4 points

I’ll just leave this here: French Revolution https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_Revolution

permalink
report
reply
8 points

We have to stop this :(

permalink
report
reply
15 points

Billionaires is a symptom of the illness.

permalink
report
reply
-17 points

And the poor are the cause.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Meanwhile the republicans want to remove the estate tax

permalink
report
reply
130 points

Probably a controversial opinion but companies should not be able to own residential real estate at all, the reason most people cant get a house is because big companies are buying them up with limitless sums of money so they can rent them out infinitely, its not a free market when the big company will pay 20% over your entire life savings just to make sure you don’t own anything.

permalink
report
reply
23 points

Not just limitless sums, companies are borrowing at very low interest rates and skyrocketing real estate prices with free money. Consequelty also causing mass inflation. So you’re paying for them owning houses.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Not controversial at all. The world would be a better place if residential real estate “investment” didn’t exist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I agree in the case of single-family homes. Even in cases of 3 or 4 unit buildings. But how do you propose full-on complexes get run if not by a company? Very few individuals have the capital to buy a 50-unit building, and honestly, the US needs more dense urban housing to help reduce our impact on climate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Cooperative-like legal structures and public housing are viable options.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Condos. (for non-Americans, this means “apartments except owner-occupied, or at least individually owned and then rented out”

I lived in a 200+ unit condo building. Owned my unit and some proportion of the common stuff and had voting rights and such in the HOA.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Easy. Non-profit co-ops, ideally as part of land trusts. They keep prices reasonable, give all community members a say, and the people who are lucky enough to live in them love them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

My opinion that would be just like asking who would own the streets you use to get to it.

We don’t wonder how that really expensive bridge gets owned… Sometimes it’s due to tolls but not always.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

%100 no brainer

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Yeah no this isn’t controversial. Private landlords serve no purpose in society. You just pay them their mortgage for the privilege of living in their house. It’s ridiculous.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Absolutely nothing controversial about the truth. In fact, I’d say it’s the exact opposite of controversial, at least in this case.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Controversial would be, “if the government won’t stop corporations from buying up single family homes, we should do it ourselves by any means necessary.” That’s controversial.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Controversial but true.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 21K

    Posts

  • 524K

    Comments