The witness was allegedly suffering from advanced glaucoma at the time of the crime, severely limiting visibility. Surveillance video from the scene also revealed the eyewitness was much farther away than he initially claimed to be, according to the Exoneration Project.

A Chicago man who spent more than a decade in prison after he was found guilty of murder primarily based on the testimony of a “blind eyewitness” will get a new trial, his attorney said.

Darien Harris, 30, was convicted following a 2011 shooting that left 23-year-old Rondell Moore dead and another seriously injured, the Chicago Tribune reported. Harris, who is Black, was 18 at the time and has always maintained his innocence.

On Tuesday, a Cook County judge vacated Harris’ conviction, the Exoneration Project said. Judge Diana Kenworthy said it was best to “start over,” according to the newspaper.

59 points

Because of the seriousness of the crime, the judge said, Harris will not be released as he waits for a new trial, according to the Chicago Sun-Times. A new trial date has not been set.

This is a load of shit. A blind witness AND cop intimidation should automatically lead to being freed from jail until a new trial begins.

Justice my ass. Pfft.

ACAB

permalink
report
reply
20 points
*

AT THE VERY LEAST released to home arrest

Man has effectively been on pretrial confinement for 12 years

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

He’s staying in jail, it doesn’t really matter what if anything he did.

—the US justice system having a normal one

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Lawsuit incoming.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That is absolute bullshit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Be quiet, the adults are talking.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Wow imagine a kid stole your girlfriend, sorry 😔

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

That account is 4 hrs old. smdh

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

For anyone who’s isn’t aware eye witness testimony is routinely wrong. It is far from a fool proof form of evidence.

permalink
report
reply
15 points

when I was taking a law class in person our professor had arranged for a friend of his to walk into the classroom, shout “BANG” and then leave. After that happened, we finished the rest of the 3 hour night class, and at the end of the class asked us all to write down a description of that person and hand it in. Next week, he had compiled all the descriptions into a tag cloud of characteristics that we as eye witnesses had “testified” to. We couldn’t even agree on this person’s presented race and gender. We literally had people saying it was a black man and people saying it was a white woman. Eyewitness testimony isn’t just far from foolproof, it should probably be ignored in most cases.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I bet the witness did not see that coming

permalink
report
reply
11 points
*

That sounds like something straight from The Onion.

permalink
report
reply
-2 points

All the other key witnesses are dead other than the shop clerk and mechanic. Chicago gangland is wild

permalink
report
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 511K

    Comments