103 points

I’m not falling for this again. This is the same type of articles we saw back in 2016. Get out and vote like your country depends on it.

permalink
report
reply
-2 points

It literally does. What did people “fall for”?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

What did people “fall for”?

Pretty sure they’re referring to how a lot of people didn’t believe he could win in 2016. I don’t know to what extent that actually affected voting, but even the pollsters (the supposed experts at election prediction) predicted he had no chance at winning.

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points

Ugh, that’s what I said in 2015 when he descended a golden escalator to announce his candidacy. I have since lost any remaining faith in US politics. Everyone has become more insane since then and there has been absolutely no signs of rational discussion reentering the political forum.

permalink
report
reply
-7 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Obviously I wasn’t referring to you when I said everyone has become more insane

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points

“His threats to democracy make him dangerous. They also make him a weak candidate.”

His threats to democracy are exactly what draws his supporters. They are inherently anti-democratic. We saw this on 1/6 and we saw it in all the challenges in the various swing states.

It’s actively what they want.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

He’s good at catering to his base but he’s driving away everyone that isn’t a Christofascist. Democrats have outperformed polling the last 2 cycles, and I suspect it’s due to this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

I remember everyone saying “don’t worry, he won’t win” the first time.

Forgive my if I maintain a pessimistic view this time around.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

If Democrats take this seriously, they might have to vary their messaging or worse – do something that might appeal to the despised left of the party.

If they just take victory as a foregone conclusion, they don’t have to do shit. They can always blame the left of the party for any losses and use that as an excuse to move even farther to the right.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

He didn’t win the first time either.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

That’s as stupid a statement as claims he didn’t lose in 2020.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

I fucking hope so!

permalink
report
reply
9 points

You and me both, and I don’t even live anywhere near to the U.S.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

It doesn’t matter where you live.

Fascists gaining control of the United States military would be the end of us all.

Especially Fascists led by an idiot who pondered using a nuke to stop a hurricane.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 385K

    Comments