17 points

I hope they find a way.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The Biden administration Wednesday announced a $250 million military assistance package for Ukraine.

The aid package — the final of 2023 — will include arms and equipment, including air defense munitions, anti-armor munitions, ammunition for high mobility artillery rocket systems, and more than 15 million rounds of small arms ammunition, a State Department spokesperson said to CBS News.

“Our assistance has been critical to supporting our Ukrainian partners as they defend their country and their freedom against Russia’s aggression,” Secretary of State Antony Blinken said in a statement, urging Congress to “swiftly” approve further aid to Ukraine.

Earlier this month, Senate Republicans blocked additional Ukraine funding over a dispute with Democrats over U.S. border security.

“The decisions we make now are going to determine the future for decades to come, particularly in Europe,” Mr. Biden said during his meeting with Zelenskyy.

Editor’s note: A previous version of this story incorrectly stated that the $250 million in military aid to Ukraine needs congressional approval.


The original article contains 308 words, the summary contains 161 words. Saved 48%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

permalink
report
reply
-155 points

I’d prefer that money remain in the USA and pay for healthcare, infrastructure, and student loan debt relief.

permalink
report
reply
76 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

It’s incredible how disrespectful you had to word your reply to get your point across.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

We’ve been saying the same shit for almost two years now. If they don’t fucking understand it now, they should really focus on shutting the fuck up

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

Paid for by what? Say that part again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

The money goes where? Read that part again.

Stays in America paying American salaries which goes back to the country via their taxes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
59 points

Don’t worry, it actually remains in the USA. Part of it is money that was already spent decades ago for equipment that supposed to be retired, the other part is being put into US economy as the USA is producing those weapons.

Also it is rounding error compared to the money spend for healthcare, infrastructure and student loan debt relief: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_federal_budget#/media/File%3A2022_US_Federal_Budget_Infographic.png

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

Not to mention that curtailing Putin’s aspirations is very good for all Americans

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

Every cent we spend in Ukraine is arguably the best return on investment the US has ever had. With no US casualties we have effectively purchased the decimation of our enemies military and crippled their ability to wage any meaningful military action for decades.

Had Putin been successful in Ukraine he would already be setting about plans for the next bullshit excuse to invade the next nation. We played games with Hitler and conceded nation after nation only to find out that he had no intention of ever stopping. These men are all the same.

We can have a conversation about the billions of dollars wasted by the US government every year, this is not one of those instances.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

Yes, it’s actually rather low considering the threat of Fascism sweeping across the EU. Russia will not stop at Ukraine, and Putin has been shoring up his new Axis for years. His crown jewel will be the US handed over on a gold platter by the next Republican administration.

Trump already gifted Putin a US military base in Syria for his birthday in 2019 and took upon himself to surrender Afghanistan to the Taliban through a perfect and beautiful deal he ‘negotiated’ without including the Afghanis.

Putin is hell-bent on reforming the old Russian Empire and becoming tzar before he dies. He knows he doesn’t have long to accomplish this.

If he isn’t soundly defeated soon, he may start another global war. Nobody – excepting billionaires and the insane – wants that horror. Appeasement never works.

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points

That $0.76 per American could be life changing.

You could look at a hospital, get 15 minutes of college free or get two pebbles.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

This is military spending, so two pebbles probably costs more like $76.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Them’s halliburton pebbles. Yes, you’re paying for them. No, you can’t look at them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points

Don’t worry, Republicans will block healthcare, infrastructure, and student loan debt relief. Instead your kids will get to die fighting Russians

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Good thing we can choose to fund both

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

We’re… not funding both?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Healthcare, infrastructure, and education for you? You, that don’t even understand how this money works?

Trust me, they are better spent in this way. I would be curious to know where in the US you are from.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

I’m not saying send no money abroad. I am saying, pump the breaks a little. We have issues here that need to be addressed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

You’re either very naive about politics or you’re arguing in bad faith. Lack of spending on domestic priorities has nothing to do with a lack of money and everything to do with Republicans not wanting those programs funded at all. They’d rather spend in on corporate welfare and tax cuts for billionaires.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That’s pretty much my point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Good news: we have plenty of money for that!

Bad news: Republicans will never let us spend it that way.

Never, ever, let anyone tell you the we lack social programs because we don’t have enough money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-21 points
*

Tbh I wish to agree with you even though you have downvotes, the empire phase of America needs to end. Whatever Russia is trying to accomplish in the Ukraine needs to end.

Russia should choose social democracy because it works and so should we. Russia as it stands can not be allowed to succeed, and America as it stands should embrace a revolutionary change that allows us to meet in the middle with social democracy.

The truth is we can afford to do both though, fight with Ukraine and take care of our people. There is more than enough wealth to give the Ukraine the chance to self determination and do the litany of things we’ve neglected to further capitalism. The pity is that we don’t demand both.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

The thing that people are not understanding is that this isn’t just Russia vs Ukraine war. This is war against the West. It didn’t start with Ukraine and if Russia succeeds it won’t end in Ukraine. Russia tries to get back to superpower status and Ukraine is an important piece in restoring old USSR regions.

The crazy thing is that what needs to be done was even outlined in a book written by Alexander Dugin and until Ukraine invasion everything was going really well (even ahead of schedule, even seemingly unrelated thing like BrExit was part of it, note that book was published in 1997): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foundations_of_Geopolitics#Content

permalink
report
parent
reply
-16 points
*

I didn’t read a single thing from that that I didn’t already get, what I’m arguing is that American control, is not what is best for the planet and arguing against dugin is just our own version of espousing similarly flawed beliefs.

this part especially seems to point the flaws in his argument, but so are the same flaws found in our own march to go to war with Russia.

“The battle for the world rule of Russians” has not ended and Russia remains “the staging area of a new anti-bourgeois, anti-American revolution”. The Eurasian Empire will be constructed “on the fundamental principle of the common enemy: the rejection of Atlanticism, strategic control of the U.S., and the refusal to allow liberal values to dominate us.”"

In the march to war, the call to be cautious and settle things peacefully is always rejected. But I’m not arguing for that I want the Ukraine to have self determination, I just don’t think we should think we get to do it because it serves American interests, we should do it because it is the right thing to do. And we should take care of Healthcare, education, housing, ubi, etc.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 449K

    Comments