39 points
*

Source: https://xkcd.com/927/.

Not posting with alternative text is like missing half of the xkcd.

permalink
report
reply
6 points
*

Wow, somehow this escaped me all these years. I feel like I’ve got a bunch of fresh XKCD to read now.

For the uneducated: On a mobile browser you just press and hold the comic (long tap). On a computer you hover over the image and the alt text will appear next to the cursor.

The alt text in this one was:

spoiler

Fortunately, the charging one has been solved now that we’ve all standardized on mini-USB. Or is it micro-USB? Shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
27 points

One of my favorites

permalink
report
reply
27 points
*

Fortunately, the charging one has been solved now that we’ve all standardized on mini-USB. Or is it micro-USB? Shit.

permalink
report
reply
25 points

Wasn’t the standard USB-C? Maybe we should just create the Universal USB, the U-USB.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

With their naming standards, it would probably be called “U^2SB, Universal Super Fast Serial Bus”

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

USB One X

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It’s USB-C.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

I thought I recognized the original Alt text

I’m very glad this comment is finally obsolete.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

i saw it on the cumcord website (yes its a real serious project)

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

This of course ignores all the other times a new common standard succeeded

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Doesn’t that almost always require a significant government intervention/regulation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Phone and laptop chargers converged from numerous standards to just a few all on their own I think, no?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Yes, but under treath of lawmakers mandating a single standard. And the EU has now forced a single standard anyway on smartphones, tablets, etc.

Although I agree that there are quite a few examples of a “naturally emerging” single standards without lawmaker intervention, but this is not really one of them…

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Yeah, in such a situation you should always try to compare the standards, look at the userbases and suddenly there are only very few that actually make sense. If everyone just does this, one standard will eventually crystalise as the one to use (or at least depending on the situation). Character encoding is an interesting example, because nowadays (almost) everything just uses UTF-8, despite there having been many.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

UTF-8 is absolutely magical in how it’s backwards compatible with ASCII. Windows still uses UTF-16 which makes supporting Unicode filenames and stuff a huge pain compared to linux. At least pretty much the entire web is UTF-8.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Programmer Humor

!programmerhumor@lemmy.ml

Create post

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

  • Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
  • No NSFW content.
  • Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.

Community stats

  • 5K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.6K

    Posts

  • 36K

    Comments