Maine barred Donald Trump from the primary ballot Thursday, making it the second state in the country to block the former president from running again under a part of the Constitution that prevents insurrectionists from holding office.

The decision by Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows (D) is sure to be appealed. The Colorado Supreme Court last week found Trump could not appear on the ballot in that state, and the Colorado Republican Party has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review the case. The nation’s high court could resolve for all states whether Trump can run again.

Archive

214 points

I like candidates who weren’t barred.

permalink
report
reply
96 points

I like guys who weren’t captured, and fingerprinted, mugshotted, and booked.

permalink
report
parent
reply
54 points

Wasn’t captured, actually he surrendered like a complete and utter loser

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Were you holding out for a foot chase?

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*

Sad!

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

And then sold merchandise with his mugshot with the caption “Never Surrender.” The mugshot from when he literally surrendered. And MAGA folks bought the stuff proving that they’ll buy anything to prove their “MAGA-ness.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Frankly I don’t love the ones who weren’t, but we take what we can get

permalink
report
parent
reply
155 points

Royal also argued that Trump violated Section 3, while Gordon’s challenge took a different tack, arguing that Trump is not eligible to be on the ballot because he claims to have won the 2020 election, which would have been his second term. The 22nd Amendment states that no person shall be elected to the office of president more than twice.

The other arguments are Colorado redux

permalink
report
reply
118 points

arguing that Trump is not eligible to be on the ballot because he claims to have won the 2020 election, which would have been his second term. The 22nd Amendment states that no person shall be elected to the office of president more than twice.

Oh thats clever!

“The 14th Amendment Constitution says you, an insurrectionist, cannot be on the ballot”

Trump: “I’m not an insurrectionist! I was defending my election to office in 2020!”

"Ah, okay then so you’re admitting that you’re trying to run for a 3rd term in violation of the 22nd Amendment of the Constitution

permalink
report
parent
reply
63 points

Clever, but no. He didn’t get a second term, and his whining in a corner doesn’t change that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

But for him to publicly admit that… it might snap a few people out of the illusion.

…I hope.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Oh that’s clever!

It’s obviously childish as fuck to be playing such twisted logic games with something as important as the Presidency. Clever is not a word I want applied to American jurisprudence

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

Obviously they’re not operating in good faith, so they’ll come up with some nonsense justification as to why president loser deserves a 3rd term or something anyway. But that’s still a novel approach.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Do you really believe, in your heart of hearts, that someone deciding to bar Trump based on this “third term” argument is acting in good faith?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Why wouldn’t they be? Just because a premise is farcical doesn’t mean you can’t accept it for the sake of argument.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

arguing that Trump is not eligible to be on the ballot because he claims to have won the 2020 election

mondo big LOLs there. It’s not likely to hold water in court, imo, and I’m guessing that the argument will be that he never took the oath for the second term. Buuut it might mean Trump is either going to have to admit to the court that he didn’t win or he’s going to be told by the SCOTUS that he didn’t. Get dunked on, idiot.

permalink
report
parent
reply
107 points
*

If this picks up steam, we could very well see another Republican candidate (most likely DeSantis) win the nomination and become Joe Biden’s opponent.

On the other hand, the SCOTUS is Republican controlled. They already got Roe V Wade overturned and could very well rule in Trump’s favour.

Part of me truly worries that America will be the first to fall to a new wave of Fascism, and that this will spur further swings in Europe. (AfD are performing alarmingly well in East Germany, whilst Le Pen has been closer than ever before to winning the French presidency.)

permalink
report
reply
73 points

DeSantis would get fucking wrecked in a national race, Biden’s team would laugh their asses off, then get back to sending crib-seeking missiles to Netanyahu.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Careful, that’s exactly what we said about Trump.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Trump had charisma, DeSantis has anti-charisma. The more people see of him the less people like him. He pissed off big business with his Disney stuff.

There’s a reason his campaign is in hospice care.

If it isn’t Trump it’ll be Haley. She would have a real shot.

But it’s gonna be Trump anyway, so this is kind of moot.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*

You underestimate just how disliked Biden is, and how many Americans honestly believe that Trump had the last election stolen from him.

Also, the fact that Trump survived two impeachments, spurred an attempted insurrection and is only now starting to face state/federal charges that in any other democracy would have had him immediately struck off from the ballot is worrying. It’s set precedent that could allow a more sane, manipulative and competent candidate to commandeer the country.

The only possible good that could come out of a DeSantis nomination would be if Trump ran as an independent in protest and heavily split the right wing vote, which would guarantee a second Biden term.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I agree with everything that both of you said.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Desantis would get wrecked in a cognitive dissonance race with trump.

permalink
report
parent
reply
54 points

If this picks up steam, we could very well see another Republican candidate (most likely DeSantis) win the nomination and become Joe Biden’s opponent.

That’s the entire point, isn’t it? To prevent the insurrectionist from being on the ballot, not “prevent the republicans from being on the ballot.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

More than that, some people will still vote for Trump as a write in, which will split the Republican vote and force them to lose

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

East Germany?

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points
*

Yes. The former DDR part is commonly still called that. It still differs noticeably from the West in terms of culture and level of development. Unfortunately, the entire region has moved significantly to the right politically. So much even that an openly right-wing extremist party has a majority in multiple parts of it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

I didn’t know Dance Dance Revolution got a party. Weird thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It’s like saying Southern California. It’s just a region within a larger state.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I hate to say it, but the world is overdue for a new world war. Fascism seems to rise when the previous generation that experienced Fascism dies off. Nobody who went through it wants that to happen again, but like toddlers, we need to touch the stove to learn it’s hot.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Correction: the rich want another world war and are pushing for it. The brainwashing that has been going on for years wasn’t paid by your average joe.

And as usual, it will be paid with the blood of the poor

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

I always hate the “moving to Canada” thing. American hubris leads them to believe that they can just emigrate to whatever country they like without barriers. That’s not how it works.

Just like the USA, Canada isn’t going to grant citizenship to every rando who approaches their borders.

I will say this though, depending on where they’re coming from in the US, and what they’ve experienced in terms of threats and persecution, I could see there being a case for requests for asylum for LGBT+ people trying to escape to Canada. And that’s sad as hell for all of us.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Uh… What do you mean “if they win”? The LGBTQIA community here in Canada has dramatically expanded with Americans looking to apply for citizenship. LGBTQIA protections and civil rights are crumbling in the States even without the GOP strictly in power. The Exodus is already underway.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

There are more queers in America than there are people in Canada.

You ain’t seen nothing yet.

Going to be some absolutely amazing looking refugee tents at some point tho

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

We have a bigot/ fascist lover here in Canada called Pierre Poilievre who’s in the lead in the polls. If something doesn’t change between now and 2025 Canada may fall to the far right as well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

They didn’t in 2016, what changed?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Trump was unpredictable in 2016. He talked a big game, but we had no idea what laws he’d pass, what his policies would be, etc. Sadly many voted for him because he was seen as an “outsider” since people were tired of standard politicians.

Now we have a good idea what he’ll do, January 6th happened, and Trump has been vocal about trans genocide specifically.

permalink
report
parent
reply
76 points

Maine is one of two states (Nebraska is the other) that doesn’t give all their electoral votes to the popular vote winner in their state. Trump got one electoral vote there in both 2016 and 2020.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

This true, though Republicans have gerrymandered the districts so bad that it almost always ends up as all Republican anyway. Look at how crazy this looks: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nebraska's_congressional_districts#/media/File%3ANebraska_Congressional_Districts%2C_118th_Congress.tif.

For some fucking reason, Lincoln (a liberal city that’s the second largest in Nebraska) is in the same district as a bunch of rural towns that I would have to drive for hours to get to. Sarpy county, which most consider to be a part of Omaha (and again, is about an hour-ish drive from Lincoln, was recently switched to our district because they are largely conservative, and they redrew it just before we were supposed to be electing our new congressperson (which, by the way, was a special election because the previous Republican congressman was convicted of felonies relating to lying about foreign campaign contributions, go figure). A democrat swept Lincoln, but lost because they piled on enough rural counties in the fucked up map. Republicans have no respect for democracy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

While true, I believe this is only relevant for the primary at this point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
72 points

Seriously. We ALL SAW it on Jan 6! Dude wrecked our countries record of peaceful transition all because he threw a bitch ass tantrum. Thanks, jerk.

permalink
report
reply
56 points

If anyone’s arguing the other way… Where was the national guard? An angry mob attacked our highest ranking politicians at the nations capital and it was less defended than your average Walmart on Black Friday. In the end Pence had to call them in despite Trump watching the entire thing unfold on live TV.

It was an orchestrated attempted coup, full stop.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Just like the USAF standdown order

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

I really wish that he wasn’t stopped from attending it like he wanted too, this would be such an open and shut thing if otherwise. Now the courts are all hung up on if he participated or not. He obviously fucking caused it but you know, due process and all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I’m thankful he didn’t attend. His sycophants would likely have gone much further with their GodKing present, egging them on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yea, honestly, in the overall picture of things I am too, because who knows what would have actually happened if things had been taken further with him there like you said. But just for this scenario where it went as far as it did - the court is now hung up on technicalities, it would be a different conversation if he had.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Silver lining, he could have gotten shot sticking his head through a window

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 18K

    Posts

  • 469K

    Comments