11 points
*

i too am gay and can’t do maths

permalink
report
reply
5 points

TIL there’s such a thing as being too gay for math.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Too fabulous for calculus.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

10 Skittles < 3 elephrants.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

they never specified the order relation, so we can’t really know what they meant by smallest. for all we know, 10 could be the right answer

permalink
report
reply
17 points

Obviously he is correct because the smallest base that can represent 10 is base 2 and 10 in base 2 is equal to 2 in base 10. And the smallest base in which you can represent the number 3 is base 4 and 3 in base 10 in equal to 3 so 2 is the smaller number hence “10” is the smaller number. And from the drawing of the rainbow you can infer that he wants to use a diverse range of bases and not just the common base 10. Btw I am only talking about the natural bases (whole number positive).

permalink
report
reply
15 points
*

*circles the 1 in 1-10*

permalink
report
reply
2 points

This is something I would do in school unironically.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Not the 0 in the 10?

permalink
report
parent
reply

No, the -10.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I mean technically zero is not a number

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

0 ∈ ℝ

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

By some definitions, maybe. However, definitions that exclude it probably do so for a specific reason. It’s more a fluke of categorization than a real world distinction. Those distinctions might be critical to certain logic systems, but even most people who use that definition recognize reality.

Zero is a number in more cases than it isn’t. It is a symbol that represents a value. Just like infinity, it doesn’t matter if 0 doesn’t exist in physical reality. It’s still a useful value in most cases.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Who told you that nonsense?

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

listen here u little

permalink
report
parent
reply