There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.

6 points

These are pretty terrible arguments.

  1. Google is a primarily advertising based company yes, but Apple and Microsoft aren’t
  2. You can’t compare chromium to IE - chromium is open source, and also it’s actually good
permalink
report
reply
2 points

Chromium being open source actually means jack shit. It’s controlled by Google, one singular entity whose only desire is to maximise their iron grip on the internet to squeeze as much ad revenue as they can.

This isn’t hyperbole, look at the recent WEI stuff or manifest v3 crap. Time and again, these corporations have showed that they just don’t give a shit about the free and open internet.

Which leads to the first point, (Microsoft does seem to be moving pretty heavily into advertising though with all the bs in windows 11), you absolutely can not in good conscience use a big tech product with the argument that they’re not an ad company. It’s not just the ads which is the issue here. And the problem is sooner or later they’ll realise they’ve a trove of monetisable data, so might as well do something with it. And then we’ll have no choice because there will be no free and open alternatives left

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The issue is the rendering engine monopoly. Apple and Microsoft browsers as well as chromium all use chrome rendering engine making them basically the same browser under the hood.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

That’s not true - Apple’s browsers use WebKit. I wish they used chromium though, Safari is basically the new IE.

Having all browsers use the same, open source, modern and powerful rendering engine has many benefits. It makes web development MUCH easier, improves user experience because websites work the same on all browsers (apart from any proprietary stuff the browser vendors might add on top of chromium, but that’s not chromium’s fault), and greatly speeds up adoption of new web standards.

I don’t want there to be a Chrome browser monopoly for obvious reasons but I don’t see the downside of every browser using the same rendering engine as long as it’s not controlled by any one entity

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

oh cool my favorite thread again

permalink
report
reply
-2 points

Opera works well with Twitch, but I haven’t done any detailed stat analysis on usage. The trade off between it and FF is (with my GPU focused browser settings) Firefox with higher CPU usage/temp(by maybe 1-2 degrees, negligible) and opera with higher GPU usage(but lower cpu temps/usage, as stated above). Since Opera is Chrome-built, it’s in a walled garden deal, when possible.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

Opera is the biggest piece of shit in existence, as it sends all of your data to a weird Chinese company. They also make use of shady marketing practices and constantly lie to their users.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It sends those packets to 0.0.0.0 thanks to my HOSTS setup.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I really don’t see a reason to use a proprietary browser in 2023. Firefox is the best in my opinion. Chromium and anything based on it is bad for the open internet. Google shouldn’t be able to control the entire web through their browser engine. Firefox is the only viable alternative.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*
2 points

Trading the article, the CEO is meeting the assigned goals exceptionally well. The CEO does not give themselves the raise per se, but the board does, right?

As it turns out, moving away from Firefox is exactly Mozilla’s plan.

Earlier this year, Mozilla laid out their vision for the future of their organization – and it did not include Firefox.  The focus for the future of Mozilla – according to Mozilla – is primarily based around Artificial Intelligence services.

In fact, Mozilla leadership stated, quite plainly, that they intend to take Mozilla “in a different direction.”

When you consider the goals of Mozilla… the decreasing Firefox marketshare is no longer much of a concern.  In fact, moving revenue away from Firefox, while investing in A.I. systems (and other subscription services) becomes the primary goal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Any Alternative to Brave? I have FF as primary browser but for some websites which tends to break on FF, I would like to use something non-Chrome/Brave on Windows.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

I keep chromium as a secondary if something breaks on Firefox. It’s the foundation of chrome without all the silly Google shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I think you want ungoogled-chromium

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Thanks, this is what I’m looking for.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Librewolf sounds like Brave, but built on top of Firefox. It also doesn’t spam you with stupid ads like Brave does.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Librewolf is better I think. It’s pretty much a privacy hardened Firefox with the telemetry taken out. No odd crypto scheme like Brave either.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

No odd crypto scheme like Brave either.

That’s a great point

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

But my alt should be Chromium based for the weird cases.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

What websites break on FF?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

FF is primary but started using Vivaldi as my chromium based browser… I’m definitely not nerd level privacy geek but it hits all my check boxes for configuration, customization, and ease of use.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

If the site breaks on Firefox, probably it only works in chrome based, so I’d say just use ungoogled-chromium.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I use edge for the edge case when websites don’t work after changing the user agent

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I have found edge to be more bloaty than brave

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Which sites? I haven’t had that in years.

(And you can report them to Mozilla and they will fix it by either fixing a bug or creating a workaround for that site)

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Top of my Head: Ms Teams.

Also, on side note, FF on Desktop doesn’t support PWAs while on Mobile they do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

As far as non-Chrome goes, there’s only two other modern browser engines. Webkit which is Apple stuff, and Gecko which is Firefox. So I don’t believe so, no.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Hacker News

!hackernews@derp.foo

Create post

This community serves to share top posts on Hacker News with the wider fediverse.

Rules
  1. Keep it legal
  2. Keep it civil and SFW
  3. Keep it safe for members of marginalised groups

Community stats

  • 2

    Monthly active users

  • 9.2K

    Posts

  • 6.2K

    Comments

Community moderators