If you’re thinking of sending back a disappointing gift you just received over the holidays, the return may bring even more disappointment.

Americans have grown accustomed to free returns, but a growing number of retailers are charging fees as returns squeeze retailers’ bottom lines.

Macy’s, Abercrombie, J. Crew, H&M and other companies have all added shipping fees for mail-in returns.

And it’s not just the big mall brands, either. Eighty-one precent of merchants are now charging a fee for at least some methods of returns, according to Happy Returns, a logistics company that specializes in returns.

127 points

You want to give people as reason to go back to brick and mortar shopping? Because this is how you get people to go back to brick and mortar shopping.

permalink
report
reply
116 points

The main issue is amazon and their insistence on allowing China to sell utter trash, knock offs, counterfeits, and lies.

Amazon used to require someone selling in the US to have a physical presence of at least like a small office building in the US in order to sell goods here. They got rid of that like 10 years ago and now you get bs brands like Liuxipon selling flashlights that are garbage with 300 fake 5 star reviews. Then if they get flagged enough or get enough real 1 star reviews, no problem. Now their company name is Lioxipan and they do it again.

Amazon turned itself into a trash heap.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

We started shopping AliExpress instead of Amazon. At least you don’t pay the high Amazon prices and are pleasantly surprised when something of decent quality arrives. Got the kids some flying spacemen drones. $1.99 each. They’ve been playing with them all day long. No complaints. AliExpress even refunded me on a few things that arrived broken, without having to return anything.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

That’s exactly what I do because amazon basically sells the same stuff as aliexpress, only amazon insists on selling stuff in higher quantities to jack up prices.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Cheap until they get popular enough.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

As if they wouldn’t just charge a “restocking fee.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

I worked retail for 15 years, and the only time we charged a restocking fee was if we couldn’t sell it as new, and there was nothing wrong with it. If you returned it brand new, full refund. If you opened it and/or used it and decided to return it, 15% restocking fee. That seemed reasonable to me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

If you can see the item in real life and compare it to other products before you buy, you’re less likely to need to return it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

That is what they want. Offer free returns in store, and people will go to their physical locations and also buy something else.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

That’s what kohl’s does in taking Amazon returns. They even give you a $5 store credit to sweeten the allure on your walk from the back of the store

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Not to mention the additional traffic it generates, good for the corporate machine at large

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

That real estate isn’t gonna pay for itself! Won’t you think of the shareholders?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

No… I’m just going to use an online retailer who will do it free

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Hopefully that’s exactly what happens. It would be less convenient for me, but it would be better overall.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Best Buy Brick and Mortar charges 15% restocking fee. Merry NOTmas!

permalink
report
parent
reply
61 points

Ok, but Amazon is 100% fake Chinese crap now, so don’t expect people to jump into buying that anymore without some idea that it can be sent back. Real brands don’t even sell on Amazon anymore.

permalink
report
reply
13 points
*

What Amazon is that? That seems crazy.

I can find all my real brand of what I need in there, but I am not from America tbh.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

I have the same experience unfortunately in Europe. Was looking for a new hairdryer the other day, and it’s just endless pages of the same Chinese crap with made up brand names and fake customer reviews.

Gave up and drove to the store instead.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That there are cheap x Chinese stuff in there yeah. But if you know the brands that doesn’t matter. Plus you an also always check the seller data is usually some weird Chinese name and address.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

You can order from a good brand, but that doesn’t stop the counterfeiters from putting on a fake label.

Amazon does single-bin sorting of products sold by multiple sellers. So all of widget X get put in one bin and shipped regardless of the source. That encourages fake/counterfeit products because it’s impossible to trace which of the hundred companies selling the product is actually supplying the fakes.

I watched a video somewhere on 18650 batteries, and the takeaway was that most of the batteries provided from Amazon (regardless of branding) are fake.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I worked at an Amazon warehouse for a bit and I can tell you literally everything is tracked, they have to know and just don’t care as long as people aren’t making enough of a fuss about it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Well so far if I got any fake was a good one or good enough for me. 😅

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

it gets pretty bad when you’re looking for something specific like cable crimps. louis rossmann dod a video on that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It’s BS. More often than not if Amazon doesn’t directly sell ‘x’ brand, there is some reseller selling the real brand item on Amazon, but it’s also surrounded by knockoff garbage in the listings.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Wrangler still does. Only clothing I buy from Amazon is that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points

Gonna have a slight chilling effect on sales. People won’t buy stuff unless they’re 100% sure.

permalink
report
reply
17 points
*

Or at least people will return to bricks and mortar stores for purchases of the types of items that get returned most often.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I am not doing that. Going to get into my car and drive all the way to the outskirts of my city to some box store just to find the item I want isn’t even there? No way not happening.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

As they should.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Shipping fees for returns isn’t too bad, but if it looks like a retailer isn’t standing behind the products they sell them they shouldn’t be surprised when shoppers shop elsewhere.

permalink
report
reply
21 points
*

The issue is that it’s become too easy to buy a garment in 5 sizes and just return the ones that don’t fit. Many of those returned garments don’t get restocked, but instead end up selling downmarket where they can often end up in landfill. It wastes fuel, the retailer’s money, and harms the environment.

I think there should be some consequence for return. Even just a few dollars. Maybe find a better way to size things accurately so people don’t have to be so cautious.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

If clothing manufacturers made clothes anywhere near standard sizes people wouldn’t need to get 5 different sizes to figure out what the hell a Large is supposed to be.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

In general I avoid buying clothes online. And I will avoid it much more if returns are difficult.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

I mean sure, but everyone’s bodies are different. What drives me nuts is quality control. You can pick up 10 pairs of Levi’s that are 34x30 and each one will be different by probably over an inch. I have resorted to taking several identical pairs to the dressing room and keeping the one that fit the best.

Then everyone’s bodies are different. Some clothes will be cut differently and then fit differently. Basically, clothes shopping if you can’t get a few sizes online (or a few of the same sizes…) sucks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

No. I won’t buy clothing that doesn’t have a no argument return policy. Way too many times in my life the clothing died after only wearing once. You go shop at your store that likes “consequences”. I am going to laugh so hard when I see the handwritten note on the door that ends up on the internet

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

How often are returns defective vs just didn’t want/didn’t fit? If the item is defective you can’t restock it. If the item isn’t defective that’s where more cost might come in to get the item back in circulation to be sold.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

We’re talking about clothes here. I have never been able to find any clothing items that were consistently and accurately sized. Often even across the same brands, sizing is consistently inconsistent. If I can’t return for the proper size once I get an example of a product’s fit and sizing without paying for it, then the convenience of online shopping has evaporated and I might as well just go into a store and try things on. As if they don’t already charge enough of a markup to cover restocking.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points
*

Part of me wants to be upset, but especially since these are clothing manufacturers, I have to wonder if the people handling the returns have the same problems that I did when I used to process them.

It was my first job out of highschool (through a temp agency), it was my first day, and I did some returns. You know, writing down what the products were, why they were returned, the order numbers yadda yadda.

Everything was cool until I got this package with a LOT of sharp pins in it saying “you obviously need needles to sew the clothes properly”. There was only ONE thread loose, and this lady felt that making a complete stranger find sharp needles hidden in fabric was ok. Part of me hopes that that person finds the same kindness in life that they seem ok to give to strangers. Part of me wishes that it wasn’t such a common thing.

Some returns had legitimate rotting garbage in them, and a lot of them were only worn once and then were returned because they “only needed it for party, need money back now”. You can only see so much ridiculousness before you have enough, you know?

As a former employee, the fact that that company essentially paid for those needles and for the rotting garbage to be sent for other people to deal with was enough to make me quit. It’s not worth my health, full stop. It never will be. That incident also made me lose a lot of faith in most of the general public. Part of me wishes that that particular person experiences the same level of “goodwill” that they give to others. I don’t like wishing ill on peopld, but I also don’t want to wish on good things for bad people. Most of us manage to submit returns without including a hazard, and it takes next to no effort at all. I don’t even have to think about whether or not to do that, personally. It’s a no-brainer.

As long as the in-person returns are still valid (within reason) and it’s stated very clearly that online returns will cost money before purchasing, I don’t really see the issue. Just put that information where they will read it (or hear it if it’s voiced) and it should be OK.

It will help save the people who still have to deal with these insane returns for minimum wage. Fuck the overhead profit, and fuck the people who take their rage out on random minimum wage employees. (Don’t do that literally ofc.)

Take it up with the people who might be able to actually do something to fix your problem, if you’re that angry about the product. I will absolutely think much less of you if you personally take out your business complaints on the minimum wage employees.

permalink
report
reply
15 points

Part of me wishes that that particular person experiences the same level of “goodwill” that they give to others. I don’t like wishing ill on people

Don’t guilt yourself for wishing ill on people. Those people deserve it, and you are not being a bad person by wishing ill on those who deserve it. Society tells us it’s bad to do that, but all that does is make us feel guilt and let bad people get away with it. Wish ill, and do it freely!

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

Mirror principal: what you put out comes back. Aka karma.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Except karma isn’t real, and wishing something isn’t putting anything out. It’s just a wish. So you’re totally safe doing it.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 509K

    Comments