245 points

States that participate in the federal program are required to cover half of the administrative costs, which would cost Nebraska an estimated $300,000. Advocates of the program note that the administrative cost is far outweighed by the $18 million benefit, which the U.S. Department of Agriculture estimates would benefit 175,000 Nebraska children who might otherwise go hungry on some days during the summer.

Imagine being such a reprehensible monster that you’d let 175k children in your state starve rather than participate in a federal program that’d help feed them when school is out each summer. It’s unconscionable.

permalink
report
reply
96 points
*

It’s unconscionable.

BUt… but… he doesn’t believe in welfare! how dare you intrude onto his lack of belief!

(/s. this guy can fuck off to the nether.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
59 points

I keep hearing that violence isn’t the answer but I swear it feels like… FOR LEGAL REASONS THIS IS SATIRE

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

What are we supposed to do when our leaders and the wealthy (i.e., a small minority who holds all of the influence) have effectively declared war on the rest of us (i.e., almost everybody)?

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

REASONS THIS IS SATIRE

You reminded me of: https://youtu.be/eg3_kUaYFJA

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

No no no, violence can be the answer, depending on what the question is. Like this:

Historically, what happens when the poorest citizens of a nation have no food, no homes, and no hope for the future, because the rich are hording it all?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Violence isn’t the answer. It is a question and the answer is, ‘yes’.

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points

Republicans get off on dead children. It’s as simple as that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Kinky.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

John Wayne Gacy would be proud.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

It’s unconscionable

It’s conservative.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Remember, Republicans only care about fetuses. They don’t care about babies and kids.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The birthed children need to starve so they can be told they’re starving because of democrats.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Every farmer in that state receives welfare. Every fucking farmer benefits from agricultural subsidies.

The governor believes in federal welfare, just not welfare that directly benefits kids.

permalink
report
parent
reply
173 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
60 points

Don’t look for any moral center for these crooks. As you’ve shown, they are complete and utter hypocrites. He condemns “welfare” because it gets him votes, while he gladly uses taxpayer money to fund himself and his wealthy campaign contributors. It’s the GOP long con.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

“When someone shows you who they are, believe them the first time.” Projection as always…

permalink
report
parent
reply
116 points

“I don’t believe in welfare”

Feck off and stop accepting federal funding, you fucking welfare queen

permalink
report
reply
1 point

I love the DON’T BELIEVE statements. I don’t believe in guns, yet they exist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
113 points

Fucker believes in welfare when it’s called corn subsidies.

permalink
report
reply
30 points

Loophole: Poor people must change their name to corn

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

“Why are they Falling Away from Me?”

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I think the best course of action would be to reframe their thinking, instead of allowing things to keep in being called subsidies, force them to try to clarify the difference between a subsidy and welfare. Ie, farming subsidy? You mean farming welfare. Banking subsidy? You mean banking welfare. Did you know that Boeing Corp has received $15 Billion in subsidies not paid back? You mean $15 Billion in welfare, they in fact, received nearly $75 Billion in welfare, most of that welfare being received since 2000, and of that ~$75 Billion in welfare received, they actually paid back ~$60 Billion. So they received $15 Billion dollars in welfare from the US taxpayers. They are by no means the sole corporate beneficiary of welfare from the taxpayers, just the first one I stumbled upon. Point being, force the language to reflect what they hate so their hypocrisy can be exposed and other people’s eyes can be opened. Most people don’t know exactly what a subsidy is, they think there is some sort of justification for it that makes it beyond criticizing, a subsidy is just welfare for corporations or farms to keep them in business, we want them in business, sure, but we also want kids to be able to eat over the summer, and if farms and Boeing and banks are deserving of welfare from the government, and hence from the US taxpayers, why aren’t kids?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Exactly right. Corporate welfare.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Because kids aren’t lining their pockets with cash.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

This is for their voters too, we need to target those who vote for them and those who don’t to try and make a difference. They do this shit because they know their base doesn’t care so we need to make that base as small as possible to topple this bullshit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
97 points

But he’s okay with PPP loans being forgiven and also gets USDA subsidies for Pillen Family farms. Source: https://projects.propublica.org/coronavirus/bailouts/search?q=Pillen&v=1 Source:https://farm.ewg.org/persondetail.php?custnumber=A09760551

permalink
report
reply
18 points

Those entitled brats made a deal with the devil when they took the money. Greed got the better of them. It always does.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 385K

    Comments