Oracle responds to Red Hat

158 points

Oracle weighing in on anything open source related is peak hypocrisy. Fuck Oracle. They’re not our friends.

permalink
report
reply
49 points

Yeah seriously. It’s in their best interests to continue to ride on top of Redhat’s work. Do not believe for a second that if they were in Redhat’s position, they wouldn’t do the exact same thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Of course they would! Corporations do what’s in their best interests. Corporations gonna corporate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

As much as I dislike Oracle, they’ve been pretty good stewards of the Java open source project, and haven’t had any issues with anyone else rebadging the JDK, whether it be Zulu, BellSoft, Amazon, Microsoft, SAP, IBM, etc.

If anything, I’d like to see them put their money where their mouth is and hire Linux devs to continue Oracle Linux in an open manner.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points
*

they’ve been pretty good stewards of the Java open source project

I am pretty sure Google (the company itself) would say otherwise.

They’ve also been pretty horrible stewards of VirtualBox.

Oracle is not friends with open source. To be honest, I trust RedHat over Oracle and that’s saying something.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

If anything, I’d like to see them put their money where their mouth is and hire Linux devs to continue Oracle Linux in an open manner.

Oracle Linux is already open: https://yum.oracle.com/. ISOs and full sources are freely downloadable, you don’t even need to create an account, and the Oracle Linux license explicitly states that you retain all your open source rights to any open source software distributed as part of Oracle Linux. I suppose it would be possible for Oracle to change their license to make it more akin to Red Hat’s and thus make Oracle Linux less free, but there’s been no sign of Oracle looking to do that.

Oracle also definitely has lots of Linux devs. They even throw some shade at IBM in the post:

By the way, if you are a Linux developer who disagrees with IBM’s actions and you believe in Linux freedom the way we do, we are hiring.

They need those Linux devs because all of Oracle Cloud and Oracle Exadata are built on Oracle Linux, and Oracle tests their main cash cow Oracle Database exclusively on Oracle Linux. I think that last point is actually the reason that Oracle Linux even exists. I don’t think Oracle cares too much about owning the OS layer, they want to be able to support their Database product on an OS that the majority of their customers are using without having to pay a tax to the OS vendor.

I also work on a product that has to interoperate with RHEL, and I also want my company to be able to test our product without having to pay a tax to Red Hat. I’m quite happy to see this blog post from Oracle because it shows that our aims are aligned and it means we’ve got an 800 lb. gorilla on our side of the line. Entirely possible Oracle could turn around and do the same things, but I’ve got no compunctions about cheering them on while our aims coincide.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Fuck oracle. They can do whatever you think it’s good about anything, but their licensing for commercial entities is horrendous and predatory.

So, once again, fuck oracle.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Red Hat is quite big contributor to Java too… and oracle isn’t good steward tbh…

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

But if their vote changes RedHat’s mind I don’t really care

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Why do you think it would? Oracle rebranding RHEL and selling it as their own distro in direct competition with Red Hat is no doubt the biggest reason they made this change in the first place

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

They could just charge for-profit companies instead.

There would be ways to get around that, but then again, there are ways to get around the current implementation too

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I had to read that again as I thought it was someone telling that to Oracle, which would make WAY more sense.

permalink
report
parent
reply
57 points

Even ORACLE is calling out Red Hat.

Who’s next, Apple?

Currently testing Debian in a VM, I have lots of files so I need to set everything straight before I switch.

permalink
report
reply
32 points

Not because Oracle likes open source, but because they like to profit from RedHat’s hard work.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I suppose Apple uses Linux in some of their servers, so maybe. But their desktop product is Darwin so I don’t think that’s getting any votes

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Their desktop product is a stolen BSD.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Indeed, but with that kind of licensing there’s nothing stopping them. We already found limitations of GPL with RedHat, I think all of these licenses need an overhaul

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

This is hilarious considering one of the main reasons IBM is clamping down on RHEL is because they are literally taking RHEL, changed the stickers to “Oracle” and calls it a day to sell their own propietary shit. Of course they are against RedHat closing down RHEL, they need it to compile Oracle Linux.

I don’t like what RedHat is doing (or IBM, however you want to see it) but cheering for Oracle on this particular issue is just wrong

permalink
report
reply
2 points

What I don’t understand is: who is using oracle linux? Never heard of a single person or company using it?

One must be really far from linux to choose oracle linux among hundreds of available distros

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Anyone who uses Oracle Cloud is either directly or indirectly using Oracle Linux. Oracle Cloud is ~2% of the cloud market, so it’s small compared to the big three (AWS ~32%, Azure ~23%, GCP ~10% according to this report) but 2% of a very big market (~$237 billion total estimated for 2023) is still a significant user base.

From my own work, most of the Oracle Cloud adoption I see appears to be driven by favourable prices for Exadata Cloud as compared to purchasing on-prem Exadata hardware. Oracle Linux is also baked into Exadata “Cloud-at-Customer”, which has essentially the same cloud control plane but the hardware and all data lives on-prem at the customer’s site. That seems fairly popular with customers who want Exadata performance but can’t allow their data to leave their premises for security reasons.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I am happy I don’t have anything to do with oracle…

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Mostly their Oracle Database customers (which aren’t few), I suppose. There are many which will fire up a Oracle Linux vm on their servers to install Oracle database, mostly because its “easier” and Oracle gives some support for those.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

A lot of company behind the scence do, with Oracle DB… even there are RHEL, they opt to use OL because it’s free, and they only need to pay the DB License…

Free estate

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

What I don’t understand is: who is using oracle linux? Never heard of a single person or company using it?

One must be really far from linux to choose oracle linux among hundreds of available distros

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

One must be really far from linux to choose oracle linux among hundreds of available distros

Not really a choice when the products they sell (their database/cloud solutions) are tied to it or RHEL. But yeah, I doubt there’s many who’d call it their favorite distro

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Me neither. And I always wondered why you wouldn’t just go directly to the source and go with RedHat for enterprise usecases. Perhaps cheaper support contracts?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

We struggled with red hat because our product is usually in airgapped installations. We know how many we’ve sold, but we don’t know how many are still in use.

Say a customer buys one unit. Then 5 years later, they replace it. And 5 years on, they replace it again. On the books that’s 3 sold. We don’t know that two were retired, we don’t know these are all the same installation. So red hat wants us to pay 3 annual licences for this, and those licences don’t end until we can prove the installation was retired. The costs effectively snowball indefinitely.

We wanted to pay - it was the easiest route to certain federal qualifications. But we couldn’t come to an agreement on how to pay.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

If you’re using a software suite that requires Oracle Database, it and RHEL are safe options. It’s used where I work for that reason, but only relating to said software. This vendor only officially supports those 2 distros, and to a lesser extent Windows.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It would be corporate clients that are already all on Oracle for their careers. I’ve met guys that have built their entire career on Oracle and if you suggest any other software they’ll try to politically assassinate you. Some people just care about money not the work they do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Pathetic wretches who couldn’t escape Oracle’s clutches, mostly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

My company was starting to use OEL extensively over the past few months.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Now now, calling Oracle a downstream RHEL is straight up lying. We need sincere comments.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Oracle doing what they’re doing is literally explicitly and intentionally permitted under the licensing of the Linux kernel.

It’s not abusing anything. It’s the purpose of the license.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

If we’re going about what’s technically permitted, then RedHat is also permitted to change licence, close it down and stop any new versions from being open or free. All their development goes into the upstream so I don’t even know what Oracle is trying to say here. Except “we want open access to RHEL, not just upstream sources like CentOS”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

No they aren’t. Not unless they remove all the GPL code from their software.

It’s the entire purpose of the GPL. You can never own derivative code.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

By the way, if you are a Linux developer who disagrees with IBM’s actions and you believe in Linux freedom the way we do, we are hiring.

🤨

permalink
report
reply
20 points

If they are so keen on GPL, why dont they re license ZFS from its current GPL clashing license that stops it from getting Integrated into Linux kernel source code…

permalink
report
reply

Linux

!linux@lemmy.ml

Create post

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word “Linux” in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

  • Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
  • No misinformation
  • No NSFW content
  • No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

Community stats

  • 6.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.5K

    Posts

  • 177K

    Comments