45 points

I understand some of these words

Brb, gotta go eat a crayon

permalink
report
reply
40 points
*

There’s various technicalities of how and where Beyesian statistics apply to the world but I really interpreted it as meaning “if the world is ending then it doesn’t matter and if not then I’m up $50”. The Beyesian is just ruthlessly practical.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

That is definitely not the joke. The joke is that the frequentist approach gives you a clearly nonsensical conclusion, because the prior probability of the sun exploding is extremely small.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*

Not only that, but there’s a higher chance of the detector lying than the Sun supernova-ing, so it’s probably a false positive. Yes I did just read some paragraphs from 3–4 Wikipedia articles.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
6 points

Thank you, I’ll check it out eventually

BTW they call it Peach but it tastes like candle

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

I remember inserting this comic in my class paper comparing frequentist and bayesian interpretations of probability during my PhD. Aah, good times.

permalink
report
reply
38 points

Missing: any sort of physicist who will tell them both that the forward model says that the sun won’t explode for a few billion years, and so far that model hasn’t been wrong.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

That is not missing, it’s the entire fucking point of the cartoon.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Missing: David Hume

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points
*

Minor correction: in a few billion years our sun will expand into its red giant death phase.

Also: our star can’t go nova by our understanding of astrophysics. If it actually can, then we might need to throw out a lot of astrophysics, including predictions on when our star will expand.

Also also: the odds of the dice giving double 6s is MUCH higher than our sun going nova at any point in time even if it could go nova and was overdue.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I think our sun can go nova. What it can’t do is supernova based on the Chandrashekhar limit

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

That last part is what the Bayesian scientist is wagering on, it’s not missing, as op suggested

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Ah, gotcha. I tried learning Bayesian probability once and failed utterly. One of the only classes I just barely passed (stat was the other). My brain just barely computes it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Isn’t our sun too small to explode at all? IIRC the sun will expand enough to engulf the earth’s orbit but will eventually shrink to a dwarf.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*

Too small to supernova and black hole, yes. But large enough to have a decent boom. Probably at least red giant, then a nova (explosion casting off outer layers) leaving a white dwarf remnant.

If I’m around by then, my model of medical science progress is wrong ;)

E: I’m wrong. That casting off of the outer gas envelope is not a nova. It’s just a death throe of some sort.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Thanks for the update bro!

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

I don’t like this comic because the frequentist statistician is operating with an effective n=1. You’d ask the detector 1000 more times, and use those results to get your answer.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Take it as a commentary on publication bias.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

sample size of 1 is usually fine. source: i surveyed 1 person

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*

The frequentist is unable to insert pre-conceived biases. Both will converge on the real answer if they repeat the experiment enough, but the bias being what it is, the Sun may indeed go nova on the necessary time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

“Detector! Has the sun gone nova?”

“Calculating… results available in 9 minutes and 14 seconds.”

permalink
report
reply

Science Memes

!science_memes@mander.xyz

Create post

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don’t throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

Community stats

  • 12K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.8K

    Posts

  • 68K

    Comments