“For most markets where DoorDash operates, customers are prompted to tip on the checkout screen, with a middle option already selected by default. If they want to, they can adjust the tip later from the status screen while awaiting their food, or even after it’s delivered. That’s changing today; while blaming New York City’s minimum wage increase for delivery workers, DoorDash announced that for “select markets, including New York City,” tipping is now exclusively a post-checkout option”

It seems so ridiculous given tipping fatigue, that DoorDash is making what should be a given sound like a negative.

1 point

I DoorDash regularly. I frequently get offers so low that it’s not worth it in gas+time to deliver them. There’s a chance that a lowball offer will tip me after the fact, sure, but it rarely happens, probably only one time in ten.

If the initial offer doesn’t tip, and not just tip but enough to make it worth it relative to the travel distance and time, then I don’t accept it. No experienced driver would, and no driver should.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Yup same, my bare minimum was 9$ on the guaranteed screen so that worked out to about a 6.50$ tip from the customer (Assuming DDs totally reasonable 2.50$ base pay…)

Ofc I also maintained 1-2$/mile minimum (depending on my mood lol) so if you aren’t within a couple miles that guaranteed order amount would need to increase accordingly.

DD should just call “tips” what they really are, a blind bid.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I can do both! Doordash really REALLY should pay more. But also, practically, I can’t take offers that are not worth it economically to do so. And I can only decide to do that with the information I’m provided before I take the offer.

I’ve been asked to drive a total of 24 miles (12 miles there and back) for $3.75 before.

permalink
report
parent
reply
232 points

This is the way it should be everywhere. I’m sorry but tipping before the order is even delivered creates a fucked up incentive with the drivers and the people getting food. Especially when apps like DoorDash make it very apparent. Who tipped well before they even pick up food. The tip should always be rendered after service.

permalink
report
reply
203 points

The tip should be rendered never, people should be paid a living wage.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-73 points

close but not quite. Tips are given for excellent service. It’s an extra added bonus for going above and beyond. It should not (and as far as I’m concerned) is not used to pay a person’s base wage.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-33 points

You’re just cheap.

permalink
report
parent
reply
77 points

Minimum wage at restaurants in my state is $2.13 an hour. In such cases, it absolutely is used to pay someone’s wages, which is fucked up, IMO.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Honestly, I completely agree with this.

Tipping should be a bonus, something that happens once in a blue moon. Not the norm.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Your statement is accurate and reasonable for servers, who are employees of the restaurant, and are guaranteed to earn at least minimum wage.

But we are talking about delivery drivers. Drivers are generally contractors, not employees. There is no minimum wage for contractors. Further, contractors are responsible for their own expenses. The IRS says a mile of travel costs $0.655. DD typically pays a base rate of $2 per delivery, whether around the block, or 20 miles away. That $2 fee covers 3 miles of expenses, which is about a 2-mile delivery, plus travel to the store.

Typically, the driver ends up paying all of the base pay in travel expenses. The only part of his compensation he actually gets to keep is the tip.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’m fine with a tip for over and above service, but otherwise yes I agree.

Worth noting that this will absolutely destroy the gig economy (which I’m kinda also fine with, tbh) and things like food delivery we see today. There is a reason very few businesses delivered prior to the delivery apps.

permalink
report
parent
reply
73 points

This has always annoyed me about food delivery services. Tips are supposed to be reflective of the service delivered. How can I know if that service is going to be good before a driver is even assigned to my order? Prompt after the delivery to add a tip.

Secondary note, if a company cannot pay their employees a living wage without tips than said company shouldn’t exist. Nobody should have to rely on tips to…you know…exist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Tips are definitely not the answer, but…

if a company cannot pay their employees a living wage without tips

Actually, where I live, we don’t have a tip, but companies won’t even if they can. The sad truth is that businesses won’t without pressure. They just call it a social problem, weakness of their country, whatever.

It’s a false assumption.

Again, I believe tips are not the answer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

I should not be effectively bidding for better delivery service. Lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Wat. If an order isn’t getting delivered (your words):

if a driver sees no tip, your order is last in line if it gets delivered at all.

Than that’s an even BETTER reason that tipping should 100% be eliminated.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

So, I deliver for DoorDash from time to time, and it’s made me change how I view tipping in these apps.

I’m not tipping for quality of service (it’s hard to be ‘good’ vs ‘great’ on pick up, drive, drop off as a service, and if the driver manages to do that badly, DoorDash will make it right for you and ding the driver). Instead I’m tipping based on quantity of work, e.g., the distance I’m asking the driver to cover or the size/weight of the order if it’s something like groceries. While this is something that DoorDash should be doing, it’s not and is left to the customer to close the gap voluntarily.

DoorDash likes to act like they’re just connecting customers to people that want to make a delivery, but they’ve set up the system to feel like DoorDash is the service provider rather than the drivers. In reality, drivers should be setting their fees as independent contractors and DoorDash should only be providing the interface.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I agree. Pre tipping is not a good idea.

I also tip in cash whenever I can. Less chance of middlemen stealing it and “server” can decide to declare it as income or not.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Never offer cash tips on delivery platforms. People occasionally claim in their delivery instructions that they will pay an additional cash tip; nobody actually does. Talk to any driver and they will tell you the same: cash tippers are non-tippers.

Drivers can’t even see your offer of a cash tip until after they have accepted the offer. If you don’t offer a tip at checkout, your cash-tip offer is completely indistinguishable from a no-tip offer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Tipping fatique… Wtf…

permalink
report
reply
8 points
*

Well, it’s a pretty ingenious way to get all the DoorDash drivers in Ny to quit I guess.

Was that their goal?

permalink
report
reply
15 points

I don’t get how this even benefits doordash. It wasn’t costing doordash anything to route the customer’s tip to the driver, was it? That money came directly from the customer, it didn’t come out of the fees doordash collects. So whether or not the customer tips is immaterial to DD’s bottom line, and this only hurts the drivers.

Why are they punishing the drivers for something the state did? Honestly vile.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points
*

Companies like Uber, Doordash, etc. think they’re more important than they actually are. They want their drivers to quit in a “Oh yeah, well if we have to pay our drivers a minimum wage now then we don’t want to do business here,” sense. As if delivery services actually help local economies and don’t strangle small businesses and exploit vulnerable job-seeking people. Good riddance, I’d love to see more cities run these companies into the ground.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I’d imagine that the people who choose to work those jobs would rather prefer to make that choice themselves instead of random people telling them that they’re being exploited actually and so now they’re jobless, but maybe they don’t actually know what’s best for themselves.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Frankly the model of ordering directly from a restaurant who had their own delivery drivers was better.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

This was my take. A business bro is having an entitlement tantrum and is taking it out on the only people that they can get away with hurting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Unless they weren’t averaging $17.96/hr before this happened, in which case they might stick around

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

They weren’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Their “goal” was to get drivers to stop delivering in NYC so then drivers would complain and put pressure on politicians to reverse the min wage rule. They believe they’re offering an essential service and it’s disruption will make people rise up to their defense. What’s really going to happen is that people won’t give a shit and just move on to the next thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

How is that a protest? That’s actually a good thing.

permalink
report
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 22K

    Posts

  • 556K

    Comments