98 points

Honestly this is one of the only things holding me back from going to graphene. Once this is available to non alpha users I might make the switch properly.

permalink
report
reply
23 points

Absolutely. Android Auto is a must for me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

I’m on stable, and using it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
95 points

I tried out this OS last year and really loved it, until I went on a road trip and couldn’t use Android Auto. This is huge and will make GrapheneOS an extremely attractive option to privacy minded people.

permalink
report
reply
18 points

I think Android Auto is really the only thing keeping me from completely de-googling. Many times in the past I’ve installed some stripped down ROM or whatever but I always go back because Android Auto is too convenient.

I wish there was a nice open source alternative that worked with my head unit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

So you can have Android Auto while beinging degoogled. I do. As others have pointed out there is: https://github.com/sn-00-x/aa4mg

It’s a bit of a faff to install, but works.

The problem I found is no SatNav that can take into account traffic. The best I’ve found is “Organic Maps”, but it is open and works without the Google infrastructure. No getting round that traffic knowledge makes Google Maps better.

I have non AA things forcing me towards having to at least partly re-google.

I’ve been eying GrapheneOS as a way to compromise without being compromised.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

To me it is super weird that GrapheneOS positions itself as a way to degoogle - but it is only supported on google’s Pixel hardware.

permalink
report
reply
56 points

Pixel hardware is some of the easiest to get/best/cost effective with an unlocked bootloader.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Too bad the only affordable ones are those that have little to no support left.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Why would anyone care about official support? That’s not why you buy a pixel

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

That sounds like a reasonable position. Google would have an advantage in getting timely AOSP and security updates, but getting that stuff done should be a high priority for all manufacturers anyway. As for the rest of the list, there are things I don’t know about - but at a glance it looks fair enough. So I guess there could and probably should be other phones trying to meet those conditions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

For example, they’ll regularly suggest using sandboxed Google Play over F-Droid or Aurora Store

Because many of my used apps are only available in Google Play.

GrapheneOS gives you options that you don’t have to use. I don’t agree with you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You know what Aurora Store is, right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I think because on other manufacturer android phones, like Samsung, you’d have to de-Google and also de-Samsung.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’m betting it’s because Pixels have some unique hardware/ software quirks or something.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

iirc they are the only phones that allow adding custom avb keys and then relocking the bootloader

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

Oh hell yeah. That was a big issue when I tried out gOS last year.

permalink
report
reply
26 points

Awesome. I’ve been using GrapheneOS on my Pixel 7 for almost a year now and it’s been great. I won’t be using this feature, but am happy it might attract more users.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

I’m still sour that Google disables hdmi/DP over USB-C on Pixels on purpose, and it bothers me that Graphene devs never bothered adding it back.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I think it’s available on the Pixel 8. Graphene OS enabled USB-C video out a couple of months ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

To be fair, in terms of adding features, they probably care more about parity with stock Android (as their secondary focus, since their primary is security) vs actually superceding it.

Has anybody else figured out how to add it back to the Pixel? If so, you might be able to convince them to pull the work of others over.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 505K

    Comments