he was your idea in the first place

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Don’t vote Democrat, vote third party I hear! Me, I’m like well with first past the post voting this is impractical and could help empower fascists to take over, but let’s see what options we got.

/opens box of third party candidates, before gently closing it and walking away

Yeah no, Biden still best option, these guys are nutters. It makes sense though, a sensible candidate would run in the democratic primaries, rather than hurting their own purported causes by running in the general in a first past the post election. It’s why you saw Bernie Sanders, an independent, running in the democratic primary, and not out there helping to siphon votes to fascists by running as a third party in the general against Biden.

Anyways, let’s focus on continuing to empower politicians that want to improve our voting system (usually has been democrats, though with an exception in Alaska). This starts at the local level, but we’re getting more and more federal offices now with ranked choice voting. Once you have that, then better quality third party candidates will follow, knowing they can fairly safely run without harming their own causes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Biden can be the best option for you, and it can still be imperative that we vote third party. If you think the dems and repubs are ever going to give up FPTP, you’re insane.

State ballot access is a big deal that can impact local elections as well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Unfortunately, there are few leftists that push the same narrative, too. And all because Biden (or Obama, or Hillary) are not the pretty pony they think they were promised or something.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Point of fact: Clinton’s centrists were so upset that they didn’t get their very first choice in 2008 that they formed a PAC to try to get McCain/Palin elected. And they’ve been screaming “no matter who” ever since.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I show up to vote against Brownback and in support of abortion. Then I vote against every incumbent and to fire all the judges.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Why can’t democrats run a better candidate?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Because the party isn’t going to defy the incumbent president. This should be obvious.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

It’s not obvious, please explain why not. He’s worse for their chance of winning.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Voting is a chess move, not a love letter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Absconding with that quote.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Ok you’re being out played when your best move is vote Biden

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

They all ran before the 2020 election, people mainly liked Biden. (I voted Bernie). The time to get a better candidate than Biden was then, changing things up would be a huge risk for Democrats and would help Trump (R’s can’t easily say Biden is insane and take their away their rights, unlike a new candidate which they can say is the bogeyman). This is the exact same reason Trump ran basically unopposed for his 2nd term, its generally the best idea in the US’s system vs picking another candidate. If you care about how “bad” Biden is, then vote in the next general and help out the best candidate.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Depends how cynical you feel today.

IMO it’s either:

  • The DNC believes anyone too progressive will get stomped in the general election

  • Don’t forget, Dems would be conservatives in most other countries. As much as I hate to say it, I’m not convinced most of them aren’t just as beholden to corporate interests as R is.

OR

Probably a little of both of those actually. Also, maybe a dash of - boomers are going to control our politics until a bunch more boomer voters and boomer politicians die of old age.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

They can and I wish they would, but it’s too late this election. Anyone else would have two weeks or so to get on the ballot and get name recognition and get people to like what they’re doing. Not really sure that’s possible.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

We already learned that lesson - in 2016.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-21 points
*

Biden needs to deliver on at least one campaign promise - be a 1 term President, and drop out of the race now, so we don’t risk the election.

His ego, nor the desires of his donors, are not worth sacrificing democracy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Wait, you not only want him to be a one-term president, you don’t even want him to finish his term? We get President Harris until 2024?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

Your ability to fly has come at the cost of your reading comprehension I see.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Your wish is granted.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Is Lemmy really loading whole images when loading a site, even though I can’t enlarge them? What a good way to waste data.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

what does “reignited the WHO” mean? some of these are so vauge as to be meaningless.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

The way that talking point gets pushed unusually hard by an unusually dedicated few using the same stupid arguments looks an awful lot like the kind of psyops campaigns I’d see when I was on Reddit during the Trump presidency.

The real long term solution is changing how we vote. Star Voting or some form of Ranked Choice. That’s how I respond along with https://fairvote.org so, in case some impressionable soul happens along, they aren’t taken in by such silliness. I encourage others to consider doing something similar.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

People have no idea how to move the overton window.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

My Roman Empire is remembering how the shitheads screamed and yelled denying responsibility on the day Dobbs came down.

Was grocery shopping with my grammy and had to pull the most hemmeroid passingly determined poker face in history to not break out into cursing them and their obvious waste of what privileges they live with to be in the position of treating this like it’s teaching the DNC a lesson.

Fucking Priv Shit Vote Karens, every last one of them, “Take me to the party’s manager right now or I’ll let the fascists take away even more of your rights!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

it’s because of people defending biden’s atrocities. like, there’s more than one person you can run, and most of the options could poll better vs. trump.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Such as?

permalink
report
parent
reply
110 points
*

Polls a year out are meaningless. Obama was also “losing” at this point before his re-election.

Nationally, Democrats have been beating polls by 9+ points at the ballot box since Roe v. Wade was overturned.

Reminder of what an absolute shit-bird Robert Kagan is.

‘No rational person would believe a word Robert Kagan says about anything. He has been spewing out one falsehood after the next for the last four years in order to blind Americans about the real state of affairs concerning the invasion which he and his comrade and writing partner Bill Kristol did as much as anyone else to sell to the American public.’ - Glenn Greenwald, Salon.

Kagan is one of the shitheads that got us to this point. He’s now concern-trolling us about how we shouldn’t bother opposing Trump.

permalink
report
reply
60 points

I completely agree but I would just like to point out that Glenn Greenwald is also a massive shithead.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Yes, he absolutely is, but he was also correct in that particular assessment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

EXACTLY. I’m getting tired of these doom and gloom articles from journalists who know better.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Either the media wants a horse race or they absolutely don’t know how to poll post Roe v. Wade.

Probably both.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Or they’re consistently polling only LAN lines.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

At this point, I think it’s advantageous for anyone who is set in their decision to lie on polls and say you’d vote for the opposite candidate in the hopes of making that side complacent and light a fire under your side.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Nationally, Democrats have been beating polls by 9+ points at the ballot box since Roe v. Wade was overturned.

It’s really surprised to me how quickly this dropped from political discourse and analysis. We’ve had several off year elections and the midterms now where Republicans have underperformed. Polls have largely seemed to miss this trend.

There’s a lot of reasons to be hopeful right now. Republicans can’t control their messaging on abortion, and it’s very clear voters are unhappy about bans. Yet, Republicans in the House are only barely aware of it, and in the Senate you’d think they hadn’t seen any results at all. Tuberville’s continued hold for abortion reasons, while voters have made it clear anti abortion advocates can go fuck themselves, is remarkably visible. I don’t think it’s a mistake that Republicans are signaling they’ll bypass him if he doesn’t budge. Elections a month ago make it clear it’s a millstone around their necks.

We have an advantage to capitalize on, but it only matters if we press the advantage. We have to show up en masse to the election.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Moreover, the Democrats need to get their messaging together. Hammer in that THESE ARE THE PEOPLE who overturned Roe, who are currently cratering Florida and Texas, who allowed COVID to run rampant. Hammer in Tuberville blocking military promotions, hammer in Johnson and McConnell both effectively refusing to do any of their jobs, hammer in Trump nearly getting us into a shooting war with Iran (remember that assassination we carried out during a peace conference?) Remind the voters who exactly Trump is, what exactly he’s done, and what exactly he’s stated he’s going to do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Obama was also “losing” at this point before his re-election

Obama was about 46% and trending upwards at this point, Biden is 37% and trending downward. This is a pretty nice visualization of historical presidential approval ratings plotted with Biden’s. Takeway is while other presidents have tanked way harder (Nixon, Dubya, HW), Trump and Biden are basically tied for historical unpopularity on a consistent basis. Biden did hit mid 50s as he came in to office where most presidents get a bump, Trump didn’t even reach 50.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Just because he’s a neocon piece of shit doesn’t mean he can’t be right. Also, dude, Glen Greenwald is no fucking saint either. That guy is a certified scumbag. At least with Kagan there’s a chance that he actually believes his bullshit, whereas with Greenwald, we know he’s an intellectually dishonest grifter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Polls are meaningless when nobody answers the phone and/or they call people who don’t actually vote. Kids today know to shut up and beat the shitbags at the polls. We are collectively punishing the Republicans for 40 years of attacks against our society.

permalink
report
reply
5 points
*

There is a reason that no poll I’ve ever responded to has ever straight up asked me who I plan on voting for in the next election.

They can spin your feelings, They can’t spin a simple yes/no question.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Push polls are the only ones I’ve ever gotten, and those seldom and not for a long time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Dang I didn’t notice that before. I was polled once and they only asked me what I thought of my current elected officials not who I planned to vote for.

Guess it wouldn’t get clicks if they were honest

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

When does this brinkmanship dilemma stop occurring? How long are dems gonna get a blank check to spit in our faces because republicans are a looming threat? Is MAGA gonna be gone in 2028? 2032? When is the income gap gonna stop accelerating? Or emissions? When are houses gonna be affordable, or education? What about the situation is supposed to improve if dems win 2028?

permalink
report
reply
-5 points

Democrats would rather lose and have someone to blame than try to win voters over.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

You get downvoted for actually expecting something from your vote. I’m sorry some 1/100000000 chance of a president becoming a dictator isn’t going to make me want to vote for someone who doesn’t want to fix economic problems for the middle class. Do better and winning the presidency would be a cakewalk do the bare minimum and possibly lose to Donald Trump.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Voting for local elections is more important than president. Some flavor of socialist could win a local election. You are fooling yourself if you think a socialist could win presidency in the upcoming election.

Also why should Democrats care about someone that doesn’t vote? What you want them to lose 2 votes for you…continuing to not vote?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Who said anything about not voting?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Voting records? I don’t know you, you don’t know me. Great 😃👍 most people don’t vote. You play football, you’re going to get concussed. You involve yourself with politics, you’re going to have to come to terms with people doing things you don’t want done. You’re the only you. Other people close to you won’t have 100% the same politics. Waiting till you clone yourself will solve nothing.

If you want to make the changes that you want you’ll need to get people who don’t vote to vote. If all that happens is they vote during the presidency and know nothing about anyone else, then they are probably going to at best vote down ballot. Dems are better than Republicans. If my only choice is between Dems and Republicans, I’m going to vote Democrat. There was an election recently that I voted in. The only vote that was happening was for mayor. It was between Dems and Republican. There is no alternative.

Winging about how much the Dems suck is going to motivate no one. People aren’t even going to get angry enough at the Dems when you say they suck to do anything. They’re not going to protest, they’re not going to vote, they’re not going to get involved. You are at best wasting your breath when you say the sky is blue.

Argue for mandated voting. Argue for something different than first past the post. Argue for a politician. Hell, argue for a fascist takeover so debate bros can “dunk” on you, they’re at least doing more that what you’ve put here.

The things you complain about will keep happening until you DO something. Argue about doing something.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 463K

    Comments