Senator Warren calls out Apple for shutting down Beeper’s ‘iMessage to Android’ solution::U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) is throwing her weight behind Beeper, the app that allowed Android users to message iPhone users via iMessage,

11 points

If this sparks an interoperability discussion (and actions) in the USA, it’ll be ironic for Apple who might escape interoperability in the EU.

permalink
report
reply
18 points

Honestly it’s hard to see how messages don’t fall under the protection of net neutrality.

permalink
report
reply
29 points

I mean they do, but that doesn’t mean a message platform can’t platform lock itself.

The ISP isn’t discriminating… that’s net neutrality.

I think you might be a bit confused.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

It just feels like users being restricted to not having any incoming or outgoing communication across operating systems is discriminating. The reason Beeper’s previous and current solutions stopped working is because they started blocking it. If Apple had successfully built a protocol that couldn’t be accessed by Android devices then that would be one thing, but they failed to do that and now they’re discriminating against otherwise valid connections.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

It just feels like users being restricted to not having any incoming or outgoing communication across operating systems is discriminating.

That’s not remotely what’s happening though? I have only ever had android devices, but message people on apple devices all the time. I don’t know or care what colour my sms messages show up on their devices, but they do show up. And maybe they have a bunch of iOS-only secret chat orgies they don’t tell me about, but who cares? I can still talk to them across discord, line, WhatsApp, Instagram, fb messenger, slack, Skype, signal, telegram, irc and God knows how many other different chat apps my friends and I have used at various times. The fact that iMessage is Apple exclusive doesn’t make a difference to anything, they all have a different subset of apps anyway even just the android users so i have to have all those apps installed too, and my iPhone friends have the same.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s a competitive advantage. Nothing wrong with that from a business perspective.

Why should Apple build something to work with Android? That would allow people in Apple’s hand to swap. No business reason to do it. Why waste server time servicing a competing platform’s user’s messages?

Then again, there isn’t really a reason why iMessage is a big benefit with RCS, Whatsapp, Messenger, SMS, Signal, etc. exist.

According to the given logic, logic if I reverse engineer Facebook Messenger, I should be able to have my app that talks to FB Messenger users. I would have it until, they block me out. They have a terms of service that likely disallows this usage. They have a right to enforce that.

At the end of the day I could care less about iMessage but can defend Apple’s right to be a walled garden if they want, even if I disagree, etc.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Net neutrality effectively ending under Trump might clear it up

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Ah, you’re right, the reimplementation of some of the old rules was voted to pass in October 2023 so it’s probably still in the works. Damn.

Wow, think about that for a moment. ISPs could be controlling everything we see and don’t see right at this moment. Kind of fucked.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

They’re still regulated under Title 1, just not as much. Theres much less of an obligation to set a fair price, for example. More so pointing out we can’t necessarily rely on net neutrality as something that generally protects anyone from anything anymore. It only prevents business from doing specific things that are seen as bad business, the consumer isn’t really in mind

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points
*

What’s the point of asking questions when this community just downvotes? Why even have a forum if it’s only use is to.upvote things that agree with your pre established opinions?

permalink
report
reply
-7 points

Oh no! You got downvoty wotied!

Now what? We gonna stop posting just because of a little red number? That’s stupid.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Cringe

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Watch this I’m gonna make my own comment go from 3 downvotes to 4

Guess what? It doesn’t matter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Your primary contribution to this conversation is to bitch about how no one engages with you? I see users responding to you but then all you are responding back with is editing your comment to say “thanks for answering”? Idk man… maybe it’s your approach to dialogue. Being super dismissive and retaliatory tends to bring downvotes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

I had asked the same question and was downvoted to -10 before I deleted it and reposted it. It’s an issue I’ve been seeing in this community growing for a while now, so yeah I’m gonna bitch when this place starts turning into reddit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

It’s an issue I’ve been seeing in this community growing on the internet for a while now, so yeah I’m gonna bitch when this place starts turning into reddit the internet.

There, fixed.

It’s the internet, grow some thicker skin, or figure out how to interface with your fellow netizens differently.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Oh I see. Didn’t realize you’d already deleted it. Anyway, best of luck; I think you bring up valid complaints but idk why the vitriol. This crowd is much less annoying than what’s found in some similar forums. Don’t let the downvotes bother you too much.

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I’m having a brain fart, what movie is this from again? I remember the scene but can’t remember the movie

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

I, Robot

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Why should our government care about this? I’ve been on android for over a decade now, I have 0 interest in this imessage bullshit and I don’t understand why our government representatives care

What benefits are there to expanding this system? Why should they waste resources spending time on this?

Also this community would rather just downvote than actually have a discussion. Engage with me instead of downvoting me this time, stop downvoting things you disagree with, this isn’t reddit. I’m contributing to the conversation and you have an opportunity to explain the reasons behind this

Edit: thank you to all the people who took the time to answer my question

permalink
report
reply
7 points

It’s not a messaging thing it’s an anti-trust thing. And for all the times I agree with Warren, I think she’s wrong here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

Messaging interoperability between the two major mobile platforms greatly affects communication for those of us who have friends and family on the other platform. Cross-platform messaging allows us to communicate no matter which platform the friend or family member happened to buy. Blocking this feature is anti-competitive and detrimental to communication.

The entire purpose of government is to help make society better for all of its members. Some government representatives may decide that ‘better for society’ would be to allow the corporation to maximize profit even if it harms the consumer. This particular politician believes that society would benefit from this interoperability and that the company may be overstepping anti-competitive monopoly boundaries by blocking it.

Whether you agree with the idea or not, and whether it affects you personally or not is immaterial. It affects society at large and the government is supposed to represent members of its society.

It’s nice that you either don’t use SMS or all of your family/friends are on Android, or you simply don’t have family/friends, but for the rest of us, we would like to send pictures to our grandma without her complaining that it’s pixelated and tiny because she has an iPhone. It has been frustrating for years, but now that a solution has been realized, it seems anti-competitive that one of the vendors is now trying to block the fix. Regardless, even if this fix remains blocked, we do have hope that iOS will get RCS in the near future.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Signal is great. E2ee multiplatform messaging. Everybody’s happy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

I love third party messaging apps. It’s quite a bit more difficult to get every single extended family member on board. 2nd cousin I see at a family reunion every year or two? “Hit me up some time! Just install this app on your phone first and sign up for an account!”

I’ll get on board with this one if all phone manufacturers start installing signal as their default messaging app.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Instead they should force any phone manufacturer to integrate matrix in the SMS app, that would really benefit the user most…

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

To make the phone and messaging market more competitive. It may not affect you but it does affect most android users.

Also maybe she has an android, idk

permalink
report
parent
reply
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 12K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 577K

    Comments