33 points
*

Just when I think conservatives can’t get any dumber they always find a way. It’s remarkable, really.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

A couple months ago, my conservative neighbor mentioned he thought Taylor Swift was dating Travis Kelce as some plot to force people to get vaccinated. At the time, I thought this was just a dumb ass theory that he came up with himself after seeing Travis Kelce on a COVID vaccine commercial, so I just laughed it off. Now I see this is an actual message being pushed by the right wing. Jesus these people are fucking nut jobs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Republicans are attacking Swift/Swifties? I need to buy more popcorn!

permalink
report
reply
14 points
*

Republicans are attacking Swift/Swifties? I need to buy more popcorn!

A woman, who has only been able to vote for about a century, actively encouraging others to vote??! Blasphemy!

I wonder if they’ll burn as many of the expensive NFL jerseys they paid for as they did when a black man had the gall to send a silent message about police brutality and inequality.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s like they’re swift-boating her.

The term swiftboating (also swift-boating or swift boating) is a pejorative American neologism used to describe an unfair or untrue political attack. The term is derived from the name of the organization “Swift Boat Veterans for Truth” (SBVT, later the Swift Vets and POWs for Truth) because of their widely publicized—and later discredited—political smear campaign[1][2][3][4][5] against 2004 U.S. presidential candidate John Kerry.[6][1][7][8] Since the 2004 election, the term has come to commonly refer to a political attack that is dishonest, personal, and unfair.[9][10]

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Brilliant

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I didn’t see that one coming. Applause

permalink
report
parent
reply
-26 points
*

While I don’t think it is some sort of stupid political conspiracy, I do think that she is being advertised/shilled a crazy amount.

It feels like it blew up in less than a year. She’s fucking everywhere now.

Edit: to the fans (or Swifties or whatever you want to be called), I’m in no way talking shit about her. I’m simply pointing out that she’s in the news a lot. Stop PM’ing me bullshit. I also don’t care about your downvotes.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Thank fuck I’m not in the US. After being outside for so long, I think the advertisement-atmosphere would send me to suicide.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Very easy to ignore all the ads. I turn the out completely.

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

She’s been a top-selling artist with a huge fan base for years now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Oh I’m not saying she isn’t. I know she’s been around a while. But you don’t see any other artist with the amount of publicity she’s getting is my point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

She re-did and re-released a couple albums this year, had a massive worldwide tour, which she had filmed. The movie made $100,000,000 on opening weekend and is the highest-grossing concert film ever. She’s doing an awful lot of stuff this year, so of course she’s getting a lot of coverage.

She also managed to completely sidestep the entire multiple Hollywood strikes issue by the simple expedient of meeting with the unions, asking them what they wanted, and saying, “Okay, you got it.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Yep. I’m not a fan of the billionaire class in general since I don’t think anyone should be allowed to be that rich, but she actually seems to do right by her workers, which is a hell of a lot more than you can say for most of them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Most Billionaires don’t earn their wealth. Taylor Swift has earned her wealth.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-17 points

Definitely. She’s a capitalist’s dream. See creates scarcity with her albums and merch, forcing frenzied buying and price scalping. She’s a prolific polluter and her dad bought her success.

Now any criticism of her actions and business practices are met with her fans calling you a conservative or a misogynist because capitalism has melted their brains.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Every thread

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

In particular, her tour was a massive three hour retrospective covering her entire career rather than being focused on one new album. Combine that with a few re-recordings of old albums and her successfully getting a new generation of Gen Z fans and you’ve got one very popular star.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yo harddaysknoght, I’m really happy for you, Imma let you finish but Taylor Swift has been in the industry a long time… A long time!

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I know that. I’m saying the coverage she’s getting is nowhere near any other artist

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

Swift is a force of good, as much as any insanely rich person can be. She alone may end up responsible for tens of thousands of young women registering to vote between now and election day. One of her Instagram posts drove 35,000 voter registrations. Republicans have every reason to fear the Swiftie factor.

permalink
report
reply
28 points

Yeah. She’s measured with it too. One of the reasons her sway is so strong imo, is she just saved it up for a long time. So when she finally asks a fan “hey could you do this one little thing for me?” it almost feels like “uh, yeah, I’ve known you my whole life Taylor, of course.”

Which the fan doesn’t “know her” per se, but between a musician and a huge fan, it definitely feels like you do. It’s a personal relationship, a little different from most other fandoms. Music is just odd that way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

I would say that Princess Diana would be a comparison.

Personally, I like Swift because she has legs for days. I’ll vote for that reason alone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I would also do anything those legs asked of me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
77 points

Lazy projection. The Trump campaign was already literally part of Russian PsyOps a decade ago.

permalink
report
reply
19 points

Exactly.

C’mon now, we all know the primary thrust of their attacks/defenses is always “I know you are, but what am I?”. By far the most common. It’s used like half the time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Isn’t it more "I know I am, but what are you?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

No. If you call one corrupt or a liar for instance, they will not say anything like “I know I am.”

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 464K

    Comments