ROCKFORD, Ill. (WLS) – Eight migrant buses were in route to Chicago Sunday morning after a plane from Texas carrying over 300 asylum seekers landed in Rockford overnight.

The migrants were flown from Texas to Illinois in a jumbo jet, landing at Rockford International Airport, Rockford ABC affiliate WTVO reported.

The migrant crisis Chicago has been grappling with has once again made its way to the suburbs.

After the plane landed, the passengers were reportedly immediately put on buses heading to Chicago’s landing zone near West Polk Street and South Desplaines Street.

The City of Chicago issued a statement Sunday afternoon, saying that city officials had been notified by Rockford of the plane’s arrival. Eight buses from Rockford have dropped off migrants in multiple suburbs on the way to Chicago, but they have not yet reached Chicago, city officials said.

3 points

I’m all for spreading the load of handling these migrants around the country, Texas cities shouldn’t have to do all the work and they certainly cannot do much of the work without government support in TX.

So… now we have migrants all over the country but are they expected to return to TX for their immigration hearings? The US govt. needs to figure this shit out ASAP and have the hearings transferred to where these people are.

permalink
report
reply
90 points
*

There already is a process to allow immigrants to spread around the country, what Texas is doing is delaying and circumventing that process, making it take longer and cost more. I say send Texas the bill for their nonsense.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

As a Texan, I agree. But, I’d like to see some human trafficking charges for those responsible too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Howdy, partner. 🤠

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’m sure Texas would love to have a federal department take charge and handle all the immigration within their borders. The feds should offer to take the work off their hands.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

are they expected to return to TX for their immigration hearings? The US govt. needs to figure this shit out ASAP and have the hearings transferred to where these people are.

The shitshow is the plan when they’re bussing migrants around, usually some local lawyer steps up to help though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*
29 points

I’m setting the bar at not making it worse, because the other guy definitely would make it worse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It’s a sad day when the bar is on the floor, but some people broke out shovels…

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

Can we stop pretending that Texas is still a state please?

permalink
report
reply
7 points

What does this even mean?

To combat this we’ll need to live in reality. This has a “not my president” tinge to it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It means they get to be a state when they fucking act like it. America should secede from them. Enough is enough.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I don’t think the answer is secession, tbh.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

America should overthrow Texas

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

LOL, regieme change now!

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

LOL, regieme change now!

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

We should flip it like on one of those HGTV shows.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

Can you stop spouting misinformation claiming it isn’t?

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

You know this is going to back fire on Texas, states might require permits or taxes to travel to and from a state.

permalink
report
reply
-2 points

I’m not sure whether that would be a feasible solution. The undocumented part of “undocumented immgrant” is a result of immigrants bypassing a similar system when entering the country.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

“Hey let’s find a solution to our broken immigration system”

Texas: “nope send dem to dem LiBeRaLs”

“Wow Texas youre so smart, you’re totally not trafficking people like the cartels”

They should just secede and become a desert version of North korea.

Edit:corrected

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

secede. Dumbass.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

They should just succeed and become a desert version of North korea.

Do you mean secede?

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

They can’t. several supreme court cases already give aeright to travel. Immigration belongs to the federal government

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Just put toll booths in at the border to Illinois from all directions. It’s almost impossible to travel across the u.s. without going through Illinois or going way out of your way to avoid it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

I’ve been all over the US and pretty sure I’ve never been in or through Illinois with exception to flights. I think you’re greatly overestimating the size of Illinois and underestimating available options of US driving travel.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Somebody should explain that to all the Texas towns trying to ban traveling out of state for an abortion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I don’t think those are gonna work either.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Which ones

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

That would be pretty unconstitutional.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

bans travel to other states for an abortion

having busses travel from other states is unconstitutional

Pick a lane

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Banning travel to other states for an abortion is also very clearly unconstitutional. There are still pretty big differences between restricting travel from specific states for something that is completely legal (driving a bus) and restricting your citizens from going outside your state to do something that is illegal in your state (abortion). One is a matter of jurisdiction while the other is a matter of travel restriction.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

What?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

You know this is going to back fire on Texas, states might require permits or taxes to travel to and from a state.

I’m just waiting for the /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Ha-ha.

As I understand it, this is a suggestion that it would be okay for states to take blatantly unconstitutional action in retribution for the likely criminal acts of the Texas state government. I’m hoping that I’m wrong, because that’s nuts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-88 points

I’m glad they are going to a sanctuary city.

permalink
report
reply
40 points

I’m glad all you fascists are outing yourselves for when the time comes ❤️

permalink
report
parent
reply
-24 points

I clicked on your post history and all I can understand is that you’ve very angry about a lot of things. Do you live in a state that allows weed? You might try weed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Rockford is not even remotely close to Chicago.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-12 points

Yeah, but if you ask someone from Rockford where they’re from they will say “Chicago.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

Thats true of literally everyone that lives in areas surrounding a world famous city. Sanfran, LA, New york, DC, Orlando.

The fifteenth time you’ve explained the difference between bothel and seattle, you start to just say seattle since you’re saying “its near seattle” to explain where it is anyways.

permalink
report
parent
reply
54 points

I see. Human trafficking is okay if it gets people you don’t like out of your hair. Noted.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-29 points

My understanding is that Chicago welcomes illegal immigrants. Why would you not want them to go to a place where they are welcomed?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

migrants are welcome in AMERICA, maybe you sure try acting like an American.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

My understanding is it doesn’t matter if the place you’re being trafficked to welcomes you for it to be human trafficking.

But, again, you seem to think there are situations where human trafficking is acceptable, those situations apparently being ‘I don’t like those people.’

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Chicago welcomes women and children too, should I round up a bunch in my local area and forcibly transit them under false pretenses as a smug political stunt?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Seriously, give them more! It’s what those cities want!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

…because you and your ilk have repeatedly shown open hostility towards desperate people, and now there’s people who will show them compassion?

I’ll agree that immigration is broken and needs overhaul (especially for green cards & visas) but throwing a shit fit and using humans as political props is not helping.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Texas: we could send them back to their country OR we could allow them in and send them to another state.

Therefore, Texas: illegal immigration is OK and we support it.

Also Texas: WAAAAA 😭😭😭😭

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 511K

    Comments