cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/1874605

A 17-year-old from Nebraska and her mother are facing criminal charges including performing an illegal abortion and concealing a dead body after police obtained the pair’s private chat history from Facebook, court documents published by Motherboard show.

110 points

We need to be clear here. Don’t hate Meta/Facebook for complying with a legal search warrant. That’s the law. Hate Meta/Facebook for having the ability to hand over private chat messages at all. End-to-End Encryption is the only answer. It’s not about trust, it’s about the ability.

permalink
report
reply
36 points

End-to-End Encryption is the only answer.

With OpenSource, audited, and user-controlled software.

Any software that could be ordered by a third party (like Meta) to send the E2E keys to the server, while sending all the encrypted messaged through the same server, is not to be trusted.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

This would be bigger news had they broken WA E2EE. Indeed, the officials might prefer not to disclose the capability if they had it and this wouldn’t have happened. (Except, maybe, via parallel construction.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

That’s the law.

Yeah, I don’t buy that, not when you have the obscene money and power that Meta has. They could have fought it and resisted, but they didn’t. This is the same company that literally just stole a trademark and absolutely nothing meaningful happened to them because of it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

You don’t buy that it’s the law?

not when you have the obscene money and power that Meta has. They could have fought it and resisted,

What you’re saying is because Meta is rich, they don’t have to obey the law?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

What you’re saying is because Meta is rich, they don’t have to obey the law?

Anyone who’s rich in America doesn’t have to obey the law. That’s not a matter of opinion. There’s a clear and observable imbalance between the rich and poor in regard to the outcomes experienced in the American justice system.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

They could have said okay here you g… oooops jeez it’s gone. Wow how did that happen. Oh well.

They’re a branch of the government at this point. Call it investing in avoiding the kind of scrutiny they should have been under the moment they started psychological experiments on the public.

They admitted to it but I don’t see Zuck the fuck in jail do you?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’m sure there were plenty of strategies, but we all know that the justice system for a mega-corporation in America is way, way different than the justice system for a poor or middle class individual, so it’s laughable to me that anyone would look at this scenario, shrug, and pretend that Meta didn’t have any recourse in order to do the right thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Facebook supports E2E encrypted chats but you have to enable it, similar to Telegram. Whatsapp uses E2EE by default.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Hate american legislative / politics instead? Don’t hate the player, hate the game?

You’re right. e2ee is a good thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
56 points

I get very frustrated with the people who side with the govt here because it was a 7 month foetus. Just because it is 7 months rather than 5 or 6 doesn’t suddenly mean the government should be able to coerce the use of someone’s body as an incubator against their will.

Feels like people just don’t give a shit about bodily autonomy and such :/ nya

permalink
report
reply
11 points

I think the argument is that at 7 months that’s a viable human and it has rights on its own.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

It doesn’t have rights until it slides out of the vagina or cesarean section. Until that moment it’s none of anyone’s business but the mother.

And it’s not the government or Facebook or any fucking one else’s place to criminalize this, or to presume to have a right to have any say in the matter.

I’m a male white democrat but I don’t even lean as far left as many fellow liberals. I’m close to left center. Nevertheless, it astounds me how many people put a line where the baby “could” potentially survive. So what? It’s still in the mother’s body it’s still part of her body. And it’s nobody else’s right to have any say about it whatsoever - except arguably a minor vote to the father, a little bit. But ultimately this whole criminalization is not about life at all, but about politics and economics.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

That’s a separate discussion on its own as for some 1 second old human is one with their own rights. But then in Belarus there is a lot of things that are illegal and we consider normal, like saying your leader is corrupt. Should META comply just because it is local law?

At the end of the day it seems we just can not trust anything that isn’t encrypted.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Jumping in here to say that I don’t feel like the Technology community is the right place to have the debate on the gestational limits for abortion. Let’s keep the focus on technology please.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

If someone attached themselves to your body transfusion-like, and used your organs, do you think they have the right to do that against your will if they would die by being detached from your body? I.E do you think the state should have the right to lock you in a cell to prevent you from detaching your transfusion tube from that person?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Generally the logic is that once the fetus has reached viability (i.e. capable of being removed and continuing life without the mother), then acts that result in death of the fetus are no longer necessary nor morally valid. It is reasonable to expect the fetus to be removed from the mother and provided life support at that stage.

permalink
report
parent
reply
54 points

The elimination of Roe has brought many states back to the stone ages…

For all we know these girl could have been raped by a family member, or other bad actor and the mother was just helping the only way she knew how.

I am sure this was extremely scarring and emotional for the mother and daughter, and now the state wants to charge them for murder…

permalink
report
reply
12 points

The baby was aborted at 7 months- it was very close to being a fully formed babby, a far cry from aborting in the first couple months.

Afaik abortion at that stage was already illegal in many areas.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Funny how everyone in this thread knows exactly how healthy that foetus was.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

formed babby

it was on the news this mroing

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

A mother in ar who have kill her too kid.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Ah shit my bad I did not realize that from the article! I take part of it back hahah.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Yeah a little bit intense in this case

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The state this happened in didn’t change their abortion policy when roe v wade was appealed though.

I’m pro abortion, but not at 28 weeks. A baby can survive at 28 weeks. Not only did they cause an abortion, they then illegally disposed of a dead body.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I’m for abortion in emergencies, such as any time an expectant mother feels like it’s necessary. Women are not mindless incubators and shouldn’t be treated like them under the law.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

No one is saying they’re “mindless incubators”, but “I want to fit in my jeans again” isn’t an “emergency” and doesn’t give them the right to take drugs to abort a baby that could survive out in the world at its age.

Just so we’re on the same page here - you feel that a woman should be able to abort a 39 week old baby?

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points

Fuck Meta

permalink
report
reply
1 point

This quote should be higher. Everyone defending Meta, Elon, or Google obviously has a financial interest in doing so. These companies and individuals are sub human trash

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
5 points

I knew it sounded familiar. I remember this.

Honestly though, if anything things have only gotten worse not better.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

If only people could be united to sacrifice one giant company make an example of them. But you couldn’t get ten Americans to fart in synchronicity unless you were paying them and their streaming services were offline. “Revolutionary changes for the better to our economy? Nah, I’m good.”

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@beehaw.org

Create post

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Community stats

  • 2.7K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.9K

    Posts

  • 53K

    Comments