258 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
68 points

Nah it’s not that it’s libertarianism failing it’s just that idiots version of it failing

What they’ll say when it fails or next time someone else tries to implement their ideals

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

then immediately turn around and mock communists for saying something similar.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-16 points
*

What % of countries failed via communist policies vs countries that failed via libertarian policies? The top countries are liberal capitalist democracies. Anyone still simping for communism in 2023 is 9/10 times a brainlet child loser who lives in the west, never having suffered in a communist shithole, and decided to hang all their failures in life on being a victim of their country’s cApiTaListiC liBerAlisM. EDIT: tankie coping clowns (lemmy is full of them) downvote yet have nothing of substance to say zzzzzz

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

But what will Lemmy communists say when you point out USSR and China?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

To be fair USSR after communism was leagues better than USSR before communism ever could have been. But it’s not exactly proving much pointing out that an extremely unequal authoritarian regime is worse than a more equal but still authoritarian regime.

I don’t think the comparison works anyway because this is a true example of exactly what most libertarians have wet dreams of, while with communism people try to use e.g. the USSR and PRC to discredit leftism as a whole (especially socialism) even though any leftist worth their salt would realize authoritarianism is bad and creates a dangerous hierarchy, which is why Marx and Engels specified their ideologies to be democratic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I measure a country’s success by the quantity of weapons they produce

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I don’t think China succeeded because of communism. They succeeded because Rich Industrialists in the west did not want to share their success with ordinary people and hence shifted all their work to China where the government ensured a steady supply of cheap labour. Of course, this only worked because the Chinese population was so poor that what were considered bad wages in the west was significantly more money than they would get back home.

Now this kind of outsourcing of labour is what lead to countries coming out of poverty: what made them poor in the first place? Rampant colonialism by EU nations. You can see this in Africa, South America, Asia.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

He just didn’t libertarian hard enough.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Nah it’s not that it’s libertarianism failing it’s just that idiots version of it failing

That’s what Communists always say, the only one they worship is Lenin cuz he didn’t have time to do anything anyway.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

He had time to build the gulags

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

True libertarianism has never been tried bro

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

It’s been a while since I even bothered arguing with libertarians, but wouldn’t they just point to Hong Kong and South Korea?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Hong Kong which currently lives under an authoritarian regime, or South Korea which is a somewhat participatory executive democracy birthed from the corpse of an authoritarian regime?

Neither is a hot spot of libertarianism. South Korea is peak neo-liberalism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Lol is this a joke? South Korea that’s essentially a US military colony at this point? Yeah, totally libertarian.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points
*

I’m not a libertarian, I’m a social democrat.

The last century has been a total and unmitigated disaster for Argentina. The two options Argentinians had in this election were:

  1. More of the same by the guy who oversaw inflation reaching 160% (100% chance of things getting worse)
  2. A total wild card (99.9% chance of things getting worse)

Unsurprisingly, they went for the latter. I don’t think anti-libertarians get to gloat in this context, given it’s the Argentinian establishment which has overseen one of the most remarkable examples of total state-collapse and economic failure in modern history.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

This makes a lot of sense if you pretend he didn’t say or promise anything during the campaign.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points

Anything to add beside a snide comment?

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

The calculation shouldn’t be “chance of things getting worse”, but “expected value of how much worse it’ll get”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I don’t actually know anything. But casually to me it looked like a choice between 160% chance of it getting worse and a 300% chance of getting worse. And it’s not very surprising at all in these circumstances many go for the latter for all sorts of reasons (and delusions). But I don’t actually know anything.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You should probably read at least a little about Argentina’s recent history before commenting then…

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
  1. More of the same by the guy who oversaw inflation reaching 160% (100% chance of things getting worse)
  2. A total wild card (99.9% chance of things getting much worse)

FTFY

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That’s bad math. Yes, if you put the same people in office. There’s nearly 100% chance that they will continue doing what they have been doing. Good or bad. But if you put a lunatic with a grudge against reality in office. Who is aligned, or would align himself with the people who caused the problem before. You have 150% chance that things will get worse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

You have 150% chance

This isn’t exactly the best math either.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Oof, yeah that’s not a good choice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Mate one dude was hearing voices and talks with his deceased dogs…how can you say “wild card” with a straight face?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Argentina could’ve just gone for a new currency again

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Wouldn’t solve anything.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

What’s the previous case study?

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

This is a good one: https://newrepublic.com/article/159662/libertarian-walks-into-bear-book-review-free-town-project

The book is called, “A Libertarian Walks into a Bear.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Look up Kansas Ave Oklahoma. It got so bad for them they had to cut school to 4 days per week and that was before the pandemic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Lol what policies? Everyone for themselves?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Who is John Galt? Looks like we’re about to find out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

It’s the key ideological problem with the book. Rand was right that people do not inherently owe anyone else the fruits of their labor, but wrong about who was holding the world on their shoulders. It wasn’t the handful of elite, but the masses without whom the elite would be living in caves and running from bears.

Who is John Galt? We the people are.

And yes, throughout history pretty much every authoritarian regime ultimately collapses or sends their country back decades in progress by not knowing that lesson.

Yet it never seems to actually be learned.

permalink
report
parent
reply

They’ll come out of the woods and start claiming he wasn’t a true libertarian.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

New York cut their libraries so who’s the real loser?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points
*

After a century of Peronism, the current state of Argentina isn’t a case study about libertarianism. Quite the opposite.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Actually everything that’s wrong with Argentina is because of British colonialism. You haven’t read enough Foucault, clearly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
115 points

From everything I’ve heard about the election in Argentina, it was the meeting of “Anything is better than this” and “it can always get worse.” The former won, and proved the latter correct.

permalink
report
reply
14 points

Argentina needs shock therapy to realize milei is a dumbass

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

That’s what I thought about the US and Trump, yet here we are…

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

We had the same in the UK with Brexit and Boris. We assumed that because everything is shit, backing people looking to do drastic changes that experts agreed was horrific was worth it. It wasn’t, and now people are even poorer…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Kirchner and croneys did soooooo much damage and noone spoke up except milei

Even if he is a moronic religious extremist, he’s still RIGHT about many things.

And the people just wanna get rid of NARCO DICTADORS OF THE LEFT KIND.

All in all, extremism isn’t good. It leads to dictators collaboration with drug lords and ruzzia/china

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

No, the current policies are just getting reality and practice closer together.

IRL their money was ALREADY devalued soooooo much, he didn’t do anything to change that, just adjusted it to reality.

Subsidies on imported oil is CRAZY for a bankrupt country. YOU GUYS HAVE NOT UNDERSTOOD WHAT IT’S LIKE TO HAVE DECADES OF 100% OR MORE INFLATION PER YEAR.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Perfect summary

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

Fuck around and find out. I’m so sorry for everyone who was duped by libertarians pretending they will do anything for regular people and not just the wealthy shareholders, everyone who was held back by economic sanctions in a war against ‘muh socialism’, and all those who saw the obvious coming but were dragged into it by the other rubes. This is going to suck. I hope the protests will work

permalink
report
reply
34 points

permalink
report
reply
1 point

At some point, I risk a coup.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

Oh joy. Skyrocketing rent combined with plummeting wages.

This isn’t going to destroy their economy at all…

permalink
report
reply
29 points
*

That’s a right wing populist figure for you.

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!world@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 272K

    Comments