Currently I’m using Joplin with Syncthing-backed file system synchronization. I’m pretty pleased with it, as I do like tagging- and Markdown-based systems.

I plan to upgrade to server-based synchronization, but before doing that, however, I wanted to see what other people are using.

Edit: So far I see a slight favor towards Joplin and Logseq, but I totally didn’t expect (and appreciate) getting so many different answers.

55 points

Logseq, it’s a lot like Obsidian as it also has knowledge graphs, tags, is markdown-based and self-hostable but, in contrast to Obsidian, it’s fully open source

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Much prefer Logseq as well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Checking out Logseq now. I switched to Obsidian a few months ago and have been really liking it. Was time to switch it up from org-mode after YEARS of using it

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Logseq user here too.

However, for a quick, transitory note, I use Kate or, more recently, Xpad. Only then I transcribe the content to Logseq. Why?

Because while Logseq is great as an outliner and for network thinking, it’s as graceful and agile as an elephant.

The gist of what I’m saying is: for now, and for me (hardware might be playing a role here, but I don’t think so) Logseq is a good note database. For quick typing, I have to use something else.

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

Unsaved n++ tabs

permalink
report
reply
19 points

There’s dozens of us

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Tabs right?

New33

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

This is the way

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I do that for some random notes, but I prefer app like Obsidian for managing notes/todo lists for some stuff like projects, etc.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It automatically restoring all those unsaved notes has made me so lazy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

Obsidian is where I landed after trying several.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

Just tried it for a bit. Looks pretty sleek and has some nice features, but it seems like it’s not open-source, which is something I’d like to avoid.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Then Logseq. It’s an outliner (each line can be it’s own…thing…), but it’s open source and a direct competitor of Obsidian. In fact, I was ambivalent between the two when I first started with online note-taking.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Does it store files in plain text?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That looks very interesting, mostly because it’s so different. I’ll have to take a closer look later.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I am not trying to defend Obsidian here in regards to its closed source but in the least the notes are not obscured in some database and use markdown format. So once they go away from that, I am out and still have all my notes accessible.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points
*

Joplin. Obsidian is not open source, doesn’t have native self hosting and it gets complicated. Joplin is very simple and just works. Although, it stores the notes in a hashed database, so you can’t edit raw files without Joplin client

permalink
report
reply
15 points

Good call on Obsidian not being FOSS! I don’t know that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Trilium for the same reasons, but the featureset of Trilium is more like Obsidian.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Trillium was originally created to be an open source replacement for Roam Research. Trilium came out in 2017, and had Roam-like features before Roam even existed. It’s similarities to Obsidian are purely coincidental, probably because Obsidian is designed to be a cross between Roam and Evernote.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Please, I don’t want to be rude, so don’t take me wrong.

I think that’s not accurate. Trillium is not even an outliner, let alone a block note taking app. I think you’re mixing trillium with Logseq.

My memory may be failing me, but I think trillium has been around longer than Roam Research.

And yes, it’s a great open source note taking app!

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Problem with Joplin: The raw files are randomly named so you can’t easily find a specific note

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

That’s not even the bigger problem. I found the desktop ui very clunky. There were too many papercuts for me to keep using joplin. However, its TUI and mobile app are excellent.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Obsidian. I know it’s not open source, but it just felt right.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Yep, same. Though if Acreom ever goes local only on mobile OR when Notesnook opens up self hosting, I will take another look.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Just fyi notesnook is not really “zero knowledge”. They’re misusing that term.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I didn’t make that claim though. Regardless, that wouldn’t matter in a self-host situation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Yep just swapped over from a self hosted solution with gitlab and sublime… But that was to restrictive and the overall experience wasnt really good…

I then found a post somewhere on lemmy a post abotu PKMS and what people are using… One was obsidian… So I tried it and I’m really happy

Edit: I saw some comments about some missing self hosting. Since the notes are saved as standard md files you easily ca sync them with whatever you want… I set it up with my synology NAS and DS Drive, but any tool which can sync two-ways should be fine

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Not being open source is the great… sin for me. Note taking is an investment in the future, and betting on a closed source platform is a big no no—for me, that is.

I know the content is safe in Obsidian, since it’s just Markdown files. But the workflow? Not so much.

And I know the developers behind Obsidian have their reasons to close source it. Nothing against that. But since that’s their way, it’s not my way.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Selfhosted

!selfhosted@lemmy.world

Create post

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don’t control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we’re here to support and learn from one another. Insults won’t be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it’s not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don’t duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

Community stats

  • 4.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.5K

    Posts

  • 75K

    Comments